flyingphil
Posted a lot
Posts: 2,477
Member is Online
|
|
May 30, 2018 18:03:50 GMT
|
Interesting that David Vizard is being quoted - when I started drag racing (1974/5) with my Junior Modified Sprite, he was racing his Production Avenger Tiger - and beat me! I believe he was working at Hillman/Rootes/Chrysler at the time and he said he kept going to the stores to get the "best" blueprinted rockers/valves etc by going through "lots and Lots" checking the dimensions. Later on, his daughter was racing one of his "Hot" 1400cc? Minis...and that beat my, by then, newly RV8 powered Sprite(1985/6)....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is that a valid figure do you think? After all the valve is only ever at max lift very briefly but the cylinder has has time to fill during the ramp up and down again?? So, have you seen any power back to back figures with flow increases on anything you have done? So for example if the carb on an engine was the restricting element in the system and you increased the flow by, say 20%, would there be a 20% increase in the engine? Be it power or torque or volumetric efficiency or some other metric? (all other factors constant). I'm developing RV8 heads at the moment for a customer and have done a few dyno tests and whilst the theory (as quoted by darkspeed) indicated a power potential of 2.05 hp per CFM@28" H20 reality seems to indicate 1.8ish HP per CFM for the Rover heads. I don't think the superflow formula figures are ever really achievable for those of us without NASCAR budgets
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
Nov 24, 2018 18:33:42 GMT
|
The Strato's Honda C27A special brew - grasstracker IDF manifold got some work carried out on it by RBE to open it out and reshape it to accommodate the 44mm IDF's that I bought and today I dropped it on the bench quickly to see if we made much in the way of gains. If we summary the previous tests the original flow from the grasstracker carbs and bodged 32mm chokes was 185 CFM and at most 188 with the choke horns. When fitted with the 34mm chokes and horns the flow lifted to 204CFM and then when fitted to the manifold it dropped to 196CFM - a decent enough gain all the same. I suspect there would have been losses with the 32mm 188CFM original carbs dropping a few CFM on the manifold maybe 5CFM to 183CFM as an initial benchmark. The 44mm on the manifold giving a final result of 206 CFM on the unported manifold 44mm IDF open on the bench - max flow - 253CFM 40mm IDF + 32mm Chokes Stock manifold - 183CFM - estimated 40mm IDF + 34mm Chokes Stock manifold - 196CFM - Measured 44mm IDF + 36mm Chokes Stock manifold - 206CFM - Measured Ported manifold on the bench raw I did not run the bench up to full 28" capacity today - I just used a 10" drop and a comparative calculation Open manifold reference figure - 240CFM open Bolt on the carb open up the throttle and let it rip 44 IDF + 36mm Chokes Ported Manifold - 222CFM Measured The manifold mods have picked up 26 CFM So from the start point of 183CFM we are now at 222CFM an increase of 39CFM or 21% flow gain. I suspect that the total flow available will be greater than the 222CFM as the fixture I made does not enter the bench at the correct angle - I will open the fixture up to remove a step and then look at the flow again - there could be a few more CFM available but as we only have 253CFM from the carb available to us the gains would not be dramatic and for comparative flow the same restriction would have been there for the other carbs tests but due to the lower flows the restriction may not be so significant. Better start looking at getting a head on the bench.
|
|
Last Edit: Nov 24, 2018 18:42:28 GMT by Darkspeed
|
|
flyingphil
Posted a lot
Posts: 2,477
Member is Online
|
|
Nov 29, 2018 11:27:02 GMT
|
Impressive gains!
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
Nov 29, 2018 13:57:12 GMT
|
We are pretty pleased with the reward for the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! don't understand half of it but can appreciate what your doing,
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
Apr 25, 2019 11:15:30 GMT
|
Had a bit of time so spent an hour on the flowbench redoing a few tests on the Honda manifold. The adapter plate for the bench was only quickly drilled straight through at for the initial testing and was not quite the right profile/angle for the manifold so I took a carbide to the MDF and shaped it to remove a large step in order to give a better representation of the head/port. I also note above that I did not test the manifold with any radius - just the hard edge when I tested the flow at 240CFM. I stuck the 200CFM cal plate on and did a quick test to check the bench settings Fitted the manifold - and did an open test and the new adapter upped the flow to 256CFM. A full radius around the inlet increased the flow further to 284 CFM With a 44 IDF fitted at what the flow had increased significantly from the 222CFM @ 28" measured on the original adapter shape. Because its a different adapter this is not a comparison flow in regard to any modifications because if I had used this adapter in the first instance all of the flows would have been higher - What it does is give a final flow figure for the complete assembly of 236CFM @ 28"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 25, 2019 12:02:16 GMT
|
A great investment (of money, research, time) and that's just the flowbench, never mind the amount of time you've spent adding to this thread. Really interested to see the results (and what a difference tuning the various elements to punch as much air into the cylinder head as possible) too. Just a thought - could you increase this flow with the exhaust (pulling in air I mean) - I'm thinking along the lines of the Ford GT that used the pulses from the exhausts to help pull yet more air into the the engines. Even scavenging the old exchaust gases completely would help right? Sort of?
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
Apr 25, 2019 18:59:47 GMT
|
Exhaust is another aspect that feeds the system - it all needs to work together to delivery the best outcome.
|
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
Apr 28, 2022 19:43:54 GMT
|
The bench has been sat in a shed for quite some time. As I am moving things about it has provided a bit of space to drag it out of hiding and give it bit of a once over - Plan for new paint and a run up.
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
|
It has been a bit of a while since the bench was powered up and the laptop that runs the software is really getting pretty old - Windows 2000 ! - connected up the power and familiarised again with the set-up. Popped a 200 CFM calibration disc on and set the bench at 10" - with a 28" comparison setting Four motors on a minimal setting A few willing test subjects were gathered from the shed. 45 DC0E with 36mm chokes 40 Weber ITB CD 125 Stromberg CD 150 Stromberg I will also go grab a 40 DHLA to see how it compares with CD150 Just need to make a couple of bench adapters.
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
|
As way of a break from the Strato's I decided to test the Strombergs to get some flow figures and see what difference the little tweaks that had been made to the intake filter assemblies that were run on the racer. I made an adapter to take the small body Strombergs - It will get some paint to seal and protect it at a later date. As I was going to be testing at lower flow with the 1.25 and 1.5 choke sizes I put a 100CFM calibration plate - 1.18" on the bench and ran it up. With that done I dropped the CD125 on to see what it flows With no radius on the intake it made - 111 CFM @28" With full radius on the intake it made -118 CFM @28" Without With what - Did not type what - I typed W.O.T. without the dots and it was autocorrected - cannot abbreviate Wide Open Throttle on this board ! The CD150 was next With no radius on the intake it made - 169 CFM @28" With full radius on the intake it made -180 CFM @28" With what - Nope W.O.T. I then ran the CD 150 with the very nicely profiled Tufnol inlet piece that came off the racer assembly No obvious increase in flow over the Plasticine radius form Then did some further testing with the air filter - which was race dirty + 40 odd years of sitting in a box - I will try and give them a clean and see what they make as well. Dirty KN dropped the flow to 168 CFM @28" - 12CFM or a 7% reduction in flow capacity. Interestingly, for me at least, the same as the flow without a radius on the entry. Then tested the cone assembly Dropped the flow to 178CFM
|
|
Last Edit: May 3, 2022 8:50:41 GMT by Darkspeed
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
|
Cleaned the filter and put it back on the CD150 and it recovered 4CFM of flow - up to 172 CFM
With the CD125 dropped back on the bench with the clean filter it loses 4CFM of flow - 114CFM
I am going to have a chat with Capt Itchy and his 3D printing skills to draw up and print some CD125 and CD150 radiused inlets. Alss going to get some paper filters and see what the flow restriction is with those.
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
|
I was getting a bit too much variance on the bench so got some assistance with a well overdue calibration. It was getting a bit late to do any test runs at high depressions so that will have to wait for another day. Next task is to make a mount jig for an Imp manifold to see just how much it flows.
|
|
Last Edit: May 6, 2022 11:28:01 GMT by Darkspeed
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
May 25, 2022 11:11:10 GMT
|
Still need to do that manifold flow test but before that I have run some numbers on the bench for BMW K throttle bodies - these are lovely dinky little things 34mm bore. yoeddynz and biturbo228 tagged here K1000 ITB's One removed and a pair of typical pliers for scale ! Cobbled together a mount. Good enough to get a measurement So running the tests And then I had a play The ID of the trumpet is around 32mm - slightly smaller than the bore of the ITB and I expect this is all about torque. On the K series these ITBs are direct to head so very short distance to the valve - the trumpets in the airbox would pretty well double the inlet tract length - the trumpets are 175mm and overall the length from ITB/head interface to the trumpet intake is 260mm So there you go - oh and for the double length trumpet with strange expansion section - 158CFM @28" If you go back and have a look at the flow number on a 1.5" Stromberg and a 40mm IDF with 32mm venturi - you will see the numbers for those little ITB's is pretty impressive. They flow so well that you can sacrifice ultimate flow for some extra port length and flow velocity / mass flow.
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
May 25, 2022 16:02:57 GMT
|
Whilst doing the testing on the K ITB I figured it was worth spending the time to modify one of the mount plates for the Webcon DCOE style throttle body to see what that flows. Tested without a radius first as it has a nice large taper into the body - then for a bit of fun I dropped a F1 DFV trumpet onto it to see what it did. I have been given a few of these as they are not to the regs as they are oversize - therefore they did not get finished and the injector boss welded on the side. A bit of parcel tapes holds it on and covers the hole where the injector boss should sit As the trumpet picked up flow I then did flow with a radius Figures @28" Due to the generous taper there is not a huge gain with the stack or the radius - less than 2% but its a gain. They flow pretty well - I will drop a DCOE 45 on next for a comparison
|
|
Last Edit: May 25, 2022 16:06:32 GMT by Darkspeed
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,878
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
The Flowbench thread.Darkspeed
@darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member 39
|
May 25, 2022 16:56:14 GMT
|
To finish off the work on this so we can have all the figures for comparison I carried on. 45 DCOE with 36mm venturi/choke 40 DHLA with 30mm venturi/choke 40 DHLA with 32mm venturi/choke Due to the way the butterfly opens it was a bit of a pain on the jig. 45 DCOE - 36 40 DHLA - 30 40 DHLA - 32 Figures Easy to see how much more flow is available from a throttle body compared to a carb - take out all of those chokes and aux venturi's required to get the fuel atomised and there is much more space for the air.
|
|
|
|
flyingphil
Posted a lot
Posts: 2,477
Member is Online
|
|
May 26, 2022 21:27:51 GMT
|
Very interesting work - well done. Have you found any difference in flow rate between Weber and Dellorto carbs when they have the same set up, chokes etc?
|
|
|
|
|