|
|
Jan 15, 2007 17:00:19 GMT
|
I going 'with'.
For a very simple reason - they'll hopefully stop some clumsy oaf denting your lovely straight bodywork with their door after parking a bit too close.
|
|
Prius T-Spirit, Alfa 156 Sportwagon, Alfa 75 TSpark Veloce, Mazda MX-5 1.8iS Honda VFR750FT, Ducati 750SS, BMW R100RT, Hongdou GY200
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 15, 2007 17:03:00 GMT
|
Without - cars look so much cleaner without side trims
|
|
|
|
RetroMat
Posted a lot
Column Shifting!
Posts: 3,444
|
|
Jan 15, 2007 17:12:25 GMT
|
i went for with, it looks less sleeperish with out, if that makes any sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 15, 2007 17:17:12 GMT
|
Hmmm... It was a hard choise. But I went with 'without'
Just looks a little cleaner IMO.
Still looks good with them on though! ;D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 15, 2007 17:18:51 GMT
|
:)Looks good either way, but I'd leave 'em off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 15, 2007 17:35:34 GMT
|
With by a whisker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 15, 2007 21:11:01 GMT
|
Overriders ditched? well that one was easy Can I have them then? ;D Without - cars look so much cleaner without side trims Amazons are the exception though - the flanks look far too heavy without the trims, unless in a very high gloss, highly reflective colour ie black - Loon's is the only one I've seen which imho looked right without the trims
|
|
|
|
archieboy
Posted a lot
Volvo Amazon 2 door
Posts: 1,168
|
|
|
You may have them Paul, just the fronts i guess, will bring um to the next ace meet.
|
|
|
|
|
With or withoutRobinxr4i
@robinxr4i
Club Retro Rides Member 143
|
|
"with" cause IMO it look better.......
|
|
Sierra - here we go again! He has an illness, it's not his fault.
|
|
tofufi
South West
Posts: 1,458
|
|
|
With Oh, and I would keep the overriders too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"With" the trim, "Without" the Badge and overriders, I like it without as well, With screams Retro at me, especially on the those Steels Without feels as though its should have Big Chrome smoothie Rims or similar to really carry it off (IE as in "That" amazon estate) Depends what look you are ultimately aiming for ? Cool car whatever
|
|
|
|
dp
Posted a lot
DP Race Tech
Posts: 1,044
|
|
|
archieboy in da house: thought I would ask the experts, you lot!!
Damn that car is nice & straight. stick with it stock, leave everything on and just enjoy it, maybe just a tiny cut of the springs or a set of Volvo Rally springs if you can find them!!!!!
DP says: You can't correct perfection.....
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 16, 2007 9:40:25 GMT by dp
|
|
Bioshock
Posted a lot
It aint hip to be square.
Posts: 1,861
|
|
Jan 16, 2007 10:27:08 GMT
|
Without
|
|
Almera GTI = ugly bird who turns out to be great in the sack = Win
|
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2007 11:00:24 GMT
|
With.
It's too slab sided without the chrome. I'd keep the overiders too.
|
|
1962 Datsun Bluebird Estate - 1971 Datsun 510 SSS - 1976 Datsun 710 SSS - 1981 Dodge van - 1985 Nissan Cherry Europe GTi - 1988 Nissan Prairie - 1990 Hyundai Pony Pickup - 1992 Mazda MX5
|
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2007 11:02:03 GMT
|
down with chrome!
go sled-style
|
|
|
|
peachey
Part of things
Epitrochoidal Shaped Head
Posts: 177
|
|
Jan 16, 2007 11:03:55 GMT
|
with
|
|
Corollin' along
|
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2007 22:10:55 GMT
|
You may have them Paul, just the fronts I guess, will bring um to the next ace meet. Thank you, and yes just the fronts ;D I'll bring some beer tokens along too ;D When will your car make an appearance? Can't wait to see it in the metal
|
|
|
|
OSI
Part of things
Posts: 68
|
|
|
i think if you're gonna keep those wheels, put the trim back. If you're gonna get some new custom wheels, leave them off.
|
|
|
|
Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,542
|
|
Jan 17, 2007 10:34:16 GMT
|
I'm amused that if you were after a landslide vote in one direction to help you decide we haven't exactly helped! 33 plays 34 at the moment!
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
archieboy
Posted a lot
Volvo Amazon 2 door
Posts: 1,168
|
|
Jan 17, 2007 11:33:25 GMT
|
Yeah its been on the fence all the way well i tink i will stop the poll now and go with with ;D Thanks for all your input chaps, lots of good points, but as some say it has got rather large sides so needs to be broken up a bit
|
|
|
|
|