|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:09:19 GMT
|
" 4x4 drivers face huge charge rise Vehicles causing the most pollution in central London are to face huge increases in the congestion charge, Mayor Ken Livingstone has announced. The daily charge for 4x4s - is to rise from £8 to £25 from 2009. In 2008 the charge will be removed for cars in Bands A and B which produce the lowest emissions, Mr Livingstone said. The congestion charge scheme has been running since February 2003. The tax rose from £5 to £8 a day in July." Oh wounderful! So me and mates when we go to London in old battered Land Rover have to pay more than rich executive in his modern car! Isn't that really fair!
|
|
Last Edit: Nov 14, 2006 11:11:27 GMT by TwincamGTi
|
|
|
filmidget
East Midlands
Mostly Lurking
Posts: 1,652
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:15:03 GMT
|
I don't think they mean just actual 4x4's, but the higher groups that off road style 4x4's fall into... usual sloppy reporting. Are are they going to try to charge me more for my Quattro than the similar looking FWD Audi 90 sat next to it in the queue? Could you get a partial refund if you proved your Land Rover is running 2wd
|
|
'79 MG Midget 1500 - Still patiently awaiting attention '02 Vauxhall Astra 1.8 Elegance(!) - Better than you might think '03 Mazda MX5 - All new and shiny looking (thanks to Antony at Rust Republic) '09 Renault Clio - Needs to go.
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:16:01 GMT
|
as Alexei Sayle said
" i think its so important to have four wheel drive when your going to Sainsburys"
|
|
Someone just shot the elephant in the room.
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:16:23 GMT
|
Just like my green tax worries, we are all next. BBC experimented that pay as you drive on the news last night, a bloke paid £6* (+all usual costs petrol ins, tax etc) in pay as you go from rural-town, uses car for surveying had two jobs to go to. with taxi and train it worked out at £20. No win then I say! I'm beginning to hate this Country. So what if you dis engaged two of the wheels then is it cheapers, what about extra discount for one wheel drive? thers an idea ;D Edit. *breakdown: 2p per mile rural 5p P/M A roads, #35p/m in town (a right swer fest lost in inner city then! Fun Fun Fun!
|
|
it doesn't matter if it's a Morris Marina or a Toyota Celica - it's what you do with it that counts
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:23:02 GMT
|
Surely this can only be applied to new vehicles with that "efficiency rating" like you get on fridges and other white goods? That said, wasn't there suggestions that Livingstone was gonna ban all cars over 10 years old from the congestion zone anyway? TBH, I think taking a car into Central London is nuts. I understand some people have to do it due to the job they do though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:27:31 GMT
|
Believe me an old battered Land Rover IS just the vehicle for making sure non of the rep mobiles hassle you when going round Hyde Park corner! ;D Good point!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:30:29 GMT
|
WHAT !!!!!! WTF, Cough, spluter, **spits coffee over keyboard**!
|
|
|
|
Shortcut
Posted a lot
I won't be there when you cross the road, so always use the Green Cross Code.
Posts: 3,037
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:32:43 GMT
|
No it's by tax band not number of driven wheels. It's just that 90% of 4x4's fall into the higher tax brackets and that makes a easier headline than "some cars to pay more some to pay less depending on which tax band they fall into!" (screamed the Sun)
It may be that your landie falls into a lower tax bracket as they don't have huge engines. They do tend to pollute a bit though!
|
|
This space available to rent. Reach literally dozens of people. Cheap rates!
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:38:54 GMT
|
don't all older cars over 1.6 fall into the high band anyway? So the Landie will catch it either way.
Some/all "older" cars with the LPG conversion arn't CC excempt as LPG vehicles either.
A Mondeo V6 counts as a 4x4 for taxation purposes, its in the same emissions band.
I don't get what the big hatered of 4x4s is anyway, and lets try get the terminology right please people, SUVs. Pandas, Justys, Audi coupes etc. are all 4x4 as has already been mentioned.
If I want to go buy a Range Rover or a Blazer I will. I don't need to justify it by using it off road. Just like people who buy Porsches can do so without having to enter the 24 Heurs at Le Mans to justify haviung a high performance sports car. Allow one body style of vehicle to be pilliaried and others will follow.
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:52:55 GMT
|
WHAT !!!!!! WTF, Cough, spluter, **spits coffee over keyboard**! I can't remember where I read it... I could be talking utter rubbish! It might just have been one of those "think-tank" suggestions that the press hyped up. The new road tax laws confuse me... do 1.6 litre + cars get the highest amount of tax? Or are there higher bands for these newer least efficient new cars?
|
|
|
|
|
dp
Posted a lot
DP Race Tech
Posts: 1,044
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 11:58:21 GMT
|
twincamgti in da house: congestion charge scheme has been running since February 2003.
D*MN YOU GUYS!!!!!
Here in Stockholm on January 3 2006 we got Congestion Charges based on what was done in London, the first week trafic was down 20% and the City Council chered!!! only they forgot that most Swedes are off work untill January 9'th, sales in stores were down the first 2 months but picked up again in March, sure trafic went down a bit but not as much as expected, when the test ended on July 31 the City Council once again said it was a possitive result (figures can lie and liers can figure) and now it was up to the people living in and around Stockholm to vote Yes or No at the general election in September. At the elections it was an resounding NO to Congestion Charges and City Council said "OK no more" but then the Goverment said "alot of money was put into the project and not enogh time to evaluate so from February 1 (most likely) 2007 we'll restart it", WHAT IDIOTS!!!!!!
DP says: thanks to London I have to pay to visit with friends in Stockholm so you guys deserve what you get......
|
|
Last Edit: Nov 14, 2006 12:02:52 GMT by dp
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 12:03:59 GMT
|
now it was up to the people living in and around Stockholm to vote Yes or No at the general election in September. At the elections it was an resounding NO to Congestion Charges and City Council said "OK no more" but then the Goverment said "alot of money was put into the project and not enogh time to evaluate so from February 1 (most likely) 2007 we'll restart it", WHAT IDIOTS!!!!!! You're a damn sight closer to a democracy over there than we are it seems! There was (as far as I know) no public referendum on the London congestion charge... nor pretty much anything else. I see that the Swedish Government still manages to ignore the will of the people though
|
|
Last Edit: Nov 14, 2006 12:04:26 GMT by BenzBoy
|
|
MWF
Posted a lot
Posts: 2,945
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 12:04:54 GMT
|
If I want to go buy a Range Rover or a Blazer I will. I don't need to justify it by using it off road. Just like people who buy Porsches can do so without having to enter the 24 Heurs at Le Mans to justify haviung a high performance sports car. Allow one body style of vehicle to be pilliaried and others will follow. Well said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 12:06:06 GMT
|
Yes, Ken did want to stop all pre 1992 non-catalytic cars from entering the Congestion zone.
It was always a bit of a non-starter, particularly now the zone will extend to the classic car populated Kensington and Chelsea.
All those City bankers will be annoyed if they can't drive their pagoda SLs back from the Gloucestershire cottage!
TBH, the thing about 4wds is London is mainly due to envy/dislike of the drivers, and some do drive so badly/selfishly you can kind of see Ken's POV.
Also there is a disgusting new US disease called the stretched SUV now spreading to this country, all of which need to be crushed at point of import on several grounds, most importantly taste!
|
|
|
|
dp
Posted a lot
DP Race Tech
Posts: 1,044
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 12:10:30 GMT
|
benzboy in da house: I see that the Swedish Government still manages to ignore the will of the people though
Well yes and no!!! As of 3 years ago (if I remember right) all out nuclear power plants should be closed down since most Swedes voted YES to this (I voted NO) in a public referendum back in the 70's but thie'r still "closing down" the plants today.....
DP says: I guess a bit of tyranni is a part of a functioning democracy......
|
|
Last Edit: Nov 14, 2006 12:11:45 GMT by dp
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 12:13:44 GMT
|
a bit harsh DP! We didn't want it either!
This just means that more cars will be cloned to avoid the charges, the already overcrowded tube system will be stretched even further. The city will be harder to police with more pedestrians and hey, this brings us back to the good old "terrorism" angle, how are you going to catch terrorists using your fancy new ANPR cameras if you've forced everyone out of their cars?
Next step - numberplates for pedestrians, extra charges for people who walk slowly or have a wheelchair.
I support pay-per-mile systems as I rarely use a car on a day-to-day basis, about 50% of my journeys are pointless or could be avoided in some way but at the moment, I've paid my tax so why not drive places? I'd rather scrap RFL and flatrate insurance and the twelvety million percent duty on fuel and whap it all on a per-mile scale depending on roads.
HOWEVER, £25 to simply cross a invisible line going into a city is absurd! It's got nothing to do with pollution as people don't drive into london to do laps and sightsee, they drive in to park up so a mega-engined 4x4 will use barely more fuel than a fiat panda in that day. They'd rather all these executives with their BMW X5's and Discoveries buy a little car for commuting would they? How much pollution does the manufacturing of another car release? And don't get me started on public transport, it's unreliable and dirty.
|
|
Never trust a man Who names himself Trevor. Or one day you might find He's not a real drug dealer.
|
|
Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,538
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 12:14:48 GMT
|
DP says: thanks to London I have to pay to visit with friends in Stockholm so you guys deserve what you get...... Yeah, but but but...... you guys gave us Volvos! The congestion charge will only annoy me if when they expand the times it operates into evenings and weekends and spoil the fun of cruising round the city in a cool car in the summer months. Though having said that the western expansion is utterly ridiculous asit is primarily (v expensive) residential. It is basically bringing a lot of wealthy people into the zone who will therefore now be able to get massive discounts and so can drive into the centre as much as they like Having not had a car for the past year one of my clients who lives in the new area will be getting one as a result. All these changes might not occur if Ken gets voted out.
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 12:19:07 GMT
|
Though having said that the western expansion is utterly ridiculous asit is primarily (v expensive) residential. It is basically bringing a lot of wealthy people into the zone who will therefore now be able to get massive discounts and so can drive into the centre as much as they like Having not had a car for the past year one of my clients who lives in the new area will be getting one as a result. Except under the new scheme, anyone who owns a vehicle in the highest band (like a Range Rover.....or a 1.8 Passat) not only has to pay £25 a day, they get no discount for being a resident...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 12:21:05 GMT
|
I worked in the power industry for a couple of years. You can;t just go flip a switch and shut down a nuclear power station. Even if you do things on schedule it would take a long time. Add to this the usual inefficiency of government programmes and the fact that they probably forgot they'd need to comission new hydro, oil, coal or gas stations to replace them (which can take a whopping 20 years to build and commission here in the UK due to public consultations on their location, planning restrictions, etc.) and you can see that it could take 20 or more years to get out of nuclear after you make the decission.
I don;t think Ken cares what city bankers think. He only cares what he thinks. I think if he could pee off classic car owners he would because thats what he likes to do.
To dislike SUVs because some owners drive them badly is daft, because bad drivers will drive badly regardless of what they have. Volvos, BMWs, Mercedes estates and even Triumph Stags have been "hated" cars due to the people who own them over the years, just from my recollection.
I think what a lot of people don't like is the fact that - "there is soemone who obviously has more money than me and is flaunting the fact in my face."
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
|
Nov 14, 2006 12:22:21 GMT
|
Oh and... 7 other UK cities are actively seeking to introduce thier own congestion charge, including Nottingham.
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|