RobinJI
Posted a lot
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
Jun 27, 2011 18:00:49 GMT
|
Hey guys, I'm picking up a new daily next week to replace the MX-5 as I'm after something a bit more practical. The new car's a Volvo 240 GLT estate, and I'm really looking forward to it, but..... My circumstances have just changed, and I've decided I am going to go to uni this year in the end, which means the big old Volvo's drinking habit is a bit of an issue. As such I'll be looking to stick a diesel lump in it at some point over the summer. I reckon if I can scrape 41.5mpg, then for every £100 I spend on it it'll take 1000 miles to pay for its self, which is fine by me. Now the powerplant that makes the most sense to me, and can be made to fit the rear drive set-up of the Volvo would be the 2.1tdi pulled from a 406, not much lower bhp than the standard volvo lump, more torque, and from what I've seen of the lump in a mates 406, they get respectable MPG in the big pug even when towing and loaded up, so shouldn't have an issue with the Volvo, and they seem cheap and easy enough to find. Now I've been told that these engines will bolt up to an LDV gearbox to get them in a RWD car, but what I need to know is which LDV gearbox, any ideas of what I need to be phoning around the breakers yards and asking? Also any info on the ratios would be awesome. This is all just ideas at the moment, and I'm welcome to suggestions of other engines that'd be cheaper, easier or better for the job. Cheers, Robin. Pictures The Swedish barge in question: The powerplant in question (or an example of):
|
|
Last Edit: Jun 27, 2011 18:19:32 GMT by RobinJI
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2011 18:30:45 GMT
|
not sure which code or name the box used by LDV has, but it'll be bolted to a pug engine in a Pilot/200, not sure if they were used in the Convoy/400.
|
|
|
|
RobinJI
Posted a lot
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
Jun 27, 2011 18:32:53 GMT
|
Ah awesome, cheers, that gives me a good starting point at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2011 20:00:21 GMT
|
LDV convoy uses a ford engine - gearbox won't bolt-up. You need a gearbox from an LDV Pilot, they pretty much exclusively use the XUD9 (1.9 non-turbo XUD engine) I'm currently putting a XUD11 (the 2.1) into my Reliant scimitar, using a Pilot gearbox. By far, the easiest way to get it fitted, is to get the whole engine/gearbox from a Pilot, make it fit, and just run it, to sort out any niggles. Trying to turbo the non-turbo XUD is a VERYbad idea! Would spit its conrods out the side of the block after anything more than mild boost/power To make a XUD engine fit, you'd need: # LDV spigot bearing (I got mine for less than a fiver from a DAF dealer) Different size compared to the normal pug/citroen spigot bearing. # Either the Pilot flywheel + clutch, which limits you to the smaller non-turbo clutch. Or, use a pug 306 HDi flywheel, along with the HDi pressure plate, and a clutch that's 228mm diameter,with a 23 spline centre. The clutch from a Ford Galaxy seems to fit the bill quite nicely, but I'm using one from a 1600 Capri (225mm, close enough) If you try to use the standard XUD style flywheel, the pressure plate is a PULL to release style - which means you'll never be able to disengage the clutch . The HDi setup, and the LDVsetup, use the normal PUSH to release, setup. # The clutch release is hydraulic, using the same slave cylinder as a Reliant Scimitar (and more than likely, a million other cars) # The engine support brackets - you can either do as I have, and make use of the existing mounts,or get the cast-iron brackets that bolt to the side of the LDV Pilot engine, and then use a more common setup of one mount either-side of the engine. # the propshaft is the very common Ford design, so many props actually bolt straight up! Obviously, get an older engine, as it's more likely to have a Bosch fuel pump - the lucas ones aren't particularly strong, and whilst I have the 2.1 engine - it's nowhere near as common as the 1.9s, and there's not that much difference in power and a link to my build thread retrorides.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=readersrides&thread=103235&page=4
|
|
Last Edit: Jun 27, 2011 20:04:15 GMT by chairchild
You're like a crazy backyard genius!
|
|
RobinJI
Posted a lot
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
Jun 27, 2011 21:50:27 GMT
|
Awesome cheers, I'm not wanting to mod the engine at all, just want to slap in a 2.1 from a 406 as it was intended, as un-modified as possible. Thanks for all the flywheel and stuff info, that's a big help, a decent clutch would be a bonus so I'm not worried to tow stuff.
Any idea if any of the 2.1's came with a bosch pump?
Hydraulic clutch is good, as the Volvo's hydro, so should just be a case of playing with slave/master sizes.
I'd actually forgotten about the prop-shaft, that'll be an unfortunate expense unless I'm extremely lucky.
Cheers for all the info, given me plenty to think about, sounds like I'll be searching the local scrappys/breakers for a 306/406hdi, 406 2.1tdi, and an LDV Pilot. In fact if the electrics aren't too awful is there anything stopping me just putting in the HDI lump? they seem good engines.
|
|
|
|
tdipd
Part of things
Posts: 121
|
|
Jun 27, 2011 22:32:45 GMT
|
Most 2.1tds came with the lucas semi-ecu controlled tripe, The older 2.1tds in xms and 605 have a better chance of having an all mechanical bosch pump. If you cannot find an older style 2.1td pump without the electrical curse word then you can bolt on the bosch fuel pump from a 1.9td, this is tried and tested. Will run with it.
|
|
Last Edit: Jun 27, 2011 22:39:36 GMT by tdipd
|
|
Tim
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,340
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 13:12:18 GMT
|
The 2.1 is a good engine, but you are likely to struggle to get much more than 40 mpg out it if my 406 was anything to go by
|
|
|
|
RobinJI
Posted a lot
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 16:29:49 GMT
|
The 2.1 is a good engine, but you are likely to struggle to get much more than 40 mpg out it if my 406 was anything to go by Oh right, a good friend of mine has a 2.1tdi estate and that thing manages 40+ consistently even with him driving like a tit all the time. Got 34 towing a Metro to Germany and back, plus it's on 207000 miles. It does help that I/we live in a rural area, so most miles are on fast flowing open a-roads. Might have to think about a 1.9 to make it more worth while, but I don't want to be having to thrash it everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 16:38:06 GMT
|
For what it's worth, up until the point I put in a very cheeky bid on that Iveco lump, I'd settled on this conversion for mine... I had a bit of a PM conversation with Jrevillug about it, and everything he said to me as theory and educated guesses has since been confirmed by Chairchild in his thread Excellent conversion idea
|
|
...proper medallion man chest wig motoring.
|
|
Tim
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,340
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 16:39:46 GMT
|
From my experience, the 2.1 is a much nicer setup than the 1.9.
It never went BELOW 40 either mind :-)
|
|
|
|
|
RobinJI
Posted a lot
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 16:46:48 GMT
|
Cool, yeah, from being in my friends 406 it does seem a really nice engine, noticeably quicker and smoother than the 1.9. Wiring may be interesting, I know nothing about Peugeots, so I don't know how separate the engine and car looms are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 19:36:34 GMT
|
totally separate body / engine looms, quite simple on the xud's too nothing stopping you fitting a HDi lump actually, you'd need to use a pre-multiplex ecu+loom to save a lot of work, but physically they're damn close to the xud's. for fuel supply you'd just need some form of electric lift pump to supply fuel at around 3 bar to the high pressure unit that's timing belt driven. LOTS of mods available for them, BMW HP pumps, remaps and bigger intercoolers seems to be the most common ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 19:50:14 GMT
|
one more thing - if you do as I did, and get one from an XM, you'll need to source a vacuum pump for it, as the XM used their weird hydraulic system for te suspension, steering, AND the brake assistance! No vacuum servo = no vacuum pump fitted to engine! Annoyingly, I'm in the situation of getting around that, lol non-assisted brake for me!
|
|
You're like a crazy backyard genius!
|
|
RobinJI
Posted a lot
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 21:41:55 GMT
|
Cheers again, engine will most likely come from a 406, as they're at prime scrap-yard fodder age/value at the moment, and common as muck.
After a quick browse on parkers the HDI's are quoted as getting 49mpg, vs the 2.1td at 39 (both in 406 estates), so a HDI may well be worth seriously looking at. As long as the box mounts up ok it sounds like it'd almost be an easier swap, as I could keep the standard flywheel and pressure plate.
When you say pre-multiplex ecu and loom would this limit me to the 90bhp version?
Edit, according to wikipedia, the 90 and 110bhp HDI's were both available in 406's as of 1999, which would suggest to me they were an optional thing, rather than an age thing, so logic would suggest that a pre-multiplex 110 exists.
|
|
Last Edit: Jun 28, 2011 21:48:04 GMT by RobinJI
|
|
dog296
Part of things
Posts: 302
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 21:48:49 GMT
|
main differ between the XUD9 and XUD11 is the XUD9 rev's alot better, and are alot more common for parts.
The XUD11 doesn't rev all that great, but does produce a little more torque.
|
|
|
|
tdipd
Part of things
Posts: 121
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 21:49:17 GMT
|
HDi would be a very difficult swap, everything is ECU controlled.
|
|
|
|
dog296
Part of things
Posts: 302
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 21:57:01 GMT
|
HDi's are also curse word!
Get a XUD9 (1.9) Bosch it, tweak it, and enjoy 60+ MPG... thats what I;m doing.
|
|
|
|
RobinJI
Posted a lot
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 21:59:11 GMT
|
How does the ECU control make the swap any harder?
I'll be using the donor cars engine loom whatever, it doesn't really bother me if this includes an ECU or not as long as it doesn't need matching to an immobiliser in the car loom or anything along those lines.
|
|
|
|
dog296
Part of things
Posts: 302
|
|
Jun 28, 2011 22:07:13 GMT
|
the HDi had a imboliser transponder on the igntion, so you'll need that too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29, 2011 12:59:52 GMT
|
I'm guessing from the comment of you'll be using the donor loom - you've never had the misfortune of playing with french electrics? The Loom on my XM had 3 colours - grey, blue, and orange. That's it. Trying to splice the loom into another car is going to end in tears, and frustration. A bosch pump needs a singular wire - a switched 12v feed. I'll let you figure out which one is easier
|
|
You're like a crazy backyard genius!
|
|
|