86mike
Part of things
Posts: 453
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 16:41:59 GMT
|
I know dump valves are chavy n stuff but I'm told that they can have benefits for turbo life and performance. My Audi doesn't come with one as standard and I was wondering if there was any point to fitting one? The quattro guys seem to think it's a huge waste of time but others think it's a sensible upgrade. What do you guys think? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
goldnrust
West Midlands
Minimalist
Posts: 1,872
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 17:48:39 GMT
|
Can or worms, opened!
Essentially the point of the dump valve is to improve turbo life. Snapping the throttle stuck can cause a pressure spike in the intake, which then tries to back flow through the compressor housing. This puts a large amount of stress on the shaft and bearings of the turbo. Some turbos are strong enough to deal with this surging and some aren't. Generally after market turbos are stronger than factory fit turbos.
The other thing, slightly more debatable, is that a well set-up dump valve can improve throttle response on quick gear changes. The theory is that by releasing just the right amount of pressure you keep the turbo itself spinning fast and so it spools quicker when you snap the throttle back open.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 19:09:57 GMT
|
I wondered about dump valves and when i asked over on the volvo forum the guys said it had a factory fit recirculating one which would need blanking off first. Also the ECU measures the fuel depending on airflow so if you dump to atmosphere after the MAF the car will run rich. I'm not ashamed to say I like the noise so i'll probably fit one anyway, its no different to guys fitting bigger wheels or noisier exhausts than they really need. Dump valves are not chavy, its just some people are snobby about these things.
|
|
Volvo back as my main squeeze, more boost and some interior goodies on the way.
|
|
MK2VR6
Posted a lot
Mk2 Golf GTi 90 Spec
Posts: 3,328
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 19:16:56 GMT
|
Not sure about petrols, but pretty confident most turbo diesels have dump valves as standard. Can hear the chatter on my Audi and the missus' daily Dub tdis.
|
|
|
|
sparkyt
Posted a lot
selling stuff
Posts: 1,767
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 19:20:46 GMT
|
Which audi is it bud ? .. I found a little page on a J forum a few years back which helped me no end .. they take the stalled air off the back of the turbo as the throttle closes . 1 you can vent it 2 you can return it . I chose to reuse the air Put the dump valve as close as you can to the throttle and run the vent to just before the turbo pointing at it This has the benefit of keeping the air in the pipe work moving in the correct direction It blowes the turbo around and helps anti stall and keeps the pulse off the turbo from thr throttle closing ..
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
Stupid dump valve questionluckyseven
@luckyseven
Club Retro Rides Member 45
|
Sept 23, 2012 19:30:03 GMT
|
Lol, sooooooo much mystery and intrigue, fact and misinformation on this one subject, you could probably open an entire new internetz just on this alone ;D Short answer is no, modern turbo build quality being what it is, you don't need to run a dump valve. Nothing will break because you don't, though wear might, and I emphasize might, be accelerated on turbo bearings by a minuscule amount. It'll take so long that they'll have banned internal combustion engines before you really notice. Most cars do indeed run some sort of recirculating valve as standard, generally plumbed back into the airbox somewhere. If you need dump valve whooshing noises in your life you can usually just vent the factory one to atmosphere instead of muffling it with the induction system, so long as it doesn't give your ECU mutant boost leak head****s The "chatter" often mistakenly called "wastegate chatter" is in fact nothing of the sort. A wastegate's basically like a massive poppet valve; in no way does it chatter. It's either open or shut. What the fluttering noise is, is in fact a momentary stall or backwash of air in the compressor housing of the turbo being chopped up by the vanes of the compressor wheel as they continue turning. There's no proven evidence that this really affects the turbo's longevity or performance in any way, as the OP noted, many modified cars don't use them and most rally teams don't bother with dump valves and that stuff at all and run monster boost without their turbos grenading every five minutes. Bottom line is if you like the noise, fit one because it'll do no harm at all. If you don't or prefer the flutter noise, don't fit one because it'll errrr... almost certainly do no harm at all. If performance of the turbo is paramount, think about more free-flowing manifolds or wastegate housings, especially if the wastegate is a restrictive internal one. Boost creep will kill more than just the turbo quick as anything... Fortunately, on my FD the turbo is a ported shroud one so it flutters, whistles and makes more bizarre noises than a whole herd of R2 units, plus I still get dumpvalve whoosh too I just wish I could hear it above the exhaust EDITED FOR PITIFULLY BAD SPELING
|
|
Last Edit: Sept 23, 2012 19:33:49 GMT by luckyseven
|
|
sparkyt
Posted a lot
selling stuff
Posts: 1,767
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 19:33:36 GMT
|
The pipe in green returns the air to the turbo .. the green arrows show air flow and the stalled air will be kept to a minimum ..
|
|
|
|
sparkyt
Posted a lot
selling stuff
Posts: 1,767
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 19:34:42 GMT
|
Win win ..
|
|
|
|
86mike
Part of things
Posts: 453
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 19:56:38 GMT
|
Thanks for the replys guys, It's a "UR" quattro from 86 by the way. So as far as I can see unless I'm really hammering my turbo on the track or something there isn't a huge benefit although it does sounds quite cool :-) Think I've finally got a handle what they actually do now :-) Have some Treser weirdness as thanks!
|
|
Last Edit: Sept 23, 2012 20:01:04 GMT by 86mike
|
|
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 20:21:47 GMT
|
that audi looks the tits!! ive had tonnes of turbos and never had one and never had a problem, always 20psi plus boost
|
|
cars: orion 1600 i ghia mk2 orion 2.2 vtec ghia mk1
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 21:18:30 GMT
|
Saabs are fitted as standard with a recirc valve. The forums say fitting an atmospheric one makes no difference whatsoever except it's louder. I have a Forge recirc valve rather than standard but it does make a whoosh, however it's quite a nice quiet little thing. You can here it with the radio off if you're accelerating fairly hard, or with the window open. Otherwise it's silent, gives you the best of both worlds.
In a Quattro you could get away with a big whooshy atmospheric, in a battered old Saab you'd like like a muppet though.
|
|
Last Edit: Sept 23, 2012 21:18:53 GMT by oli8925
Project Diary1975 Viva / 1988 T25 Camper / 1989 Mini / 1991 MX5 / 1992 Mini / 1994 Saab 9000 / 1997 Saab 9000 / 2008 Saab 9-5
|
|
sparkyt
Posted a lot
selling stuff
Posts: 1,767
|
|
Sept 23, 2012 21:49:24 GMT
|
Don't think of NEEDING one think every little helps
.. if your turbo stalls you get lag as it takes time to start spinning back up .. this helps the turbo spin freely when the throttle is closed ready for when you stamp on the gas the turbo is already to go .. less lag between gear changes ...
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
Stupid dump valve questionluckyseven
@luckyseven
Club Retro Rides Member 45
|
Sept 24, 2012 7:40:17 GMT
|
A turbo spins at several tens of thousands of rpm. It doesn't just stall. It may slow down a bit, but try driving with and without a dump valve and honestly assessing the difference in spool response and I guarantee you'll be unable to notice the difference. I've tried it, and there is no difference. There's the argument that emptying the induction tract of pressurised air by venting it to atmosphere every time the throttle's backed off will have more of a detrimental effect on boost response times than letting the compressed air surge back in the compressor housing marginally. As already said, fit one if you like them, don't if you don't is the only real decision that needs be made
|
|
|
|
86mike
Part of things
Posts: 453
|
|
Sept 24, 2012 9:55:23 GMT
|
So I'm guessing the main reason then is protecting the turbo rather than increasing performance significantly. I was thinking it also give the risk of boost leaks.
|
|
Last Edit: Sept 24, 2012 9:56:53 GMT by 86mike
|
|
gib
Part of things
Posts: 163
|
|
Sept 24, 2012 16:10:24 GMT
|
@ oli8925. Arrow top left hand corner Outside view, never too bothered on how it looks as it works and is relatively fast point to point. (leaves singing that song).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 25, 2012 22:38:24 GMT
|
excellent replies luckyseven - you've said the exact same things I would! And another little titbit.. NO diesels have dumpvalves. Recirc, Venting,or otherwise. Besides some more modern dervs, which have a throttle that partially closes to improve EGR gas flow, they generally have NO throttle at all. They always run with an excess of air, and when you take your foot off the throttle, it's merely injecting less fuel (not restricting airflow like on a petrol) Running a dumpvalve on a derv, is just going to hurt throttle response
|
|
You're like a crazy backyard genius!
|
|
|
|
Sept 25, 2012 22:49:03 GMT
|
I was going to use an atmospheric dump valve but it occurred to me that I've paid for that boost and there is no way I'm dumping it straight out so I'm using a recirculating one now. The RS500 intercooler is probably too big for the turbo so I need to keep it full of air! Yea yea yea I can get a smaller IC but who wants a titchy IC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 27, 2012 21:10:18 GMT
|
Gib> When I said Saab I was thinking of my battered old 9000. If the engine was to a really high state of tune I might get away with it, but not as it is. I'd look like someone that wished they had an Impretzle and only bought the Saab because it had a turbo.
The 99 is a whole different kettle of fish, I love the things. You can definitely get away with it in that because it looks like some mad old monster from the 80's.
|
|
Project Diary1975 Viva / 1988 T25 Camper / 1989 Mini / 1991 MX5 / 1992 Mini / 1994 Saab 9000 / 1997 Saab 9000 / 2008 Saab 9-5
|
|
|
|
|
A turbo spins at several tens of thousands of rpm. It doesn't just stall. Just to make one tiny point, I work with aircraft turbine engines and it is possible to stall a compressor, but it is a momentary condition for the tiniest split second... You are correct, it is impossible for the compressor spool to be brought to a complete stop instantly by air pressure but it can be slowed almost to a standstill and this is compressor stall. Admittedly on aero engines this normally happens due to other issues and the pressure differences are significantly larger and hence it is possible to slow the compressor much more and much faster. Balancing the marginal slowing of the compressor against the "cost" of refilling/re-pressurising the intake between compressor and throttle body I think the improvement is going to be small, as stated previously. One other thing, don't forget that because the turbine and compressor wheels are on the same spool, any increase in resistance in the compressor will cause an increase in resistance for the exhaust gas to pass the turbine... Again, all of this is marginal and there are several ways of implementing a dump valve, this thread gives plenty of info, time to make a decision
|
|
|
|