judgie
Part of things
wanaba stig
Posts: 274
|
|
|
taken from the www.fbhvc.co.uk/news/index.htmFIVA agree on 'Historic' vehicle definition At the annual FIVA General Assembly held in Brussels in October, part of the agenda was dedicated to finalising a definition of a ‘historic’ vehicle, a hot topic for a number of years. The wording agreed is: FIVA defines a historic vehicle as a mechanically propelled road vehicle: which is at least 30 years old; which is preserved and maintained in a historically correct condition; which is not used as a means of daily transport; and which is therefore a part of our technical and cultural heritage. This definition is important for a number of reasons, but mostly for political lobbying purposes. For example, the EU Commission have given indications that while they are happy to consider legislative exemptions for a reasonably small number of vehicles, used for relatively low mileages, they would become concerned if the number of vehicles or the mileage they covered grew too large. It is hoped that by lifting the defined age to 30 and excluding vehicles used for daily transport, this will be avoided. The new definition will be officially effective for FIVA in 2010, but it will start to be used for some purposes immediately. Its adoption by FIVA does not mean that individual countries will use it for all purposes, and members may be assured that FBHVC will not cease to represent the interests of vehicles it currently covers. lot more info on there and it don't make good reading. now i'm all for proper legal us of any vehicle on the road but having some bloke the eu goverment telling me when and how i can use my historic car is not on. cheers rob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmm... I've seen this before and not mentioned it as there is no indication that the UK will take it up.
Frankly I don't want my car declared some kind of "historic hobby thing" class. This is why I was originally arguing against the free road tax. I expect to be able to use any car I own on a daily basis, for commuting or for business. I expect to be able to maintain it in an "unauthentic" fashion to suit my needs.
If this means I have to pay road tax to do so then, meh. I'd rather not but its a difficult argument to make that a daily driven car should get free road tax. But then I think my views on road tax being free for all are well known but again, meh.
Of course these definitions probably have no bearing on road tax, the tax office themselves have a defintion of a classic car being 30 years old and worth no less than £10,000 or something. Its a definition used in depreciation and asset value excemption stuff.
It may well be that this "defintion" is used to excempt people from certain "black boxes" for road charging in the future or whatever.
Many EU nations have no definitions of "classic/historic" at all, so they have to start somewhere.
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 5, 2009 9:51:15 GMT by akku
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
v8lee
Posted a lot
FoMoCoMoFo
Posts: 1,045
|
|
|
Sounds like an attempt to categorise as an attempt to either increase revenue from or (more likely) restrict the use of anything older than 30 years old.
It would also seem to point towards only vehicles fitting into this category being classified as "historic", whilst anything else which is either less than 30 years but more than say 3, 5 or 10 years being legislated off the road completely for environmental or other such made up reasons.
Anything which has been modified or altered from the manufacturer's specifications in any way must also be in the gunsights.
Like AK, I value my right to drive what I want, when I want regardless of age, specification but not roadworthyness. All that is required, then, is a stringent (but reasonable) MOT inspection?
|
|
No more old cars
|
|
|
|
|
I think its so that there is a convenient get out for new legislation. For example
All cars (except "Historic Vehicles") must be fitted with a GPS device for active road tolling
or
All cars (except "historic vehicles") must be fitted with emissions equipment to meet such-and-such standard
or
All cars (except historic vehicles) must display EU standard number plate as defined in standard blah blah blah
which (as you say) could make life difficult either
1. for people with modern classics which don't hit the historic definition but are hard to convert to the new specs or equipment
2. people with 30+ year old cars they want to continue to daily drive or modify.
However, no sign as yet of this being used for any legal purpose in the UK.
But next time a politician talks about "a historic vehicle" we know exactly what they mean, whether we agree with the defintion or not, its there in black & white.
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
|
|
It's a tricky one, but not necessarily bad. How about "All vehicles (except historic vehicles) must be fitted with satellite-tracking speed limiters?"
As you say though Akku, given that "historic" seems to mean "barely used," it doesn't bode well for those of us using classics every day. Though when oil disappears (which it will do one day) that won't help either.
|
|
1986 Citroen 2CV Dolly Other things. Check out my Blog for the latest! www.hubnut.org
|
|
|
|
|
internal combustion engines can be run on a variety of alternative fuels including, but not limited to ethanol, methanol, hydrogen, methane, propane, and complex compounds based on other chemicals. The real reason we need oil in our cars is to lubricate them, not sure where the synthetic technology has got to on that (so-called synthetic oils we use today are still petrolchemical - based on oil)
I wouldn't want an electronic speed limiter on my car, but on a carb fed lump how hard could it be to bypass it? ;D
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 5, 2009 14:23:22 GMT by akku
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
dugong
Posted a lot
One Of Us Will Live To Rue The Day We Met Each Other (Wire : 2008)
Posts: 3,292
|
|
|
I wouldn't want an electronic speed limiter on my car, but on a carb fed lump how hard could it be to bypass it? ;D Piece of curse word. I have a massive hammer ;D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A friend on another forum replied with something that's worth bearing in mind, especially for those that instantly get the wrong end of the stick, or negative about it:
|
|
|
|
|
more eu messingmaskedavenger
@GUEST
|
|
ITS DIFFICULT NOT TO BE NEGATIVE WHERE THE GOVERMENT ARE CONCERNED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, very true that
|
|
|
|
|
|
more eu messingDeleted
@Deleted
|
|
i've said it before they can fit these so called gadgets to my cars as long as A: they pay for them to be fitted without any damage being caused to my cars . B: they don't moan when said gadgets stop working (due to no fault of my own honest osifer ) after all old cars are inherently unreliable or so they keep telling us ;D and C: they don't interfere with any cars performance when at a track but if they start telling people what and when i can drive all they will achieve is to annoy people after all i never aggreed to be in the EU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
^What he said, if they want me to have one, they can pay for it (or er, 32....)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just to make a pedantic and somewhat OT point here, although the EU "harmonisation" of these sort of regulations garners a lot of attention, these things are in reality little if anything to do with the EU as other countries which are not even on the same continent are proposing/doing similar things. Whether we are in the EU or not has no bearing on the overall direction which taxation/environment/transport/etc. policy takes. Its convenient for many politicians to give the impression its all down to the EU, but thats only like when I make an unpopular decission at work I tell people its the directors making me do it even if it were my idea...
I'd take issue with the part of the statement which says "It has been crystallised, as said above, by the NEED to react to impending emissions regulations in 2010, which would effectively outlaw ALL classic vehicles and have them taken off the road."
Rephrase the legislation then. We have *never* retrospectively applied emissions restrictions on older or existing vehicles so this is new legislation, new rules and this is probably the most concerning element of the whole deal. The implication of this statement is that any car which is less than 30 years old and cannot meet 2010 emissions standards will be banned off the road. Can that be right?
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
v8lee
Posted a lot
FoMoCoMoFo
Posts: 1,045
|
|
|
AK I think that's the gyst of it.
Now imagine the following scenario:
* Government decides that from (say) Jan 1st, 2010 all new cars must have a tracker fitted and it is illegal to remove it. * Government legislates that no vehicle over 5 years old can be driven on the road (unless "historic" (see above for definition)) because of environmental blah blah blah... * Hey Presto! By 2015 all cars are under 5 years old and have a tracker fitted. Any vehicle without a tracker is illegal, apart from legitimately historic ones which are severely restricted in their use.
Maybe I'm paranoid, but I am absolutely convinced that older vehicles will be legislated off our roads within the next few years.
|
|
No more old cars
|
|
|
|
|
Time to flag out methinks! Anybody know how to register a vehicle (light commercial, class7 MOT here) in Lithuania?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now imagine the following scenario: thats exactly the scenario I had imagined already. I don't much like it. I don't see any proposals which would actually bring that about. But it is far from inconceivable. I can also see that most of the public would broadly back that kind of programme if sold to them with sufficient "ecological" and "safety" spin. Doubtless "helping our economy recover from recession" as well.
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
|
|
"1984" anyone?
Orwell was a few years out but the rest of it is coming true bit by bit.
Not that I want to sound negative or anything....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"1984" anyone? Orwell was a few years out but the rest of it is coming true bit by bit. Not that I want to sound negative or anything.... Watch 'V for Vendetta' and be scared, be very scared........
|
|
Rover Metro - The TARDIS - brake problems.....Stored Rover 75 - Barge MGZTT Cdti 160+ - Winter Hack and Audi botherer... MGF - The Golden Shot...Stored Project Minion........ Can you see the theme?
|
|
murran
Part of things
Posts: 610
|
|
|
its all rubbish spin from brussels. next week the're all guna sit down and discuss how every member of the eu needs to have the correct size of nipple....... they'll measure all their own nipple sizes, take an average of the results. then theyll try to pass some legislation that states every one with un average nipples must wear a tracking device or have their nipples sugically altered to be average....... if they come near my nipples (or my car, with a catalyst and a tracking device) ill break their faces!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh FFS. Can we bin this silly "governments are all evil" talk and get back to the cars? Compared to other places in the world, we've got NOTHING to complain about really.
|
|
1986 Citroen 2CV Dolly Other things. Check out my Blog for the latest! www.hubnut.org
|
|
|