|
|
Jan 22, 2008 18:19:25 GMT
|
Went to drop the trailer wheels of to have new tyres I bought fitted, and when I was done with that, I saw a sign that read "Graham X" "Classic motorcar Engineer" So I walked over to see what he was about, he also had this Jag on his drive, and was just busy replacing his very Sexy Thatcham approved alarm system, which had conked out this week. He also has customers Bay window bus, Lancia and some other Italian exotica in the shop at pressent. Oh and he smokes a pipe In short, remote central locking, ABS etc...... and a fairly modern 3.2litre Jag motor in the bay. Good as it id now for 210bhp plus. He reckons it works just fine ;D ;D ;D Enjoy.
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 22, 2008 18:21:08 GMT by grizz
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2008 19:04:50 GMT
|
Blimey thats a squeeze!
|
|
Resident Toyota Geek Current Fleet: HDJ81 Landcruiser, GZ20 Soarer, JZX81 Cresta
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2008 19:20:29 GMT
|
coool car. that would be a nice sunday cruizer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2008 19:25:20 GMT
|
i really love stuff like this, leave the exterior and interior alone, just modernise mechanical bits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2008 19:26:20 GMT
|
It is his daily driver, and he has no issue driving it up to the North over a weekend. First problem he had was when the insurance required alarm system self destructed.
Forgot, has modern gearbox from I think XJ40 or summat as well.
Asked him about the bus and a Zetec etc for it, he seemed very interested. (money will always be one of the main deciders though.
|
|
|
|
Dez
Club Retro Rides Member
And I won't sit down. And I won't shut up. And most of all I will not grow up.
Posts: 11,790
Club RR Member Number: 34
|
|
Jan 22, 2008 19:26:53 GMT
|
thats a really cool idea/car, but....
why use the motor thats plagued with electrical problems? and got ot all the effort of fitting the 3.2 instead of the 4L?
length of that top hose is very questionable too......
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2008 19:29:12 GMT
|
thats a really cool idea/car, but.... why use the motor thats plagued with electrical problems? and got ot all the effort of fitting the 3.2 instead of the 4L? length of that top hose is very questionable too...... might of had the 3.2 car, crashed damage perhaps, and thought, why not?? seems reasonable to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2008 19:47:53 GMT
|
ooooooooooh tasteehhhh
|
|
once again rocking with 1117cc and 4 gears!
|
|