Paul Y
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,948
|
|
May 24, 2021 21:07:34 GMT
|
Oh Boy have I spent a lot of time looking at pictures of rear shocks over the past day and, I am no further forward. So here is the dilemma. I have a NoLimits Panhard bar kit that requires the removal of the old mount and installation of the new with a number of bolts. You can sort of see what I mean here. The problem I am facing is that the bolts holding the mount on interfere with the shock. If I turn them around so the nuts are on the inside they then interfere with the Panhard bar. Originally the shocks mount inside the chassis, I have modified the lower mount to move them to the outside. Thought I had cracked it when somebody suggested mounting them vertically HUZZAH!!!!!! Better check on the other side. Oh...Sausages. So, my question is how would you mount these? How far can I incline the shock back until it becomes ineffective? Actually just had a thought, maybe turn the shock 'upside down' but not a huge fan of that as the shaft will be fully exposed to the debris being thrown up by the wheels. Always some sort of shock cover I suppose... Mmm... Anyway, over to you lot. Thanks! P.
|
|
Last Edit: May 24, 2021 21:08:30 GMT by Paul Y
|
|
|
mk2cossie
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 2,976
Club RR Member Number: 77
|
|
May 24, 2021 21:22:15 GMT
|
Don't fit them upside-down The internal valuing is different between bound and rebound (this i know from experience) As there is a lot of bolt on goodies there, what is the normal method of mounting the dampers? Ideally as upright as possible, but they can be angled with an effect on effective damping ability as they are angled
|
|
|
|
Paul Y
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,948
|
|
May 24, 2021 21:32:56 GMT
|
The shocks originally mount to the crossmember where the mallet and ruler currently reside in this picture. The bracket they attach too has been removed. The lower shock mount is turned 180 to get the shock behind the axle - does that help? Thanks for the tip on bound and rebound - seems logical when you think about it. P.
|
|
|
|
mk2cossie
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 2,976
Club RR Member Number: 77
|
|
May 24, 2021 21:58:00 GMT
|
I'd possibly be inclined to get a plate made up that bolts to the big plate just in front of the current top mount for the damper Would that space it out enough to clear the other bolt heads, and make the damper body almost vertical
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 24, 2021 22:01:05 GMT
|
Thanks for the tip on bound and rebound - seems logical when you think about it. no, it really doesn't! they still get compressed whichever way up they are.. however if they are designed to run that way up the oil valving will be in the bottom.
|
|
|
|
Dez
Club Retro Rides Member
And I won't sit down. And I won't shut up. And most of all I will not grow up.
Posts: 11,715
Club RR Member Number: 34
|
|
May 24, 2021 22:21:59 GMT
|
I’d put them back where they were originally, or as close to as possible. With that suspension setup they’re acting as roll damping as well as shock absorbers, mounting them how you have removes that function. They certainly need to be ‘across’ the axle and not fore/aft of it like a leaf spring setup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 24, 2021 22:22:18 GMT
|
Why not mount one sloping forwards and one backwards, as is done on Dodge RAMs, etc. This also provides some axle location under hard acceleration. Or, seeing as you have coils, fit some coil-over shocks...
|
|
|
|
Dez
Club Retro Rides Member
And I won't sit down. And I won't shut up. And most of all I will not grow up.
Posts: 11,715
Club RR Member Number: 34
|
|
May 24, 2021 22:38:02 GMT
|
Why not mount one sloping forwards and one backwards, as is done on Dodge RAMs, etc. This also provides some axle location under hard acceleration. Or, seeing as you have coils, fit some coil-over shocks... You need to consider the springs and axle location method when recommending such a setup. That setup is exclusively for twin parallel leaf setups as it uses the shocks to counteract spring wrap, also known as axle tramp. It’s really not suitable for an axle that pivots around a front centre origin like c10 trailing arms do. The shocks should be mounted as they were originally, like this, perpendicular to the axle The way they were mounted originally is the right way. Anything else isn’t right and they will bind badly. Paul, What’s the thinking behind the ‘new’ panhard bar? They already have a panhard as standard so why does it need a different one? Tbh it looks like poorly designed aftermarket parts that ‘fix’ one perceived problem, only to create another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dez wrote: "Tbh it looks like poorly designed aftermarket parts that ‘fix’ one perceived problem, only to create another." I was thinking along the same lines, but was too polite to say!
|
|
|
|
Paul Y
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,948
|
|
|
I did write a very long reply but then my laptop decided to update itself and that was the end of that! So - briefly. Suspension set up is a copy of the guy's truck who consitantly finishes in the top 3 in some Autocross series in the States. He did a series of articles outlining why he did each mod and the effect each one had on his lap times. Panhard rod. A Panhard rod changes its 'length' as it moves through the suspension arc therefore moving the axle left and right. As the truck is lowered it will lengthen the bar moving the axle to the passengers side. You could shorten the rod to take account of this, some bend them others cut and sleeve it. Second problem with the way it is mounted from the factory is that it is not parallel with the ground at ride height and is relatively short, both meaning that there is a large variation in side to side location. The aftermarket bar does two things. One, mounts it lower so making it easier to get it as close to parallel as possible at ride height and, two the extra length means that the arc is smaller also meaning it stays more central. Shocks. The big anti roll bar takes care of the lateral control so the shocks no longer have that function. Also means more room to route the exhausts to the back of the truck. On the earlier trucks the shocks were mounted outboard, I am trying to replicate that set up but was looking for another set of eyes on what would be the best solution to my clearance issue. I 'could' buy the kit that does all of the thinking for me but I am skint hence why I am open to try different methods of achieving the same result. Everything is a compromise, just like everyday is a school day if you are open to the thinking of others. Really appreciate all feedback, I work in an industry that is anything but polite so you will find it very difficult to offend me! P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The low chassis mount for the panhard rod also lowers the rear roll centre. I believe No Limits do a chassis mount kit for the external shocks. It looks like it spaces them further from the chassis rails. EDIT just spotted that you know of the NL kit Paul.
|
|
Last Edit: May 25, 2021 9:51:56 GMT by crockpot
Proton Jumbuck-deceased :-( 2005 Kia Sorento the parts hauling heap V8 Humber Hawk 1948 Standard12 pickup SOLD 1953 Pop build (wifey's BIVA build).
|
|
Paul Y
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,948
|
|
May 25, 2021 10:52:04 GMT
|
The low chassis mount for the panhard rod also lowers the rear roll centre. I believe No Limits do a chassis mount kit for the external shocks. It looks like it spaces them further from the chassis rails. EDIT just spotted that you know of the NL kit Paul. Good catch! I would like to say that was in my previous version but... Rob at NoLimit is the chap I am copying - his low buck JT build can be seen HEREP.
|
|
|
|
slater
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 6,390
Club RR Member Number: 78
|
|
May 25, 2021 11:44:05 GMT
|
Would seem a simple case of welding a new lower mount to the end of the radius arm and fabricating a new top mount to bolt to the chassis? The original fitment with them slopeing backwards looks awful for geometry. Loads of 'falling rate'. You could get them much more vertical and stop all that.
I get the new position if the panhard but the bracket looks a bit flimsy.
|
|
|
|
Paul Y
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,948
|
|
May 25, 2021 13:14:00 GMT
|
Probably doesn't show too well in the pictures but bracket is a big old unit, and mounted in double sheer. Think I am going to end up replicating the kit that is available - I already have the top brackets made from the first fitting, just looking to see how best to get the bottom constructed. I don't really like the way the kit mounts the bottom shock bolt (single sheer) so will have to see what I can do to get the clearance etc needed. For reference this is the kit available. P.
|
|
|
|
mk2cossie
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 2,976
Club RR Member Number: 77
|
|
May 25, 2021 13:51:44 GMT
|
We get loads of vehicles through work that have dampers mounted in single shear
|
|
|
|