|
|
|
I purchased a car about 18 months ago that has been through a few bodgers hands, and subsequently there are a few non-standard things on it. The reason I mention that is to eliminate this kind of answer to my question... "Just look up what should be on the car and get one of those".... because I'm not looking for that kind of answer today My car has a few engine improvements, including an electronic ignition unit. It came to me with a Flamethrower2 0.6ohms ignition coil. The coil already looked very very old. It seems to have been holding up fine ever since, however I suspect it must be nearing the end of its life soon so I want to be ready to replace it. 0.6ohms coils seem to be about £40-£70. A more common 0.3ohms coil however can be had for about £17. My knowledge of electrics and how it all works is so poor that I can't figure out for sure what effect it might have on my engine's running if I was to use a lower ohms rated coil. Soooo, my question is: =============== What is the likely result of going for economy and buying a lower ohms rated coil? What effect will it have on the running, reliability and performance of my engine? =============== It's impossible, with my total lack of comprehension of electrics, to determine whether my car actually needs a more expensive coil, or was merely fitted with one because there was a spare one hanging around during a past bodge. Flamethrower2 seems to be the ONLY 0.6ohms coil I can find, and it seems to be fitted to a lot of VW Campers and is therefore subjected to the usual VeeDub scene tax. If it gets fitted to the mealy VW aircooled fizzbanger, I can't help wondering whether there is actually any value in me fitting it to my Essex V6 or whether ohms ratings don't really affect the engine performance. And my second question is... does anyone happen to know if there is an 0.6ohms coil on the market that doesn't cost as much as the Flamethrower2?
|
|
Last Edit: Oct 9, 2017 7:37:14 GMT by Deleted
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,885
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
|
|
You need to provide detail on the complete ignition system as it is a system and one components cannot be fully assessed for suitability or impact on the rest of the system if changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... I thought you might say that. Not *YOU* exactly, but... "the wise voice of the internet"
Too many unknowns for me, which is why I wanted to ask in a general, hypothetcial sense, for my edification, what the likely effect would be.
FYI...
1. Car came with an electronic ignition module but I can't identify it. It doesn't seem to be an exact match for all the usual suspects. It has no identifying markings.
2. Car may or may not have a "Eureka Bypass Wire". This is apparently a thing on SOME Scimitars, but not all Scimitars, despite being VERY IMPORTANT. All attempts to work out what a Eureka wire might look like and where it might go have proved at best to be fruitless and at the very worst to be utterly bamboozling. Various people who feel they really know what it is have said totally contradictory things about what it is and where it is. Sometimes it isn't even a wire, and it it doesn't bypass anything it bypasses the bypass, or something. At one point it was confidently stated that it was attached to the starter motor... until I photographed it and asked "IS THIS IT?", at which point it wasn't, and then nobody knew what the wire I'd photographed was but felt strongly it might indicate that it might be important and could be a clue to something that I hadn't even asked about. Then shortly after that, it was a wire buried deep inside my loom and could only be present if it couldn't be seen at all, and if it could be seen... I may not have a Eureka wire, and this may or may not be a good thing, in a bad sense. Then it was something best detected by sniffing the glove box. If it smelled of socks, I had to cut my loom in half and look for the blue wire, which would mean I hadn't found the Eureka Wire but I should keep looking. Then I was told to attach some wires to some wires, and run another wire from the battery to the cigarette lighter whilst revving the engine to 6000rpm. if the reading was NOT less than what would be more than what it is when the engine is NOT idling and the radio was turned down on a Thursday in July, it might be that it is NOT what is a Eureka wire that isn't, and therefore is, and therefore, something something head asplode.
3 (Subsequently) the coil fitted may be a ballast resisted coil or it might not be. There are no indications on what's left of the label, and unlike most other coils the Flamerthrower 2 coil is never ever described anywhere as a ballasted or non-ballasted coil. It's just "a coil", a super powerful coil that laughs at ballast and kicks it out of the vehicle. Everyone else's coils say "Ballast resistor required" or "Not for use with a ballast resistor". My knowledge of electrics, coupled with the bone-meltingly confusing and contradictory information I've had about the Eureka wire, have left me feeling ever-so slightly less than utterly clueless about what the hell to do. The safe option is: Just buy another Flamethrower 2 (£45), but part of me thinks "What if that was just a spare coil kicking about when one was needed (it looks ridiculously old and rusty) and it just happened to work quite by chance, but I would actually be better off with a different resistance rate and a coil with less fancy graphics on it (£17).
I think I'll just get another fancy-pants "Awesome Dazzle Effect Flamethrower Megatron 5000 Lightning Godwrath Megacoil" and stop thinking about it.
|
|
Last Edit: Oct 9, 2017 23:16:08 GMT by Deleted
|
|
|
|
|
Let me just re-ask the general hypotehticalquestion here...
In a general sense, if one was dealing with a purely hypothetical car that doesn't even exist, and it had electronic points on it, and it was fitted with a 0.6ohms coil, and ballast wasn't an issue one way or the other... what would the effect on the vehicle be if a tight-wad owner decided to fit a more humble .3ohms coil?
Just hypothetically. Ignoring all the details of what a real person with a real car might need to provide...
|
|
|
|
scimjim
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 1,503
Club RR Member Number: 8
|
|
|
You do tend to find lots of contradictory b@ll@x information on Facebook It's a eureka wire, not a eureka bypass. It drops the voltage to the coil during normal running to about 9v. It's bypassed during starting because the starter pulls a lot of current, so the coil sees about 9v on a ballast or non-ballast system. Theory is that a coil designed to run on 9v will provide a stronger spark during starting than a coil designed for 12v. On a 5/5a the standard eureka wire is in the loom between rev counter and coil. All 5/5a have them from new. SE6 on have a remote wing mounted ballast resistor. Ballast coil is 1.5 ohm primary resistance (such as Lucas DLB102 or 110), non-ballast is 3 ohm (such as Lucas DLB101 or 105). With electronic ignition and no ballast you could run a 1 ohm DLB198. The Pertronix flamethrower are meant to be very good - they use a lower primary resistance for a higher voltage output - that's only really a benefit at high rpm where the coil has to fire every few milliseconds. The same theory holds though, if you run a ballast coil on a non-ballast system it will overheat the coil and quickly burn it out. If you run a non-ballast coil on a ballast system, it won't see full voltage (poor spark). So you must find out if your eureka wire has been bypassed or not before changing the coil.
|
|
Last Edit: Oct 10, 2017 7:20:13 GMT by scimjim
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,885
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
|
|
Simply then - half the resistance and it doubles the current - not usually a good thing.
|
|
|
|
scimjim
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 1,503
Club RR Member Number: 8
|
|
|
Here's something off the web that's written quite well - I've made one sentence bold and removed some references to motorbikes.
An ignition coil is actually made up of two coils. Just like a model train transformer, an ignition coil has a primary winding (or coil) and a secondary winding (or coil). The primary winding is the half of the ignition coil that connects to the battery, the secondary winding is the half that connects to the spark plug. In between, the aforementioend amplification takes place to convert the battery's low voltage to the high voltage needed by the spark plug. The actual conversion process is called "mutual induction.". It's rather technical and not all that useful to our discussion.
What is a "High Performance" Ignition Coil?
Ignition coils being production items, no manufacturer puts one on their vehicle that is more powerful than necessary, so typically they are constructed with a ratio of primary to secondary windings of, say, 50:1 (example only). That is, the primary's thick wire is coiled onto itself, say, 150 turns while the secondary's thinner wire has 50 times as many turns (7500, in this example), resulting in an increase in voltage, just as in a transformer. The two windings are wrapped one around the other, concentrically, with the primary winding being on the outside, usually. (Why "usually" is not important, but some ignition coils are built the other way, with the primary winding in the middle instead of on the outside.) The center of the ignition coil, around which the two windings are wrapped, is a steel core. This core gives the magnetic field that appears inside the ignition coil a concentration point, which strengthens the field, improving ignition coil performance.
The traditional high performance ignition coil is one that has a different windings turn ratio than stock. So instead of the 50:1 mentioned above, the ratio might be 70:1. That is, the secondary winding has many more turns than the stock ignition coil, resulting in a higher voltage output. This costs money of course, so some makers of high performance ignition coils take a different tack, and get that 70:1 ratio by reducing the primary turns instead of increasing the secondary turns. This is legitimate, and the result is exactly the same, except less money is spent, the coil doesn't end up being larger, no larger shipping boxes are needed, etc. But as with everything, there is no free lunch. The primary winding is connected to the battery, remember, and being smaller than stock means less resistance than stock, which means more electrical current, more loading of the ignition parts connected on the battery side -- most notably the points -- and of course, more heat and wear. Metallic contact points can withstand this added strain, though with accelerated wear, but the electronic boxes that replaced the points on later machines' electronic ignitions cannot, quickly overheating and failing. This is the main reason the sellers of high performance ignition coils offer two main choices, low-ohm and high-ohm models. The low ohm is suitable for points ignitions, the higher for electronic ignitions.
How Does a High Performance Ignition Coil Help Performance? A high performance ignition coil helps engine performance four important ways. First, the higher voltage allows for a larger spark plug gap, which results in a more robust initial flame kernal at the start of combustion. The result is a real-world engine torque increase. Second, having more voltage on tap means the voltage required to bridge the spark plug gap gets there faster, leaving less time for voltage diversion through the spark plug's inevitable carbon deposits. Third, the higher voltage potential creates a stronger "push" on the electrical stream to the plug, resulting in increased electrical current, i.e. more energy, more snap. Fourth, with more voltage available, there is more in reserve for non-standard situations such going uphill on poor fuel on a hot day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 10, 2017 12:11:21 GMT
|
Cheers for all this. In the absence of any ability to open up my engine bay to somebody who knows exactly what they're looking at in the case of Scimitars first and my particular Scimitar secondly, I think it's really just a case of sticking to what's there. Saving £X's on a cheaper coil only to find it isn't up to the job negates the cost saving and actually makes it more expensive if I then have to revert to the higher priced unit.
So I'll save up my pocket money and get a replacement Flamethrower 2 in stock for when this one finally conks out. It has worked on my car for X years already, so it must be the best option for replacements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 10, 2017 14:25:28 GMT
|
Well, I finally managed to work out what my e-points are. It's an Accuspark module. I have to assume it's the right one for the Essex as it works (Accuspark kit17) Nice that someone seemingly had a go at painting it white. Always important to try out new things.
|
|
Last Edit: Oct 10, 2017 14:30:24 GMT by Deleted
|
|
|
|
Oct 12, 2017 16:14:17 GMT
|
After digging around a bit I found there was a car parts supplier close to home that I hadn't seen before, and they were listing the Flamethrower2 as being in stock.
I decided to drop in and have a look at the packaging/info to see if that alluded to there being a ballast or non-ballast option. There was nothing on the packaging and no additional literature. It had the same product code as mine though, and he was asking the lowest price I'd seen these coils going for, so despite my current need for economising I splurged and took it home.
Fitted it this afternoon, plus a new set of plugs I had previously put into my spares dept, and I took the car for a spin.
Man, this car really goes very very well indeed when it's on top form. It's awesome to drive. A beast. I don't think the coil has necessarily made much difference. My understanding is Coils are either working 100% or they've stopped, there's no in-between state of failing gracefully. My old one was still working so its now my "get me home" glove box back-up.
But .... a fresh set of plugs really makes a difference I believe.
There is obviously a potential negative to this. My car seems to foul one plug leading to lumpier running after 6 months. Clearly that's not great. Having said that though the plug that I have previously suspected of being fouled didn't look fouled at all. None of them did. But it definitely has a lot more going for it with fresh plugs in, so I'm happy for today and I'll just have to see how long it takes before I begin to feel it's not quite firing consistently on all 6 cylinders again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you think the coil is on its way out, I've got a 70 year old coil that still works?
|
|
|
|
ChasR
RR Helper
motivation
Posts: 10,309
Club RR Member Number: 170
|
|
Oct 13, 2017 10:25:05 GMT
|
it sounds like your spark plugs were at But .... a fresh set of plugs really makes a difference I believe. . It sound like you possibly had a similar problem to myself. On my Stag I fitted a set of spark plugs from an unknown supplier. They were NGKs and were £7 for 8 of them. It always had a slight flutter at idle and seemed to suffer from misfiring &ignition breakup above 3.5krpm. I thought it was the coil too which made things worse! After all I went from a Bosch Red to a cheapo County coil. As soon as I changed the plugs to motor factor sourced NGKs, albeit at a higher price the misfire went away for good and never came back. Even though it was exempt from the emissions it was actually able to pass the emissions if it had been a post 1975 car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 13, 2017 13:58:40 GMT
|
£7 for 8 NGK's is suspiciously cheap. I decided to order a spare set from Burton or Demon at the start of the year because nobody seemed to have them in stock locally. I think 6 cost me about £35.
I find NGK's to be generally very good, but I also know that my car has seemed to possibly eat them quite quickly so far in my ownership. The ones the car came with were old and actually snapped off at the ends, which quickly explained and resolved the misfire it developed on the first journey home.
New set and the misfire went away, never to return. having changed the plugs for myself, I can see how the tips can easily get snapped off if you aren't very patient. It's a B**ger of a car to get a couple of the plugs in and out. It would be easy in a moment of haste to try and wrench your wrench out and to pull at the lead tip whilst doing so.
About 6 months later though I suspected it might be running a little bit clumpy... not a misfire as such, just not as good somehow. So I decided to pull all the plugs to see how they had fared. Overall they were looking okay, but I had an old, partly destroyed carburetor and it was clearly over fuelling. What was left of it was patched together with tape and cable ties so I didn't attempt to adjust it. Swapped the plugs anyway, then later on fitted a new carb.
At that point when I changed out my plugs, the rearmost driver's side plug looked wet, so I feared a greater problem.
Next time it started to feel a bit crabby, I decided to only swap that plug over. By now I had the new carb on so things were better all round. It looked a bit wet again but not so much. In hindsight I suspect I may have dripped oil when pulling the dipstick at first.
So I've just swapped them again purely because... new coil... so new plugs, but it probably didn't need them swapping again so soon. They looked okay.
This time the wet plug was not wet at all. It was dry. The plugs looked good, but whether it was the coil swap or the plug swap, or both... my car is now like a hungry attack dog straining at the leash.
= )
|
|
Last Edit: Oct 13, 2017 13:59:17 GMT by Deleted
|
|
|
|
Oct 13, 2017 15:04:18 GMT
|
£35 is too mych for plugs, 10-15 is ballpark
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 13, 2017 16:32:57 GMT
|
Just checked... £12.18 from BurtonPower.
I must be thinking of something else.
First set I bought was from Halfords (Don't knock it, it was close by and I needed them)
Halfords price.... £FOUR QUID EACH!!!! HOLY MAZUMA!
|
|
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,885
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
|
Oct 13, 2017 18:19:14 GMT
|
I would also be looking at what is creating that mark beneath the connector on that rotor arm - Looks like spark scatter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 13, 2017 18:23:38 GMT
|
It's generally a bit battered to be fair. I'm going to order a new one now I've figured out what it is.
|
|
|
|