|
|
Celica OwnersDeleted
@Deleted
|
Nov 27, 2013 19:27:41 GMT
|
|
looking at celica well a K reg 1994 import
googled all the info but any forum members running one now or in the past
this one is 2.0 litre auto
all googled info looks promising with mpg average but you cant beat a real owner appraisal good or bad
if in wrong section i apologise now
|
| |
|
|
mk2cossie
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 3,063 
Club RR Member Number: 77
|
Celica Ownersmk2cossie
@mk2cossie
Club Retro Rides Member 77
|
Nov 27, 2013 20:03:28 GMT
|
my other half got a st182 manual a year and a half ago now. Been in daily use and replaced a mk3 1.4 Golf, and the fuel use is only about a fiver more for the 250-300miles per week she does in it  They are getting a bit of tin worm in awkward places, and some parts are expensive to get hold of. But otherwise a bloody reliable car and cheap to run as well! And goes pretty well for a nearly 20yo car. Cant vouch for the autos though :/ |
| |
|
|
|
|
Celica OwnersDeleted
@Deleted
|
Nov 27, 2013 20:29:42 GMT
|
|
thanks for info
one I'm looking at is from an old chap who cant get in it anymore
looks ok but i have no knowledge of them
as you say nearly twenty years old
what makes us tick on here
the unknown rust and some faith
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had a last of the line L reg. awesome car totally bullet proof in every respect
|
| |
|
|
Bioshock
Posted a lot
It aint hip to be square.
Posts: 1,861
|
|
|
|
|
A mate, Al, has a k reg convertable which is a 2.0 auto.only thing its needed is a bit of TLC on the bodywork. I've been close to getting one a couple of times.
|
| |
Almera GTI = ugly bird who turns out to be great in the sack = Win
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've got an ST185 GT4, it's pretty good. The fuel consumption on that is excellent, only 10 litres/100km (28mpg UK), which is as good as my 1.3 litre Suzuki Sierra! Despite the lack of a turbo and 4wd, I wouldn't expect the auto to be any better than that, if anything it's probably a bit worse.
|
| |
|
|
