|
3 point harnessDeleted
@Deleted
|
Dec 28, 2006 22:27:48 GMT
|
Hi just a quick and stupid question Am I right in thinking that if I already have 3 point retractable seat belt fixings in the Viva I can just replace them with three point harness's?
It's just that the current seat belts don't retract very well and if that may be an MOT fail I may as well get some harness's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 22:32:20 GMT
|
no, thats not the way they sit... for harnesses you really need no rear seats, and you'll have 2 straps over your shoulders
|
|
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 22:47:15 GMT
|
99% of harnesses should be an MOT failure due to their lack of an intertia reel system (ie they don't retract). Schroth used to make one that had a clip on system so it could be used like a normal seat belt and this was available through Safety Devices, basically you're looking for an E mark. To mount them safely, you can use the two mounts either side of your seat as you sit in them, but the rear must extend from the back of the seat horizontally and go up or down no more than ten degrees before it reaches the bolt. So the rear shelf or a harness bar on a roll cage are the proper places, not the rear seat belt mount point on the C pillar, and definitely not the points under the rear seat base. If you don't keep the rear belt/s horizontal, when you crash you'll submarine. If you picture a triangle, with the top being the point at which the harness passes over your seat and the two lower corners being your mounting points, the top point merely moves forward and down. Sorry to be so long winded, hope that makes sense...
|
|
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 22:49:01 GMT
|
www.versionr.com/harness/index.shtmlmight shed some light on the matter. i was also told by a member of law enforcement that it was actually illegal to have my rear seats in place with harnesses as carrying a rear passenger (in a 3dr car) could mean that in an accident they would get tangled in the harnesses and had no route of escape!
|
|
|
|
Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,540
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 22:51:16 GMT
|
99% of harnesses should be an MOT failure due to their lack of an intertia reel system (ie they don't retract). ) eh? Why should inertia reels be required for an MOT? Statics work just as well of not better when adjusted properly and is all that were fitted early on? Back to topic - what the others said! If I'd got myself in gear today I might have fitted one to the Herald and I'd have photos to help explain
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 22:56:08 GMT
|
It's all to do with when they brought in the intertia reel seltbelt on production cars, just like black and grey plates etc. The law... Pah. Harnesses mounted badly can be far worse though, I've heard some right shockers...
|
|
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 22:57:42 GMT
|
the rear must extend from the back of the seat horizontally and go up or down no more than ten degrees before it reaches the bolt. So the rear shelf or a harness bar on a roll cage are the proper places, not the rear seat belt mount point on the C pillar, and definitely not the points under the rear seat base MSA blue book says anything within 45deg of the hole in the seat is "acceptable" i remember having a problem because my cheap £30 a piece jobs were E marked but my £170 each FIA ones werent although, never had anything said MOT time
|
|
|
|
|
3 point harnessbriandamaged
@GUEST
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:00:51 GMT
|
www.versionr.com/harness/index.shtmlmight shed some light on the matter. I was also told by a member of law enforcement that it was actually illegal to have my rear seats in place with harnesses as carrying a rear passenger (in a 3dr car) could mean that in an accident they would get tangled in the harnesses and had no route of escape! ....which is crazy, seeing as the MSA insist on all road rally cars having a complete interior, rear seat and all....even if she's caged.
|
|
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:00:58 GMT
|
Here's the harness in my BMW, you can just see where I've mounted the two shoulder straps on the rear shelf. The main point is to remember that if the seat breaks in an impact, the harness will hold you in place, not moved about with you... That doesn't really make sense. Sorry, it's also not ideal to have them in a car without a rollcage (like here... Ahem). If you roll over and the roof comes down, you'll be pinned upright with no chance to scooch down... And it goes on.
|
|
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:02:45 GMT
|
www.versionr.com/harness/index.shtmlmight shed some light on the matter. I was also told by a member of law enforcement that it was actually illegal to have my rear seats in place with harnesses as carrying a rear passenger (in a 3dr car) could mean that in an accident they would get tangled in the harnesses and had no route of escape! ....which is crazy, seeing as the MSA insist on all road rally cars having a complete interior, rear seat and all....even if she's caged. Sooo, the Police aren't actually sure what's the definition of the law then? Never heard that one before...
|
|
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:03:09 GMT
|
Those LOOK fantastic though ;D I always liked one of my friends cars, it has 5 point harnesses (I think?) as well as standard inertial reels for day-to-day driving, it's only a two seater mind
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:07:13 GMT
|
well heres mine
|
|
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:11:08 GMT
|
Whay thank ya, I left the intertia reel belts in too, just in case I got somebody who knew the law for my age of car.
Mr Pinch, I know what you mean about MOT, I've never had a problem either. Did you hear that the MSA are now supposed to recognise the American SFI standards? My pair of five point, 3in harnesses like in the picture cost £108 landed in this country, not much more for aircraft release either. Fully SFI approved for three years as I recall.
|
|
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,540
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:11:49 GMT
|
I think a steeper angle like gofasterpinch's Polo is OK if proper bucket seats with holes are fitted and the holes for the harnesses are above your shoulder. That way the seat takes the verticle load. Bryn, did you get a job lot of those Crow harnesses?
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:16:32 GMT
|
i only had my inertia reels in then to run in "standard production" class. Didnt know the MSA would recognise american standards, should make it easier to maintain national B spec on a car now (belts must be in FIA date), mine are in date for another 4 years so i should be ok for a while
|
|
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:18:06 GMT
|
That's kind of what I was trying to explain earlier, and trust me I only know this because a couple of people who really know what they're talking about explained it to me. Not because I fancy myself as some sort of self righteous tech guru... As it was explained to me, in your case if the seat breaks loose, there is excess length in the harness that will allow you to move about. But if that happens, you're pretty kerfurtled anyway. I'm sure somebody else could explain this clearer than me? Sorry...
|
|
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:28:42 GMT
|
Seth, wherever I go... So do they. Clip in styleee ;D That's what I was trying to say, if the 'vertical load' snaps the seat, you've got problems a harness probably ain't going to fix. I was shown a load of testing videos a couple of years ago on different types of harness set-up and mounting. Some badly mounted harnesses put such adverse stress on the body, limbs were torn off... Nice.
|
|
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:36:32 GMT
|
in my experience its better to pay the extra for the aircraft buckle type rather than ones which mount to the lapp straps like in a crash with the bottom ones, your more likely to split your sternum, and believe me thats not a nice experience
|
|
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:40:30 GMT
|
I'm a firm believer in having a crotch strap now too, I just worry about slipping out from underneath it in an impact. In fact with the amount of curse word I've been shown about crash research over the years, it's a miracle I ever feel confident enough to get in a car... I reckon my old man had it sorted with his vintage stuff, throw yourself under the dash* or throw yourself out... The latter it is then.
*slice of engine turned alloy
|
|
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
Dec 28, 2006 23:42:04 GMT
|
Sorry Mr Pinch, missed your point there about aircraft versus clunk click style. What's all that about then? Or were you referring to the number of straps?
|
|
Last Edit: Dec 28, 2006 23:42:20 GMT by bryn
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
|