jayps
Part of things
fixing old fords so they can rust again
Posts: 282
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 17:09:30 GMT
|
Pondering of weather theres a gap in the market for another mag in the vain of street machine or possibly an online version ? Written by us and featuring our cars ,theres enough history and knowledge on here to do something ,what do you guys think ? Ive posted on a few forums over to you ,if theres enough interest then may try putting something together ! Now where Colin Burnham !!!
|
|
www.wokingbodyshop.co.ukFord Pop "Orange a peel " Desperado Model T Ford Cortina GT "Street Dream " Ford Granada 2.8i "press car" Ford Fiesta 1.4 Ghia 2008 Honda FRV Ford Focus Titanium 2.0tdci "EX FORD" Fiesta 1.3 Style Ford Mondeo 2.0 GLX 1998 "low mileage minter"
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 17:22:52 GMT
|
|
|
1939 Francis Barnett Powerbike 1971 Honda C90 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5 GLX 1993 Fiat Panda Selecta 2003 Vauxhall Combo 1.7DI van
|
|
Dez
Club Retro Rides Member
And I won't sit down. And I won't shut up. And most of all I will not grow up.
Posts: 11,790
Club RR Member Number: 34
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 17:26:34 GMT
|
no.
a dwindling marketplace thats already saturated, and a lot of whats out there is fairly medicore as it has to pander to all tastes, and is quite dumbed down. thats why so many of them come and go, and don't make it. I'm surprised so many do keep going with the rubbish they print tbh. i even think online 'magazines' are a bit passe to be honest, the whole point of the internet is people want something dynamic they can interact with and have discussion, as well as just being shown things and told stuff. that thing they want is a forum. if what you find is too simpleton for your knowledge, its easy to drag and drop/copy and paste, and find some futher reading on a subject. a magazine cant do that. i may still buy the odd magazine now and then, but i can read it cover to cover in a couple of hours, yet i can spend days on here looking at build threads and reading stuff in the general board, and still never see it all.
or conversely, if i want something in print, i can go and buy a few old technical manuals, engineering books, or old motor racing history books, and get a far better read than a much abbreviated magazine article can give me, and usually for less as well.
|
|
|
|
sumpcracker
Posted a lot
Yes, I’m still here.
Posts: 1,751
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 17:34:02 GMT
|
Retro cars is getting worse imo, aiming for young audience and just copying the scene work of other mags. No real tech knowledge, just a load of nice picures of the cars the staff are into, VW,J as that was their background.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 17:53:34 GMT
|
Anybody get 'Classics' magazine? reminds me of how Practical Classics used to be
|
|
1939 Francis Barnett Powerbike 1971 Honda C90 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5 GLX 1993 Fiat Panda Selecta 2003 Vauxhall Combo 1.7DI van
|
|
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 18:07:05 GMT
|
I think you are being a mite bit unfair to RC here.. The features do lack technical detail, however you have PPC for that if that is what you are after. Frankly though if I want technical detail I'll buy a book about the thing I want technical detail on, want to learn about turbos? Buy a book on turbos etc. etc. ... or ask on here or somewhere else like here that isn't here. What RC supply is some interesting and diverse feature cars, the one on my coffee table at the moment has Ford, Vauxhaul, Renault, BMW, Opel, Mazda and Porsche feature cars. They are trapped between people like us that want more obscure, more detail, more modified, a publisher that wants more stock, more classic, easier to sell ad space and a section of the public that want something in between. If they get people interested in modified old cars and provide an outlet for the stuff we see around the internet and beyond (remember folks WWW isn't the be all and end all of car modifying), then I'm all for them. For the more greasy fingered types you have the pseudo-top-gear-lite that is PPC. Or you could buy a good book instead. Web magazines don't really work (as we've discovered) but blogs do, however they are a bite sized chunk (like a lot of forum threads), perhaps magazines do need to take a deeper look, but paper costs, advertisers, publisher and the publishing cycle all serve to make that not an easy thing to turn into reality. I've entertained two ideas in the publishing space, a) free magazine, super light, 30-40 or even 50 pages, half of which would be advertising (which pays for cost of production etc.), quarterly, covers shows, a couple of "feature" cars, some paid for features, maybe some sponsored tech advice etc. Distribute it through the people that advertise in the magazines and through a website (with a nominal charge for the mag + postage). Ran the numbers, not sure it is sustainable at a quality that would make it a living for even one person to do full time. or! b) Rodders Journal style, £10 or more an issue, super glossy, quarterly (or less, bi-annually). Properly thick, 200 pages, long form articles, quality photos, very very few adverts (if any). A kind of luxury retro magazine, limited print run. I also ran the numbers on this, it is feasible if you can get production costs right, but paper keeps going up in price and I suspect people would less inclined to spend that much on a "magazine" when it came to actually spending it (I'm sure a lot of people would like to have the magazine but money/mouth interface would be a different matter). To do the product justice you'd want the best photographers, maybe even going outside the usual classic car photographers and into an even more expensive area. Maybe one day I'll have a spare 5 minutes and I'll action one of these ideas ...
|
|
|
|
craig1010cc
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 2,998
Club RR Member Number: 35
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 18:22:27 GMT
|
I do like the idea of option B, but I think your right that getting people to shell out £10 will be a struggle.
I would love to see another street machine, something to sit along side customcars, but I don't think there is the market for both (proven as one went out of circulation, but perhaps a 1/4ly version?)
Online ones, i like the idea and love:mini is a really nice example, but i can't get into it, I like to thumb through a mag whilst sat on the sofa with a brew, not sit reading it on a screen
|
|
|
|
sumpcracker
Posted a lot
Yes, I’m still here.
Posts: 1,751
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 18:34:09 GMT
|
Hotwire - i take your point. I'm being a little harsh if you take all of their audience into account, & the pics are fantastic. I just feel there are a lot of people out there who can do better words for them, somthing between beginer (rc) and expert (ppc).
I don't see any need for any extra web coverage at all, the readers rides section here does the job well enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 20:10:24 GMT
|
No, Retro Cars Mag is like a revised version of Hot Car or something.
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 20:13:34 GMT
|
Rodders Journal style, £10 or more an issue, super glossy, quarterly (or less, bi-annually). Properly thick, 200 pages, long form articles, quality photos, very very few adverts (if any). A kind of luxury retro magazine, limited print run. its been done and the guy lost a bundle on it. People complained it was too expensive for a magazine and too floppy for a book. You can't please people. Especially people who build modified cars, thems the worst. I've replied to the OP on Rods & Sods pretty much in same vein as Dez. My complaint about RC mag is that the couple I picked up were all "Oh, what kind of old car can I buy to be cool?" and "crikey, cars that aren't VWs can be cool too!" That and the "authenticity" of authorship is questionable when most of the staff pay other people to do simple jobs on their cars for them. It may have changed since but I felt so robbed of my four quid on the couple I did buy I've not been back. I've stopped buying any magazines now. I found I wasn't reading them.
|
|
Last Edit: Jun 20, 2011 20:16:37 GMT by akku
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
sumpcracker
Posted a lot
Yes, I’m still here.
Posts: 1,751
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 20:22:04 GMT
|
My complaint about RC mag is that the couple I picked up were all "Oh, what kind of old car can I buy to be cool?" and "crikey, cars that aren't VWs can be cool too!" That and the "authenticity" of authorship is questionable when most of the staff pay other people to do simple jobs on their cars for them. This. But I'm sure pulling in the beginers and "cool" will sell more mags than aiming for oily fingerd types who already know everything, and in most cases have seen the cars on here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 20:29:50 GMT
|
I Joined this forum not that long ago and I have to say I was a regular buyer of rc but i havent even picked up the mag since joining I find theres more interesting topics and pics and subjects on this forum that a monthly mag wouldnt even scratch the surface of and i don't have to pay nearly a fiver to read it the only thing I might buy now is classic car weekly once in the blue moon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 20:30:04 GMT
|
TBH, No. Shame, but No. I am a bit of a Magazine fan, and have subscriptions to Retro Cars as well as Evo and Octane. It feels a bit greedy. The thing is, this place is more interesting, knowledgeable, diverse and inspiring than any mag. RR has filled any gap for me.
|
|
|
|
sumpcracker
Posted a lot
Yes, I’m still here.
Posts: 1,751
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 20:38:22 GMT
|
Looking at the last 3 comments, they would sell twice as many RC mags if RR wasnt here.
I don't think there is much room for any more mags or fourms unless its somthing realy special.
|
|
|
|
Dez
Club Retro Rides Member
And I won't sit down. And I won't shut up. And most of all I will not grow up.
Posts: 11,790
Club RR Member Number: 34
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 21:05:50 GMT
|
Rodders Journal style, £10 or more an issue, super glossy, quarterly (or less, bi-annually). Properly thick, 200 pages, long form articles, quality photos, very very few adverts (if any). A kind of luxury retro magazine, limited print run. its been done and the guy lost a bundle on it. People complained it was too expensive for a magazine and too floppy for a book. You can't please people. Especially people who build modified cars, thems the worst. I've replied to the OP on Rods & Sods pretty much in same vein as Dez. My complaint about RC mag is that the couple I picked up were all "Oh, what kind of old car can I buy to be cool?" and "crikey, cars that aren't VWs can be cool too!" That and the "authenticity" of authorship is questionable when most of the staff pay other people to do simple jobs on their cars for them. It may have changed since but I felt so robbed of my four quid on the couple I did buy I've not been back. I've stopped buying any magazines now. I found I wasn't reading them. youve pretty much expanded on my thinking there too. i find it style over substance, the opinions of people who arent really worth listening to. i also find it hard to read anything written by people with pretty much no mechanical experience. i suppose that sounds a little harsh, as if everyone did DIY id be out of a job, but in this country people who write for magazines seem to have this elivated staus of being able to express their opinions to others about the cars being built and people actually listening to them whether they're worth listening to or not. the VW scene is probably worst for this- its all about whos cool and who isnt, rather than whos actually capable of screwing together something competently and safely. i think they at least need to have a degree of mechanical skill themselves to make what they're saying credible. tbh though, its not RC that annoys me most. its obvious for a while theyve been more concerned about getting the magazine styled exactly like PVW that actually filling it with good content, and if good pictures are what you buy a magazine for(and lets face it, thats what sells them at a glance in whsmith) then they're onto a winner. its PPC that gets me- i don't understand how anyone can read half of it- they may as well just call it 'grumpy old mens car related winging mag' or something- all it is is a couple of 'names' moaning and winging about how everyone else is wrong and they're so great, or bigging each other up. if i wanted to be talked down to like they do id buy a broadsheet or something.
|
|
|
|
sumpcracker
Posted a lot
Yes, I’m still here.
Posts: 1,751
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 21:10:43 GMT
|
Haha, id buy a mag if you and alistairk wrote it, you have it all in a nutshell!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 21:27:38 GMT
|
Mr Cracker, are you aware of my rather irregular blog? It's lighter on slotmags than you may imagine.
Dez, can I have my mind back when you are done with it.
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
sonus
Europe
Posts: 1,392
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 21:43:29 GMT
|
its been done and the guy lost a bundle on it. People complained it was too expensive for a magazine and too floppy for a book. You can't please people. Especially people who build modified cars, thems the worst. I've replied to the OP on Rods & Sods pretty much in same vein as Dez. My complaint about RC mag is that the couple I picked up were all "Oh, what kind of old car can I buy to be cool?" and "crikey, cars that aren't VWs can be cool too!" That and the "authenticity" of authorship is questionable when most of the staff pay other people to do simple jobs on their cars for them. It may have changed since but I felt so robbed of my four quid on the couple I did buy I've not been back. I've stopped buying any magazines now. I found I wasn't reading them. youve pretty much expanded on my thinking there too. I find it style over substance, the opinions of people who arent really worth listening to. I also find it hard to read anything written by people with pretty much no mechanical experience. I suppose that sounds a little harsh, as if everyone did DIY id be out of a job, but in this country people who write for magazines seem to have this elivated staus of being able to express their opinions to others about the cars being built and people actually listening to them whether they're worth listening to or not. the VW scene is probably worst for this- its all about whos cool and who isnt, rather than whos actually capable of screwing together something competently and safely. I think they at least need to have a degree of mechanical skill themselves to make what they're saying credible. tbh though, its not RC that annoys me most. its obvious for a while theyve been more concerned about getting the magazine styled exactly like PVW that actually filling it with good content, and if good pictures are what you buy a magazine for(and lets face it, thats what sells them at a glance in whsmith) then they're onto a winner. its PPC that gets me- I don't understand how anyone can read half of it- they may as well just call it 'grumpy old mens car related winging mag' or something- all it is is a couple of 'names' moaning and winging about how everyone else is wrong and they're so great, or bigging each other up. if I wanted to be talked down to like they do id buy a broadsheet or something. I've been subscribing to both RC and PPC. I stopped my RC subscription when they first closed down and never bother renewing when they came back. PPC'S was good in the start, but I agree that it has gone down hill lately. They have had project cars that never gets finished (2xEscort), technical detail seems to be less and less important etc. But it still the best mag around imo. I wish I could have a mag that was heavy on details and how too's and that took me more than an evening to get through.
|
|
Current 1968 TVR VIXEN S1 V8 Prototype 2004 TVR T350C 2017 BMW 340i
Previous BMW 325d E91LCI - sold Alfa Romeo GTV - sold Citroen AX GT - at the breakers Ford Puma 1.7 - sold Volvo V50 2.0d - sold MGB GT - wrecked by fire MG ZT 1.8T - sold VW E-golf Electric - sold Mini Countryman 1.6D -sold Land Rover Discovery TD5 - sold
|
|
kevfromwales
Posted a lot
the conrod's REALLY out the block now!
Posts: 3,909
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 22:14:36 GMT
|
just spend your magazine dollah buying old issues of CC/SM, hotcar, CCC from back in the day!
I don't buy any mags any more - couple of mags a month is a car a year in kev budget...
|
|
Almost on the road: b11 sunny breadvan, e36 tds, 325i skidcar,
nearly there: ford f250 tathauler, suzuki alto, u11 bluey
not for a while: ford pop, 32 rails,
not in this lifetime: ruby, '29 hillman
''unfortanatly I'm quite old and scruffy and in need of some loving. my drive shaft needs a new boot....''
|
|
stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 14,956
Club RR Member Number: 174
Member is Online
|
|
Jun 20, 2011 22:19:15 GMT
|
Yup old mags are the best. I recently went through my entire magazine collection and binned anything that wasn't Custom Car/Street Machine. I must've read every issue of Street Machine from the late 80s to early 2000s 30 times and still find them enjoyable, whereas if I pick Retro Cars up for a 2nd go it's boring.
Matt
|
|
|
|
|