|
|
May 17, 2010 21:12:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2010 21:44:06 GMT
|
tad lower lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2010 21:53:20 GMT
|
Crikey! That single-cab behind isn't exactly normal either! OK then.
|
|
|
|
street
Posted a lot
6.2 ft/lbs of talk
Posts: 4,662
|
|
May 17, 2010 22:49:43 GMT
|
Utterly mental!! Love the extremity of these display vehicles, great fun
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2010 22:55:12 GMT
|
Is that the "squashed bug" painted green?
|
|
Last Edit: May 17, 2010 23:01:24 GMT by leigh
Club Retro Rides Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
^^And if so, for how long?
|
|
Team Blitz Ford Capri parts worldwide: Restoration, Road, or Race. Used, Repro, and NOS, ranging from scabby to perfect. Itching your Capri jones since 1979! Buy, sell, trade. www.teamblitz.com blitz@teamblitz.com
|
|
|
|
|
Is that the "squashed bug" painted green? Nope , the rear side window profiles are totally different amongst other things . Both Awesome though , as is the splitty trailer
|
|
You've been telling me you were a genius since you were seventeen ... in all the time I've known you I still don't know what you mean !
|
|
|
|
|
Thats pretty cool. Wonder if anybody can fit in it. Matt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that would be useless round hear never get it over the bloody speedhumps
|
|
cars that i own , 1978 Porsche 924 2.0 8v and a 2000 alfa-romeo 156 2.4 jtd 150bhp with option pack 3
i dunno I'm a electrician so don't ask me
|
|
|
|
|
|
that would be useless round hear never get it over the bloody speedhumps O RLY? Also, the children or shopping wouldn't fit in.
|
|
|
|
street
Posted a lot
6.2 ft/lbs of talk
Posts: 4,662
|
|
|
No way! Can't believe it's drivable!!! To an extent anyway. I was sure it was just for display only! Nuts
|
|
|
|
|
You like your Dubs low eh?HARDCORE
@hardcore
Club Retro Rides Member 190
|
|
that would be useless round hear never get it over the bloody speedhumps O RLY? Also, the children or shopping wouldn't fit in. Lol ^^ point firmly missed methinks dark1stu..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
anymore on that?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that is ridiculous, and I'm not sure whether i like it or not. maybe its too ridiculous
|
|
SPLIT RIMS ARE FOR WINNERS
|
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2010 10:32:13 GMT
|
that is ridiculous, and I'm not sure whether I like it or not. maybe its too ridiculous Too ridiculous for what? If something is built to be as ridiculous as possible and still be driveable, then how ridiculous should it be? I reckon very ridiculous is pretty flippin' good and really very ridiculous is better. Building a ridiculous car that is quite ridiculous or even slightly ridiculous is just, er...ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2010 10:36:35 GMT
|
that is ridiculous, and I'm not sure whether I like it or not. maybe its too ridiculous Too ridiculous for what? its my opinion
|
|
SPLIT RIMS ARE FOR WINNERS
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2010 10:41:16 GMT
|
I know, I'm not saying you're wrong...I'm just interested to know more. How can a car that's built to be ridiculous be too ridiculous?
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 18, 2010 10:45:11 GMT
|
I love the little peanut tank welded into the roof of the green car just in front of the engine! A very cool idea.
|
|
|
|
|