|
|
|
Feb 21, 2010 20:14:40 GMT
|
Check this out, the Dodge Tomahawk V10 Motorcycle.  I love the thottle plates being where the headlights should. |
| |
1985 Bedford CF2 camper 1991 Volvo 240 Turbo |
|
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2010 20:32:24 GMT
|
I love the fact that it has 4 wheels, and is therefore (according to british rules) a car  even though it's just been moved to other mods... |
| |
To get a standard A40 this low, you'd have to dig a hole to put it in |
|
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2010 20:47:14 GMT
|
|
PHOAR.
How sh*t scary would that be to ride?
|
| |
|
|
VIP
South East
Posts: 8,293
|
|
Feb 21, 2010 22:55:58 GMT
|
I love the fact that it has 4 wheels, and is therefore (according to british rules) a car even though it's just been moved to other mods... I think you'll find it's a quadracycle, much like this thing is...  It can't be called a car, since it doesn't conform to the relevant safety regulations. That Tomahawk has been around for a good few years now as well, I remember seeing someone 'ride' it at the 2006 Goodwood FoS. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2010 23:03:02 GMT
|
|
Can when you go to tax it...quadricycle is a licence catagory not a taxation class. 4 wheels=car. Stupid, but true.
Its nicely done.. I like the brakes, wonder how that sort of hub/wheel/disk set up would look on a front beam on a future/trad style rod?
I have no idea if that style of car exists.. I'm suddenly getting silly ideas ;D
|
| |
To get a standard A40 this low, you'd have to dig a hole to put it in |
|
lae
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,045
|
|
|
|
|
A great piece of design and engineering! I really like it, even if it is probably a rather poor performer (and technically not a motorbike).
|
| |
Currently:
Mk1 Focus blandmobile
Formerly:
1969 MG Midget
1972 Avenger GT
1981 Datsun Cherry
1989 Corolla
1979 Mercedes W123 200D
1995 Ford Falcon
1996 Ford Telstar (bet you had to google that one)
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2010 10:14:01 GMT
|
|
wasn't it terrible in the corners?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2010 10:21:05 GMT
|
wasn't it terrible in the corners? If by "terrible" you mean lethal at anything much above a brisk walking pace, then yes! |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24, 2010 14:59:09 GMT
|
this is a much better idea, fast AWD minus that pesky heavy bodywork. (if you have not seen it by now, where have you been?)  |
| |
|
|
