Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,517
Member is Online
|
|
|
A comment by Mr_B in the Ebay thread a couple of weeks ago has got me thinking. MX-5 engines and boxes. There seems to be a big tuning market for them so surely the standard lumps must be fairly bullet proof. An original 1.6 puts out 114bhp which would be quite a bit in an old small British saloon that came from the factory with 40-50. I'm thinking Minor, A40, Herald etc. here but I can't recall ever seeing one done? Plus they come with a RWD 5 speed box which would presumably be quite easy to fit too. Millions of MX-5's have been sold here so there must be early ones available for not a lot of money Is there a funny reason why these engines have not been favoured by engine swappers e.g. nightmare wiring or funny water passage positions? Hmm, a quick google has found an MGA Anyone got any ideas or perhaps seen another conversion done?
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
|
|
MX-5 running gearrustingdeathtrap
@GUEST
|
|
parts prices is the only thing i can think of that would put someone off using one. The engines change hands for fairly resonable money because i looked into using one in the escort, in fact i still might.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I keep thinking about this. Theres also a 1.8 version and the 2.0 from the 626 will fit that box as will the Ford Duratec 4 pot. Also also I guess the V6 2.0 and 2.5 Mazda lumps (aka Xedos) will also fit. Nice little IRS set up too.
Healthy tuning market for them, several turbo and supercarger kits available.
I don't get why they don't get used.
|
|
1937 Austin Street Rod - 1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1976 Rover V8 - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 14,843
Club RR Member Number: 174
|
MX-5 running gearstealthstylz
@stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member 174
|
|
They're lovely engines imo. MX5's have also got cracking suspension setups to go under a rwd car.
Matt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
slide the whole lot under, its all hung off a re-eforcing spine that holds it together while you add some frame rails gearboxes are quite long IIRC. I've broken about 3 ofthem. the engine is nice and compact. the 1.8 is quite a bit more powerful than just having 200cc's extra AFAIK. theres not huge ammounts of wiring to tackle, especially on a non se spec model. I have a spare engine in the shed. I too have no idea why they're not a hot swap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I always recommend 'em, few seem to take 'em up.....
|
|
|
|
Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,517
Member is Online
|
|
|
Hmm, so it might just be down to expense then Looking at that MGA shot the ignition is at the back which I guess could cause clearance issues for some and he's got the original thermostat housing adapted to it at the front, presumably to point the hose in the right direction. B&D, any chance of a photo or two of that spare engine and some dimensions? Just bumping this really in case there's any other knowledgeable people about on a Sunday afternoon
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll give it a whirl sometime. its at the very back of an overfull shed of engines, under a shelf. next time I'm in the shed I'll take a tape with me its roughly crossflow dimensions at a guess.
|
|
|
|
mk14dr
Yorkshire and The Humber
Posts: 4,472
Club RR Member Number: 85
|
MX-5 running gearmk14dr
@mk14dr
Club Retro Rides Member 85
|
|
....its roughly crossflow dimensions at a guess. Now ya see, i had pondered about a MX5 lump and one of those 6cog box's they put in the new ones for my 'scort in a year or two. It was only them being a complete unknown quantity to, it seemed, everyone that was putting me off. Happy days ;D D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I always recommend 'em, few seem to take 'em up..... Same here. It's one I have always wanted to do but never actually gone for. I probably won't now because the next project I do I want an 8 in it :/
|
|
|
|
|
Rob
Posted a lot
You know, for kids!
Posts: 2,515
|
|
|
As B&D says they have a really useable structure underneath - I believe it's 2 subframes on a spine. very useable I reckon.
|
|
|
|
Rob
Posted a lot
You know, for kids!
Posts: 2,515
|
|
|
Here you go... like a modern day Jag rear ! Plus show of rear 'spine'
|
|
|
|
Rob
Posted a lot
You know, for kids!
Posts: 2,515
|
|
|
And here's your 'Viva Front' !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was actually considering a Eunos roadster as possible next car after the Celsior, torn between small manual sportscar, diesel auto 4x4 like a bighorn, diesel auto people carrier like a lucida, or diesel auto saloon like a merc.
I can see benefits to all of them fun, weirdness, agricultural practicality, or general known quantity blandess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not quite a viva front as its struts not a self contained coil & damper set up (or leaf & damper on the HA) so there'd be a bit of fab to do to deal with that (and at the rear too) but its not beyond the wit of man to sort that I'm sure.
|
|
1937 Austin Street Rod - 1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1976 Rover V8 - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
|
|
IS models (UK) will take 300bhp through the rear end.
What are the differences between the 1.8 and 1.
*n
|
|
Top grammar tips! Bought = purchased. Brought = relocated Lose = misplace/opposite of win. Loose = your mum
|
|
|
|
|
the front struts are just coilovers really. fab a top mount and away you go, the wishbones et al are all located on the sub frame. the rear is pretty much the same deal. strut top mounts are on the unitary body structure (which is far to heavy IMO, I had to lift one once...). the spine just holds the diff in place I geuss for location purposes under extreme loads. it holds it together well enough to hold the entire drivetrain together whilst you fab some frame rails tho
|
|
|
|
stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 14,843
Club RR Member Number: 174
|
MX-5 running gearstealthstylz
@stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member 174
|
|
I reckon you could get that suspension to fit another car dead easy. You could even convert them to traditional coilovers with the top mount coming off the subframe.
Matt
|
|
|
|
John
Part of things
Posts: 347
|
|
|
The MX5 running gear has got a lot going for it. As previously mentioned the suspension is on nice subframes that will bolt real easy to a chassis. The other big plus point is that the MX5 is already a classic car. Parts will be around for as long as there is petrol. That means the engine will not go obsolete as I think many modern Ford engines will in time. There is a huge after market tuning scene.... turbo, supercharger etc all off the shelf. However it isnt all good news. The MX5 is actually quite wide and to get the running gear under a car such as a Minor the subframes have to be narrowed or run arches. Fortunately narrowing the rear subframe is dead easy and only needs new drive shafts. Narrowing the front is harder as you go into space for the engine. The way around this is to make new new mounts that go onto a chassis rail. Also the lower wishbone goes a long way back and this can restrict just how far forward the toe board (pedal box) can go. The steering rack is easy to narrow with a lathe and a set of taps. However the threads required on the end of the rack are an odd fine thread and the taps are £70 but once a set are bought they can be used on many cars. Also fortunately the suspension geometry doesnt go too bad when the subframes are narrowed. The roll centre goes a little lower and thats about it. You can pick up an MX5 complete for around £800 with good running gear and a rusted body. With so much going for the MX5 I wouldnt be surprised to see some cars using the running gear quite soon........
|
|
|
|
Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,517
Member is Online
|
|
|
Thanks for all that input John! I doubt I'd be up for the work required to fit the whole suspension etc. into a car anytime soon (more due to space then anything else) but interesting to hear that it wouldn't be that hard to narrow. My thoughts regarding "classic" status keeping parts available are exactly the same and would be a prime factor in any engine swap I might do.
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
|