|
|
|
|
|
The usual suspects there. Most of these lists are written by people who've never driven most or any of the cars, based on third hand googled information by dullards who want us all to drive a late model Golf or 3 series BMW bought on finance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
only a handful that I would pass on , quite a few fall into my drool list , the rest are perfectly adequate!
|
|
'80 s1 924 turbo..hibernating '80 golf gli cabriolet...doing impression of a skip '97 pug 106 commuter...continuing cheapness making me smile!
firm believer in the k.i.s.s and f.i.s.h principles.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you can go to most news sites and there'll be a thumbnail somewhere on the page to take you to an article about the 'worst ever' cars, it's usually a re-hash of the same old same old. The poor old Allegro always makes the list. At least this article is suggesting we shouldn't want them but do! There are a couple of real turkeys amongst the 50 - although beauty is always in the eye of the beholder. I'm blown away by the DeTomaso Pantera being on the list, they sell for ridiculous money, as for "poor headroom / pedals too close together" it's a Supercar, a recognised diagnostic criteria of Supercars (apart from being obscenely fast) is their inherent impracticality!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you guys. There was only 1 I really did not like. Some sort of a (black) Vauxhall thing.
Did you clicked passed the 50 pictures? It started to show some very nice Manta's!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that is says that the "Alfa 33 was no comparison to the Golf GTi" and had soggy handling tells me they know nothing or have never driven one (or other). Also 50 pages of click though, that tells me this is click bait designed to make you click to see if your favourite car is there whilst they farm off the advertising revenue. Nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apart from the modified nova and the ital I would be perfectly happy in any of them.
|
|
Bicycle x1 Alfa Giulietta (now wife's) Alfa 156 BMW 630i Honda rc36
|
|
|
|
|
I'd have any of them today.
Mostly not that inaccurate though, many of them were flawed.
The biggest point I'd disagree with though is the handling of the Monaro. I bought a 6 month old Monaro 6.0 VXR in 2007 and ran it daily for 3 and a half years and it was an amazingly good handling car for its size and relatively simplicity for a modern performance car. I think whoever wrote that just thinks oh it's a muscle car, it can't do bends, but anyone who has actually lived with one knows that it can!
|
|
Specialist Bodyshop & Fabrication Classic, Retro, Prestige & Custom Small Repairs to Concours Restorations Mechanical Work Vintage to Modern
|
|
|
|
|
They can’t even get the facts correct. The Delorean is in there, apparently it had a fibreglass chassis. Very strange, I own one & it’s definitely steel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"But the Mazda-based Probe proved to be disappointing, with stodgy looks and dull front-wheel-drive handling."
Funny that, the one I inherited handles really well (it's standard) and is far from dull.
Are MSN journalists scraped up from the bottom of the same barrel as Yahoo journalists then?
|
|
|
|
jpr1977
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 656
Club RR Member Number: 18
|
So terrible?jpr1977
@jpr1977
Club Retro Rides Member 18
|
|
On a par with restored car makes money at auction shocker.... Really
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The usual suspects there. Most of these lists are written by people who've never driven most or any of the cars, based on third hand googled information by dullards who want us all to drive a late model Golf or 3 series BMW bought on finance. Ironically one of my moderns is the latest model Golf...!!!
|
|
|
|