|
|
stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 14,926
Club RR Member Number: 174
|
|
|
|
|
Front as low as photoshop 3 and rear between 2 and 3 and that'd be immense. Funny how 17s look "right" size wise any SD1 with 15s is gonna look underwheeled now lol.
Matt
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 6, 2010 11:55:37 GMT
|
|
I too kthe photo staight after fitting the wheels, so it actually sits like photo no. 2 as the shocks needed to sink a bi after a little drive.
I will be going for about 30mm which should make it like photo no. 3 - I hope to get a little rake for added bonus.
hopefully doing the work on the week end - If I can get some parts in time.
Dave
PS thanks for the kind comments
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 6, 2010 11:55:48 GMT
|
Yes Yes YES! They look spot on ;D lick of paint & some lowerage will result in an epic win-ride  Also.. Those wheels are working so well for me, Photoshop three takes you straight to Defcon WIN  LOL! |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 6, 2010 13:33:21 GMT
|
Not at all. RWD cars require dish. FWD can run either. General rule (IMO of course  ) How wrong you are... I'm not sure what supprising skoda means. Is it that they need dish to look right? Or using dish as a genuine rule of measurment? If your talking dish to look right , then i think this is a perfect example of how its not the case. These wheels look spot on. Not to mention the amount of cars that people don't know if they are rwd or not... Think big audis.. They can pull off a flat faced or dish... It all depends entirely on the car... My carlton although totally stock is running completly flat original diamond alloys... |
| |
|
|
alexg
Part of things
Posts: 550
|
|
Sept 6, 2010 13:42:25 GMT
|
|
wow - they look really great. I'm not usually a fan of modern wheels on a classic but they suit that Rover
|
| |
1979 'V' Austin Allegro Estate
1990 'G' Rover Metro GTI 1.8 VVC
1985 Sinclair C5
|
|
)