|
|
Nov 22, 2009 15:09:12 GMT
|
Converting a car to EFI doesnt seem too hard. Even easier if you use megasquirt.
However, what if the carbed car has siamese ports?
The engine in question has all siamese ports so not just a siamesed 2/3.
Engine is 6 cylinder but 3 inlet ports.
Now I'm guessing this is going to make FI hard, if not impossible, but ive no idea really.
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 15:34:34 GMT
|
I'd say it would be doable, there are people on the megasquirt forums with siamese port setups, and I'd reckon your 3 port setup would be easier to map and balance than a single centre port type (A/B series.) cos all your ports are equal. I'd guess either big injectors (feeding 2 pots) or a pair on the same inlet. It's worth noting that megasquirt (and also most OEM EFi setups) doesn't try to match the injector to the timing cycle, it's just there to inject atomized fuel into the engine. So, with a siamese port setup you just need to double up your figures for reqfuel etc and it should be good to go. edited cos I realized I was talking out of my ![;)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/wink.png)
|
|
To get a standard A40 this low, you'd have to dig a hole to put it in
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 15:34:38 GMT
|
You can use larger, single injectors in each runner of the intake manifold to deliver the fuel - with each injector supplying two cylinders - at least, that's what I'd always assumed ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 15:36:12 GMT
|
AFAIK, it makes port injection very difficult, due to charge-robbing type issues.
However, there has been success using throttle body type injection on Minis, which are all-siamesed. It works like a carb in ensuring that the fuel and air are properly mixed before hitting the ports.
I think Dave Vizard was involved in setting it up, but I'm not sure. Certainly there's an article about it on the web somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 15:44:45 GMT
|
I wouldn't have thought it would be too hard,providing your engine management is up to the job.As long as you're getting the correct lambda reading at the end of it all,then fuelling should be good. Surely no real difference to single point injection?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 15:53:11 GMT
|
If you are talking about the engine I think your talking about then there is an interesting Australian solution. The Holden 202 cu. in. 6 shares port spacing with the Zephyr 6 and are often plundered for their aftermarket triple carb manifolds. The swap requires some spacers to be made to get the bolt patterns matched up but the last of the 202 came with factory EFi. ![](http://www.bur.st/~oljohnno/images/runners.jpg) ![](http://www.bur.st/~oljohnno/images/runners2.jpg) ![](http://holdenpaedia.oldholden.com/images/6/6b/InletManifold.JPG) Of course, living on the wrong side of the world puts you at a distinct disadvantage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 16:26:57 GMT
|
that holden set up looks interesting. I'm still a FI newbie though so cant quite tell how that works. 1 throttle body? How many injectors? 3 throttle bodies may be a great idea actually. I'm my head i was basicaly thinking of 1 throttle body/plenum set up with 1 injector for each port. If using 3 injectors would the need to be any bigger than if i was using 6? Wouldnt the injectors just fire twice? Actually, i guess that depends on the cylinder cycle. Ive not got very far into thinking this through yet ![;)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/wink.png) Would megasquirt be able to support 1 injector for 2 cylinders or would 2 injectors in each port be better? Back to the 3 ITB idea, got any good links to how that kind of thing works in general? Thanks. In my mind (with a lack of FI knowledge) the whole thing doesnt seem too hard to sort out but i don't know if my mind is simplifying things due to a lack of knowledge or if FI really is as simple as i think LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 16:27:41 GMT
|
Oh, and yes, I'm thinking about EFI for the zephyr.
Could even add a supercharger while I'm at it ;D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 16:48:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
30psi
Posted a lot
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Posts: 1,024
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 16:49:17 GMT
|
My first thought was to using a large single injector throttle body. My second thought would be to consider what the firing order of the 6 pot is and work out whether pulsing on each pair of siamese ports is regular or not. If it was regular you could use just 3 injectors with 2 shots of fuel fired per cycle.
With a siamese 6 pot I assume the shared ports are 1&2, 3&4, 5&6
A typical firing order for a 6 banger is 1-5-3-6-2-4
That means 1&2 inlet stroke is 240deg's apart 3&4 inlet stroke is 360 deg's apart 5&6 inlet stroke is 240 deg's apart
If the firing order was 1-3-5-2-4-6 which I doubt, then each pulse on the shared ports would be 360 deg's apart.
Looks like you'd have to run 6 injectors. It should work providing the injector duty is short so all the fuel from that injector ends up in the right cylinder.
Guess you just need to put some pen to paper and model out using injectors close to the ports.
|
|
Last Edit: Nov 22, 2009 16:51:13 GMT by 30psi
1962 Ford Thunderbird 6.4L
1981 Datsun Bluebird SSS CA18DET
1981 Datsun Bluebird SSS SR20DE
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 16:49:52 GMT
|
|
|
To get a standard A40 this low, you'd have to dig a hole to put it in
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 17:25:43 GMT
|
I dunno if this could help, but apparently the 3l straight six Vauxhall engines (Carlton, Senator etc) use injectors with two nozzles, so one injector injects through two nozzles into two cylinders. I don't know if maybe they could be situated right at the entrance of the ports and aimed to inject directly into the cylinders. I'll see if I can find the book where I read it again.
|
|
1989 Peugeot 205. You know, the one that was parked in a ditch on the campsite at RRG'17... the glass is always full. but the ratio of air to water may vary.
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 17:45:17 GMT
|
Martin (30psi) that is exactly what ive been thinking about. Just tried to find my parts book and manual so i could find the firing order and have a look at the cam to see what order the cylinders fill. Books must be in the car though so that will have to wait untill tomorrow. Theres no rush, if this happens it wont be for a few months yet. If the siamesed cylinders don't fill at the same time then the injector would have to fire twice as often right? Rather than having to provide twice as much fuel.
I guess it would also help if i got my spare head out, maybe i could un-siamese the inlets?
Single point injection had crossed my mind but I'm not sure if it would be a great way to go with a 2.6 6c engine, especialy if i want to add forced induction at a later date.
Scary, thanks for the link. Saved to fave's, ill have a good read through that later.
Rich606, the vauxhall injectors sound interesting. 2 in 1 kind of affair. Ill look inot that further.
As for the holden set up, looks like thats out the window then. Would have been tricky anyway trying to source all the parts. I'd be far happier making my own manifolds and picking whatever TB i like.
Any more thoughts on 3 ITB's? I'm assuming if theres any thoughts of possible forced induction it would be far easier to go with a single TB. If i scrap forced induction ideas though, 3 ITB's would be nice. Would it be easier, harder or no real difference to get that set up though? All that realy changes is each siamese pair has its own air supply, the fuel set up doesnt really change at all does it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 17:54:18 GMT
|
www.megamanual.com/MS FAQ.htm#sequential here's another link (easier than me paraphrasing it all) - relating to seqential injection and port timing generally
|
|
To get a standard A40 this low, you'd have to dig a hole to put it in
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 18:01:06 GMT
|
Any more thoughts on 3 ITB's? I'm assuming if theres any thoughts of possible forced induction it would be far easier to go with a single TB. If I scrap forced induction ideas though, 3 ITB's would be nice. Would it be easier, harder or no real difference to get that set up though? All that realy changes is each siamese pair has its own air supply, the fuel set up doesnt really change at all does it? I wonder if there's any engines of about 0.8l that use single point injection, a 3 cylinder out of a Daewoo or Perodua or something. 3x0.8 is 2.4l, so a bit smaller than your engine, but I don't imagine the Zephyr engine revs particularly fast or has a particularly high volumetric efficiency. Three of them might flow enough air and fuel, if they can be separated from the inlet manifold and a manifold built to join them to the Zephyr engine. Just thinking aloud but it's another potential place to start looking.
|
|
1989 Peugeot 205. You know, the one that was parked in a ditch on the campsite at RRG'17... the glass is always full. but the ratio of air to water may vary.
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 18:03:12 GMT
|
link no worky scary.
rich, thats another good avenue to explore.
|
|
|
|
RobinJI
Posted a lot
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 18:14:40 GMT
|
If there is a direct line of sight down the port to the back of the valve? With a bit of clever injector positioning you may well be able to just run it as if it was a normal 6 port set up, with the injectors firing directly at there assigned cylinders.
|
|
Last Edit: Nov 22, 2009 18:29:19 GMT by RobinJI
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 18:19:34 GMT
|
www.megamanual.com/MS FAQ.htm#sequential thats cos I pasted the wrong link. (and It still doesnt work cos it's got a space in it. Google gets it tho. hopefullyWhat I'm trying to say is that usually, you don't bother trying to match injector timing to valve opening or anything like that, It's much simpler than that in practice. Fire em all together or 50/50 (batch or bank fire)
|
|
To get a standard A40 this low, you'd have to dig a hole to put it in
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 21:45:16 GMT
|
thanks, had a quick read and thats very interesting. I had sort of assumed that all injection was sequential but obviously not. I had assumed that FI was more efficent because of that. As I say, mt FI knowledge is still in its infancy. So if batch fired, as already mentioned, i'd just need to fire in twice as much fuel. The injection system has no idea how many cylinders there are or what the engine cycle is, it just chucks in fuel at a rate regulated by the systems sensors. The more I find out the simpler it is ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png)
|
|
Last Edit: Nov 22, 2009 21:46:37 GMT by VW
|
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009 21:53:24 GMT
|
I wonder if there's any engines of about 0.8l that use single point injection, a 3 cylinder out of a Daewoo or Perodua or something. 3x0.8 is 2.4l, so a bit smaller than your engine, but I don't imagine the Zephyr engine revs particularly fast or has a particularly high volumetric efficiency. Three of them might flow enough air and fuel, if they can be separated from the inlet manifold and a manifold built to join them to the Zephyr engine. Just thinking aloud but it's another potential place to start looking. Fiat Cinquecento 899cc (that's the S and SX models, not the Sporting) have single-point fuel injection on a throttle body. Quite a few to be had at the scrappy too. --Phil
|
|
|
|
|