logicaluk
Posted a lot
 
Every days a school day round here
Posts: 1,177
Member is Online
|
|
Jan 19, 2023 16:23:56 GMT |
I'm still waiting for the return postage slip to come through, but the replacement ones arrived 27mm seat Vs 24mm (measured with a tape so allow a little for carp measuring technique)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 19, 2023 19:05:33 GMT |
have you thought about these back lights( Opel Manta) ?
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 19, 2023 19:06:13 GMT by Snowglobe
I have something to say: It's better to burn out, than to fade away!
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2023 10:24:51 GMT |
Thank's Dan, glad you like it.. Just a couple pics of my modest, by your standard's, upgrades or maybe downgrades (each to his own) of the rear end.. Just kept it simple swapping rev/light's and reflector's round and opting for some smaller light's, (got good money for the original's from a classic comercial guy I know, as apparently were fitted to some truck's of the 60's) I initially fit Land rover's all round but wasn't happy with them, just thought they cheapened the overall appearance being plastic so changed for Lucas glass beehive's rear and same but flat lenses front, same as fitted to mini's, moggy 1000's and hundred's of other cars same era,quite expensive but I'm now happy with it and no further plan's in mind.. Came across this the other day and thought it may be of interest what with question's re squaring headlight's of deeper valance etc, possibly something Horrido to play about with.. General opinion was it's a hacked Herald bonnet but someone seem's to have done a pretty decent job with it look's a nice paint job too, bit surprised they left the rear bog standard though.. Maybe had had enough doing the front?? All the best Pete
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 22, 2023 10:31:37 GMT by suggs750
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2023 10:41:43 GMT |
That's quite neat. It really matches the style of the rest of it. Could do with some grille bars to finish it off a bit maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22, 2023 14:15:59 GMT |
suggs750 Love the sympathetic changes on yours, the best bonnet and tub combo. The black quarterlight frames are a nice touch.
|
|
|
|
logicaluk
Posted a lot
 
Every days a school day round here
Posts: 1,177
Member is Online
|
|
|
Another small step forward today. Anyone who works on small chassis Triumphs should know getting the rear hubs off is a pain in the backside, normal pullers just bend the flanges, a special puller is required, I've never seen one for sale second hand for sensible money. They retail for £100-200, (if anyone has one they don't need, please feel free to PM me) Luckily I'm in Club Triumph and just happen to know a man who has one, and even better he was happy to lend it to me. I rembered to ask him for any tips, to which he said tighten it up and hit it, hard. Well I tried that and failed, twice. So I called on reinforcements, and visited Mr Makita's 3/4" 110V Impact gun, whom just so happened to be visiting my mates house Which totally failed to shift it. Then we invite Mr Scafpole to join in the fun. He was a little more persuasive. Along to the press so these could be replaced by these It beggars belief, that these Land Rover Freelander mk1 studs, fit so perfectly the splines align and the drums fit back on with no modification Next step, removing the original axels and fitting these, so I can finally fit the MGF wheels. Dan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh cool...can't wait to see the new wheels on there.
|
|
|
|
logicaluk
Posted a lot
 
Every days a school day round here
Posts: 1,177
Member is Online
|
|
|
Wait, no longer horrido. This is a 155/80/13 spitfire rim The wheels I have are 185/55/15 and 205/50/15, which are very close to the same rolling radius as standard tyers, the 185s are MOTable but the 205s are toast, which is fine as this car is a long way off an MOT (not that it needs one). The passenger side was easier to get to, everything was going fine till I tried to undo the half shaft to diff bolts, they were sized, but they proved no match for the angle grinder. Refitting for once was easier than the strip down, the replacement hub, upright, half shaft and radius arm all bolted in with little fuss or bother, I fitted the 205, but will it foul the body work Surprisingly enough no. I like that, can't wait to do the fronts, (and put a bonnet on) So I cracked on with the other side, which was pretty much the same as the other side except the one of the bolts had sized in the diff flange and really didn't want to come out, but when I fitted the wheel the tyre fouled on the radius arm, so I rotated the radius arm, still fouls, change the wheel for one of the 185s not fouling the tyre now is just scraping the rim and stops dead on the balancing weight. Bottom biscuits. As a temp measure, I pulled the weight off and rolled it back in to the garage. The po had even coated the shocks with a layer of fibre glass I also unearthed this hidden under a bulge in the filler Dan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glass fibre coated shocks...?! Wow...just wow. Wheels look like they're really going to work out. Nothing like a bit of a mock up to give you a lift.
|
|
|
|
logicaluk
Posted a lot
 
Every days a school day round here
Posts: 1,177
Member is Online
|
|
|
The more I look at this pic, the more I think it needs a bigger tyre 195/65/15s seem to be a really popular size, that would give me a 25mm ride height increase, then I could use a 1" lowering block along with the swing spring and long drive shafts to correct the camber.
|
|
Last Edit: Feb 8, 2023 6:39:53 GMT by logicaluk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Think I can see where you're coming from Dan but don't think fitting larger tyres is the solution.. Comparing this pic to the first with the 13" spitfire wheel's and the one on page 10 with the 15" Minilites, there's a distinct difference of amount of tyre visible between rim and arch.. Here it look's like the suspension has collapsed, fitting a larger tyre whilst inreasing the height at the bottom, it would only protrude further into the inner wheel arch at the top and keep the rim/arch view the same.. Fitting lowering block's could make it look even worse and run the risk of fouling the inner arch.. Maybe now's the time to start reprofiling the arches to get the look you'r after as per page 10.. I'm sorry to criticise other peoples idea's and work it's one thing I hate to do, just trying to be helpful and possibly save you some wasted time and money.. Good luck Pete
|
|
Last Edit: Feb 8, 2023 10:08:33 GMT by suggs750
|
|
|
|
|
I think a 'slight' increase in rubber height would look better, but not lowering the car after. As above, radiusing the arch to match the rim/tyre radius 'probably' would look good.
Maybe one of the clever photoshop guys can do a quick mock up to see?
|
|
|
|
logicaluk
Posted a lot
 
Every days a school day round here
Posts: 1,177
Member is Online
|
|
|
Think I can see where you're coming from Dan but don't think fitting larger tyres is the solution.. Comparing this pic to the first with the 13" spitfire wheel's and the one on page 10 with the 15" Minilites, there's a distinct difference of amount of tyre visible between rim and arch.. Here it look's like the suspension has collapsed, fitting a larger tyre whilst inreasing the height at the bottom, it would only protrude further into the inner wheel arch at the top and keep the rim/arch view the same.. Fitting lowering block's could make it look even worse and run the risk of fouling the inner arch.. Maybe now's the time to start reprofiling the arches to get the look you'r after as per page 10.. I'm sorry to criticise other peoples idea's and work it's one thing I hate to do, just trying to be helpful and possibly save you some wasted time and money.. Good luck Pete The pic on p10 unfortunately is a very good photo shop and I guess was done to look right rather than to scale. I was intending to reprofile the wheel arch and possibly have to re tub the inner arch. Your not criticising, your adding your views and opinions to the debate, something I personally enjoy and learn from. Dan
|
|
|
|
logicaluk
Posted a lot
 
Every days a school day round here
Posts: 1,177
Member is Online
|
|
|
I think a 'slight' increase in rubber height would look better, but not lowering the car after. As above, radiusing the arch to match the rim/tyre radius 'probably' would look good. Maybe one of the clever photoshop guys can do a quick mock up to see? By lowering the rear I was wanting to avoid putting rake in to the body. Dan
|
|
Last Edit: Feb 8, 2023 18:47:40 GMT by logicaluk
|
|
logicaluk
Posted a lot
 
Every days a school day round here
Posts: 1,177
Member is Online
|
|
|
By lowering the rear I was wanting to avoid putting rake in to the body. Dan Thinking about it 25mm over the length of the car wouldn't be that noticeable. Dan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nowt wrong with a bit of rake. As long as it's not falling on its nose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are fitting bigger rubber on the front it would be level?
|
|
|
|
logicaluk
Posted a lot
 
Every days a school day round here
Posts: 1,177
Member is Online
|
|
|
Today I visited, waterside tiers on bankside in Hull, top chap got talking about his grass tracking career and the 2 HUGE shelves of trophies, half of which were his brothers for stock car racing.
I picked up a pair of part worn, Good Year Efficient grip 195/60/15 for £20 each fitted and balanced, not that they look part worn the centre ridge is still present. 195/60/15s are a 15mm ride hight gain and 5% speedo error.
Saturday I hope to rebuild the rear drive shafts, and then we will get to see how they fit.
|
|
Last Edit: Feb 9, 2023 17:40:34 GMT by logicaluk
|
|
logicaluk
Posted a lot
 
Every days a school day round here
Posts: 1,177
Member is Online
|
|
|
If you are fitting bigger rubber on the front it would be level? I didnt want to have the tyers fouling on the chassis on full lock, so was planning on keeping the low profiles at the front.
|
|
|
|
Enbloc
Part of things

Posts: 203
|
|
|
The po had even coated the shocks with a layer of fibre glass How much was their time worth? Considerably less than a replacement pair of shocks it seems!
|
|
Last Edit: Feb 9, 2023 20:27:06 GMT by Enbloc
|
|