foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Sept 9, 2023 17:16:19 GMT
|
So I have quite a few things up in the air right now but basically I'm putting the engine together. I have it in the completed stand (avec wheels) and am putting the head on (soon) but have run into a couple of quirks doing so. Am not sure why (checking timing?) but I put a distributor on and noticed the rotor-arm wasn't pointing where it should be (per WSM photo) despite having correctly followed the instruction for inserting the pump-drive in relation to the crank. Once I'd accepted I'd done something wrong it was back off with the sump and do the pump-drive thing again making sure that #1 piston was at TDC It didn't take that long tbf and the slot on the drive (for the distributor dog) is in correct position of 55 degrees. Interestingly there is a different setting if you are using an alternator instead of a dynamo. The drive needs to be set one tooth out to give an angle of 77.5 degrees. This is actually nothing to do with the ignition-timing or valve-timing. It's simply to give clearance between the distributor vacuum-unit and your chosen generator. Anyway. I've now got that part correct and stick a dizzy back on and the rotor-arm is 180 degrees out. It's pointing to #4 lead in cap. No big deal as you can get it pointing to right position if you turn engine once but this then means that the guidance in the manual if wrong or there's something wrong with the distributor. Both options are unlikely. Would someone have turned the drive/dogs on the distributor-shaft 180 degrees and the manuals are usually right even when you jump to the conclusion that they are wrong. What I'm thinking is that the WSM manual should advise that the large segment of the pump-drive is towards you, not the small segment. Anyway. I'll have a closer look at the distributors I have tonight and check if the arm could be positioned incorrectly but I think that would require someone to have turned the cam on its shaft and I doubt that could be done easily engine back in standWSM photo shows rotor-arm should be around this point when #1 piston at TDC and pump-drive in correct positionmine was nowhere near the position shownWSM shows where slot should sit (viewed from above)slot in my pump-drive was almost verticalslot with engine turned one revolution (small and large segments change place)WSM also says small segment of drive should be in this position viewed from under engineclose-up is a bit confusing. dot indicated is probably drive-pinmy drive repositioned to correct angle (for Dynamo condition)distributor put back on shows rotor-arm pointing to wrong position (#4 lead)firing positions/order (arm moves anti-clockwise)engine turned one revolution has arm pointing to correct lead
|
|
Last Edit: Sept 9, 2023 18:26:03 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Sept 10, 2023 9:46:44 GMT
|
So I got to the bottom of the problem and it means the guidance in the WSM is correct. I thought it would be Basically out of the 4 distributors I have the one I plonked on had its advance-mechanism/cam on the wrong way. ie 180 degrees out I can post my investigation process in detail but that's the strength of it distributor on LHS had cam 180 degrees out from the others
|
|
Last Edit: Sept 15, 2023 22:20:50 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Sept 14, 2023 20:14:21 GMT
|
Apologies to anyone who may have been waiting for more info on the last post but I've moved on a bit this week. I've no excuse now really not to get the head torqued down. Looking at the manual is advises to set all the tappet-clearances then do it again once the head is bolted down. Fair enough. You may remember last year I got a couple of tins of shims. Well I'd previously cleaned them all and set about measuring them. Did it first with a vernier but problem was they just seemed to fall into 3 or 4 basic sizes with a few thinner or thicker ones. Actually it seemed like the previous person may have had a thick tin and a thin tin. I had stack of 2.4mm, 2.5mm and 2.6mm from one tin and some of 2.7mm, 2.8mm and 2.9mm I then set about measuring them more accurately with a micrometer but this isn't as easy as it sounds as you can get a reading which changes by like 0.04mm or 0.05mm just by tightening the thumbwheel slightly more. Then it changes when you try measuring the shim again. Anyway I got them all laid out as accurately as I could then started substituting the ones I stuck in to get started (my original 8) with my pile of new ones. The problem I then found is that no matter how accurate you measure your shims you don't really have an accurate figure for the gap between the tappets and the back of the cam-lobes. My feeler gauges are 0.05mm, 0.10mm, 0.15mm & 0.30mm and with a combination of those am trying to get a gap of 0.10mm-0.15mm on the inlets and 0.25mm-0.30mm on the exhaust. So for example if you can get a 0.15mm blade under an inlet lobe you don't know if it's actually 0.17mm or 0.18mm gap Anyway with the camshaft on and off several times I got a decent range of results so it was time to bolt it down for real. But wait.... What about the inlet-valve stem-seals? I went back thru this thread and found I had put the originals from over 30 years ago back in. I needed to open a new gasket-kit anyway to get the tiny o-ring that goes between block and head so decided to change the seals too. Also noticed in the pack there were the paper 'joints' which go under the spring-seats so decided to replace them too. Problem is the holes in the middle were smaller than the old ones and I cba cutting them out so shelved that idea. I'm glad I decided to change the seals as the old ones are definitely hard. In the pic I am squeezing one old one quite firmly and it's not squashing. Also noticed that #1 exhaust-valve spring wasn't on right. It was sitting on the edge of its seat so have put that back in place. Am guessing the tappet-clearance for that will be well-out now. I put my new camshaft bearings in the other day too. Prior to starting the valve-clearance checks. And lastly. The little o-ring mentioned above.... I sat it in its place in the gasket and it fell straight into the timing-cover I was just about to start dismantling the engine from stand etc while looking for a torch and wondering if I could turn the engine upside-down to make it fall out when I spotted it sitting on a shoulder behind the cam-chain. Result So that's me finally ready to bolt it down but.... The WSM says the bolts should be dipped in Shell Ensis 256 first so I asked on the Facebook group for opinion on this and they came thick & fast with lots of differing opinions so that's another delay I guess NB I broke my decent camera the other day (it fell off a roof I was working on) so last pics are a bit poor quality as the stand-in camera isn't as good (more so with colour/light than detail) new cam bearings in place manual gives various valve-clearance figs dependent on what head/cam you have. I'm going with Mk2 figs as despite having 4 series head I have STD cam shims measured some valve stuff found in gasket set joints for under valve-spring seats. hole in centre of new joints seems too small old stem-seals. 'I crush your head' has little/no effect new seals squish fine this goes between block & head. dropped it down timing-cover but 'Praise the Lord!' managed to retrieve it
|
|
Last Edit: Sept 15, 2023 22:25:13 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
Darkspeed
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,873
Club RR Member Number: 39
|
|
Sept 15, 2023 10:07:35 GMT
|
So you are using the L4 533 head with STD MK2 Springs/Cam and Carrier?
Solution to the clearance measuring is getting a set of imperial gauges - even a cheap set should allow combinations to measure in 0.0005" increments!
Measuring on the micrometer you should only tighten as far as the pressure on the ratchet thumb wheel - i.e. lightly
|
|
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Sept 15, 2023 21:57:48 GMT
|
So you are using the L4 533 head with STD MK2 Springs/Cam and Carrier? Yes that's what was on the car when I bought it. - 533 head
- no oil drain
- STD cam & carrier
- single valve-springs (with seals on inlets)
- Solex carb
- 25D4 distributor
|
|
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 14,953
Club RR Member Number: 174
|
|
Sept 16, 2023 9:11:45 GMT
|
I'd just bolt the head down with the thinnest shims you've got fitted then set the clearances from there.
It's not the correct way to accurately measure thickness, but for shims it's usually more repeatable if you're inexperienced to clamp the thumbwheel down. You only need to know the difference in thickness between individual shims so it makes no difference.
|
|
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
|
|
|
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
|
Well. I'm finally back welding (with a new regulator) and have to say I'm very encouraged by how it's turning out. The pics may b=not look very impressive but I'm really pleased that I'm getting the shape of the repairs right as I had basically nothing to reference from and I now know I can fix it no probs. Once this bonnet is done (the incorrect late one) I think I'll paint it matte black and not have the trims on it for the 'Rallaye' look. The other bonnet will turn out better I reckon as this one is a dummy-run and I can do that in the same colour as the car. It has the correct trims and HILLMAN letters on the front corner shape re-establishedreturn lip tacked on the first repair patch view of underside of corner piece and lip also tacked onwider view
|
|
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
|
So I'm still continuing with the bonnet repairs and despite the messy look in the photos am very pleased with the way the shape is coming back into it. Am about 3/4 of the way there now and will then move on to the outer skin. Obviously that needs to look better for paint but I will be fully-welding the joins on the inner bit then probably grinding them down and it'll all get de-rusted (again). This was a job I expected to be almost impossible so I am chuffed about it Another job I've had a complete mental-block about is putting the starter back together. Well more about soldering the new brushes on. Anyway I gathered together all the bits yesterday, spent some time cleaning all the bare metal parts and had a closer look at the brush situation. It looks like the ones on the plate are soldered in to their connections . The ones on the coils/field I've been told you can't solder as it's aluminium. I will therefore just need to cut the wires from the brushes and solder them to a bit of the original wires. It was round a bout this point I realised I hadn't bought a new soldering-iron. The one I had isn't working and apparently that's very common. IE these cheap electric ones never work for more than 5 minutes. I also read on another resource that one guy drilled the soldered connections for the ones I wanted to de-solder. I did have a go at that with a tiny drill but figured I was just going to break the drill-bit. Will wait till I get a new soldering-iron. Point is now that all the bits are on the bench together it seems more do-able. One problem is that the plastic insulator on the main terminal is cracked and now I can't find one on Ebay etc. Am sure i had one in my watch list for ages. I may be able to glue the old one back together. Whilst trawling the 'Net for this part I found you can (could) get all sorts of Lucas kits for starters/alternators/distributors etc and they had all these bits in them. can't see one for a started for sale right now but here is one for the dynamo for £5 and that's what I'm planning to refurbish after the starter front of inner panel shaping up well starter-motor parts laid out for re-assembly end-plate cleaned up. need to remove old brushes which seem to be soldered into terminals have kept all the little parts from terminal in right order but plastic insulator is broken
|
|
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: Jul 8, 2024 12:37:46 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
|
So I got the other two brushes done. Won't go into as much detail on that except to say I didn't bother drilling-out the other brush connected to the commutator-plate. Just soldered it. After that I ended up having a go at fitting the motor back together despite not planning to do that. Am sure there was a good reason for planning another delay but now I can't think of it. It turned out to be a lot more fiddly than I expected in some ways but not others and I also found out there are still things needing done. Plus a glance at the Imp WSM manual shows that there are several tests you can do to check everything is right 'electrics-wise' and it would make sense to do all those checks before I try to spin it on a battery. I'll pad-out the blurb later but I need a new bush for one end, I think I've lost one of the washers that goes on the commutator shaft, I probably need a new armature and I can't find the bit of 'paper' that isolates the stuff inside from the body and I can't find the metal band that goes round the outside - despite seeing that 2 days ago. One of the washers I found on the floor (I think) but don't know which end it was from and it could be from something else entirely. Also, surprisingly, can't find a Lucas manual or anything online which gives comprehensive details on the part-numbers etc. I've found bits and pieces of info that are helpful but sometimes contradictory. Anyway. Here's some pics and I'll explain more later trial-fitting commutator-pate noticed (original) brush tails very close to body of motor whereas new long-tail brush from field-coils looks fine new commutator-plate brush also looks very close removing parts of original short-tail field-coil brush new brush soldered on job done 2nd original brush cut away from commutator-plate new one on
|
|
Last Edit: Jul 10, 2024 21:27:39 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Jul 10, 2024 22:16:55 GMT
|
It's probably easier to make a new post rather than edit the one above so here goes So yeah brushes sorted then try to fit the poles, coils, armature etc. I had read before somewhere that fitting the armature is very tricky as the brushes are forced right in with the springs and you can't easily pull the 4 of them out enough from it to sit right inside. For that reason I didn't attempt to fit the brush-springs on this dummy-run. I put the commutator end-plate on first (which now has the delicate field-coils hanging from it) then you can fit the 4 poles inside each coil and put their screws in then you can slide the armature in from the open end. The coil-terminal needs to have something put on it before you fit it and on my first attempt I put the (broken) plastic thing on with its metal collar slid on top. When I tried to put the armature in it wouldn't go home and it wasn't due to the brushes so, looking through the 'windows' in the body/casing I could see it was fouling the stem of the terminal on the coils. I had noticed this was a bit twisted but as I hadn't touched it assumed that was its correct shape. There was no way the armature was getting past is so, reluctantly, I tried bending it carefully t allow the armature to pass. If that breaks then I'll need new coils ffs! The terminal has a flat part on one side which corresponds with the plastic insulator. It looks like its purpose is to shield the terminal from something in the assembly on top of the thing already being insulated where it meets the end-plate. Anyway straightening up the terminal has moved the flat part round a little but I still don't know what its purpose is. It took a couple of goes to get the terminal clear of the armature but it seems fine now and I also realised the collar goes on top, outside the end-cap - not under it. Also, reading back on this thread, I see that when I was dismantling the starter I felt the terminal twisting as the nut was tight. So that explains why it wasn't right. The next issue I had was the armature wouldn't now go in. It's a royal PitA every time the coils need to come out as you need to take all the poles out to do it but the armature would go back in ok once they were back in. Now it was knocking against the poles despite them being screwed fully in. It was then a case of taking everything back out and just putting the poles in and the armature cleared them fine again. I did consider that, perhaps, the poles only go in one way and I also marked them (during strip-down) so they went back in their original locations but they look identical to each other and no mater what side is up or down. Anyway putting it all back together again it was fine this time but I was starting to get stressed out my nut about breaking the aluminium coils. I'd also noticed by then that the commutator is badly worn where the brushes meet it and also the tape on the coils is a bit fragile. It just looks like normal sellotape so am sure I could re-do it but surely it's not that simple. I also noticed there is a load of side-to-side movement between the armature-shaft and the copper (?) bush in the end-plate. That's the one at end furthest away from the flywheel. As I was saying above there's no easy reference source for the part-number for these and there are a few different sizes and I have several on my Ebay watchlist which are all different. I measured mine to be approx 18mm long and OD 20+mm and ID is about 19 but would obviously be less than that if it wasn't worn. I emailed an Ebay seller to see if he could check the dimensions of one he has listed which I think is the right one. I think the last thing to mention for this installment is that there seems to be a lot of end-float. I've not measured it or check the limits in the manual but you can see from the pics how much there is and, fair enough, I'm missing one or both of the original shims/washers but I don't think they'd take up that amount of slack coils installed with plastic insulator and its metal collar under end-plate under spring-tension the brushes would prevent commutator from going fully home brush-springs not fitted yet allows brushes to move clear of commutator this bend in coils-terminal was stopping armature from going fully home looking at the parts outside the case shows there is definitely a problem re-shaping the coil-terminal still too close and angle looks wrong on top bare case with poles only fitted - to check armature will pass thru all good again coil fitted again with only the plastic insulator on. flat part on terminal coincides with broken tail of insulator metal collar goes over insulator on outside of end-plate tape is coming off coils commutator looks badly worn next to face of new brushes endfloat seems excessive
|
|
Last Edit: Jul 10, 2024 22:21:24 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Jul 11, 2024 20:30:25 GMT
|
|
|
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Jul 16, 2024 21:27:20 GMT
|
|
|
Last Edit: Jul 17, 2024 20:00:19 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Jul 17, 2024 20:43:00 GMT
|
|
|
Last Edit: Jul 21, 2024 1:45:29 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: Jul 19, 2024 0:57:02 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
|
So back to the electrical units.... I got my Lucas/Rootes 1967 catalogue, which I found very interesting and useful, and satisfied I'd ID'd the armature properly for the starter ordered a NOS one from Italy. There was another, slightly cheaper, in Slovenia but it had no markings on it that I could see and I asked the seller to check and at the same time made a cheeky Best Offer to the Italian seller for their one. Got home to find the Slovenian seller hadn't answered but the Italian one had accepted my offer so for £53.36 I have a NOS armature on its way. I would love to get the original fixed but what would that cost? £150? £200? who knows.... The original price was EUR 58.00 (£48.90) with EUR 16.00 (£13.49) P&P so I saved a tenner. The Slovenian one was only £28.66, with similar P&P costs, so it's perhaps a pity they didn't reply as I'd have saved another tenner but I like the look of the Italian one as it's in the original box whereas the Slovenian one looked like a library photo. So I still need to press the new bush into the starter but when the new armature arrives that'll be it ready to go. I started cleaning/examining the dynamo and have come to the conclusion it's actually a mixture of various C40 parts but I think it will work fine on the Imp engine. As shown before the casing is from 1971 but the armature is from 67. The number on the commutator-end bracket doesn't match anything in my Lucas catalogue and neither does the number on the drive-end bracket but I can see that one online in various places at least. I think the commutator one must be a good bit older. The catalogue shows the dynamo fitted to 1968 Imps was 22715E and this one is 22715K. I'm pretty sure the letter suffix is year-related which seems pointless as the cases are stamped with week-number and year already but the catalogue shows the 22715 units had a drive-end bracket which didn't use the sort of rivetted tripod thing to retain the bearing like mine has. It seems a bit obvious but the suffixes sort of match the car-reg ones... like my 1967 car is an E-reg and K-reg cars were used in 1971. Surely it can't be that. As well as the mismatched parts I found the pulley is a MOWOG item. Fair enough as these starter were used on all sorts of vehicles (MOWOG is basically an early version of BMC) but it lead me (back) to the Imp parts list which shows a bewildering amount of pulleys used on the Imp range. 5 different dynamo pulleys. 3 different water-pump pulleys and 5 different dynamo fans. I said earlier about the WSM giving details of how to do electrical-checks on the units. Well I found myself getting the multimeter out and combined with a flat(ish) battery did the checks on the armature and coils from the dynamo and everything was as it should be. Bit tricky to show that in pictures but i was happy with the results. I also said the dynamo had a crunchy bearing but it seems fine. I think the fan was rubbing on the bracket or something. I ended up cleaning the case, pulley and fan and painting them and they are looking great. No pics of the black but yet but a while back I did a gutter-repair and needed some black paint early in the morning and ended up with something from Screwfix or Toolstation which looked a but dubious but there was nothing else. After etch-priming then priming (undercoating?) the parts I needed something waterproof to go on top and as i had nothing else reached for the emergency paint. It looks fantastic and seems quite tough and has a sort of semi-gloss look. On the subject of paint it seems the dynamo was originally painted with red-oxide primer inside and it even went on the poles. I'm no expert but surely they need to be bare metal for the rotating armature to get max EMF going. In a similar vein the coils themselves are oily as well as having tatty oil-impregnated tape on them. This didn't seem to affect the Ohms reading I got over them (manual says should be 6 ohms) but like the pole-shoes I would have thought cleanliness was important. Whilst looking for advice on what tape to rewind them with I came across a resource where a person who reconditions these things said they are fit only for scarp if they have oil on them. I think I'll just get a new bearing, clean the paint off the shoes, clean and re-tape the coils and put it into service. Having said that I just bought another C40 for a tenner off Ebay as am curious to see what parts that has on it. I've also emailed the Rootes Archive Trust to ask for copies of the drawings for all the different pulleys & fans I'm not expecting a quick reply there but it will be interesting to see if the pulleys I have are anything like the right sizes. oily dynamo casing cleaned inside reveals what looks like red-oxide paintpole-shoes seem to have same paint on them why does my Imp dynamo have a Morris/Wolseley pulley? rust/grease/loose paint cleaned off pulley and fan prior to etch-primer dynamo case cleaned. 22715E was fitted to 1968 Imps. 22715K is from 1971 number on drive-end bracket doesn't seem right for the 22715 unit commutator-end bracket also not matching 22715 casing after normal primer over black etch-primer used this as top-coat removing oil-contaminated tape from one of dynamo coils coils also need de-oiled
|
|
Last Edit: Jul 21, 2024 10:34:56 GMT by foxy99
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
jimi
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 2,198
|
|
|
Be careful trying to take the oil off, the coil wire is lacquered/enameled to provide insulation if you damage/remove the lacquer the wires will short together and render the coils useless. The tape used back in the day was empire tape or Egyptian cotton tape, often varnished after application to tighten it onto the coil windings. EDIT IIRC remmoc is in the armature winding business he would be the man for advice on these things Linky be worth getting in touch with him
|
|
Last Edit: Jul 21, 2024 11:22:28 GMT by jimi
Black is not a colour ! .... Its the absence of colour
|
|
foxy99
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,452
|
|
Jul 21, 2024 11:49:34 GMT
|
Thanks for that jimiI was wondering what tape to use and was going to clean the coils with contact-spray, so no abrasion
|
|
1974 Daimler Double-Six VDP 1965/67 Hillman Imp pick-up 1984 VW Polo breadvan 1970s Yamaha Twins (4) 1976 Honda SS50ZK1
|
|
jimi
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 2,198
|
|
Jul 21, 2024 13:19:21 GMT
|
Just be careful the spray doesn't dissolve the lacquer, unlikely but may be worth testing first.
|
|
Black is not a colour ! .... Its the absence of colour
|
|
|