vulgalour
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 7,279
Club RR Member Number: 146
|
|
Nov 30, 2021 18:06:38 GMT
|
Old belt - no problems
Same pulleys. Same head. Same block.
New belt - walking out of time with engine rotation
Both belts - Gates 5024. Same profile, same tooth number, same length
I can't refit the old belt because I cut it off, standard practice so I then can't fit an old belt.
I have ordered two new Gates 5024 belts. It should be the correct belt for this engine and, up until now, it's not a belt I've had an issue with.
From feedback so far across various places I've asked, it seems likely the issue is a faulty belt either due to a manufacturing defect or getting stretched when fitted. It happens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30, 2021 18:07:35 GMT
|
Hi there
you should only check the valve timing using the timing marks on the cam / crank sprockets not using any marks on the belt. Belts often have odd numbers of teeth to ensure the belt walks around the pulleys in order to even out wear patterns.
Cheers - mike
|
|
|
|
vulgalour
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 7,279
Club RR Member Number: 146
|
|
Nov 30, 2021 18:51:28 GMT
|
don't you need to turn the engine 4 full revolutions to reset the timing marks, if the crank pulley and cam pulleys are different diameters 1 revolution will put the marks out Yes, that would be correct on previous observation and how it behaved with the old belt. With the new belt, you can keep rotating all you like and it won't come back to proper alignment, it just seems to get further and further off time. I haven't taken it further than it going 1 tooth out because of it being an interference engine but I suspect it would just keep going further off time if I let it until it either worked itself back on time or smashed all the valves into the pistons.
reliantscimitar: I'm not relying on the belt itself to give me the timing, I'm using the timing marks on the pulleys, as per the manual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30, 2021 20:36:58 GMT
|
Are you counting the revolutions from the crank or cam?
|
|
|
|
vulgalour
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 7,279
Club RR Member Number: 146
|
|
Nov 30, 2021 21:41:58 GMT
|
A bit longer a post now I've finished work for today, so you've got a bit more details on what I've actually done.
I removed the head because of a failed head gasket. Before removing the head, I followed all the instructions to make sure the timing belt was in the correct location as per the manual, and then dismantled everything required to remove the head from the car. The head has not been dismantled or rebuilt, because it hasn't overheated and the issue was purely a bad gasket, there was no need. Therefore, crankshaft and camshaft have not been disturbed. I then rebuilt the engine, new gasket, reconnected everything I needed to, and fitted a brand new timing belt. The crankshaft and camshaft pulleys had not moved from where they were when I removed the head so the new timing belt went on in exactly the same location as the old one came off. Additionally, before doing all of this the car was running properly with no timing issues as you can see in the most recent Princess video (check back a couple of posts for that). Nothing I've done should have affected the timing in any way, I've been extremely careful about that.
I have checked all of these things too, to try and figure out what might be amiss, even things that might not be relevant to the issue:
Distributor setting - removed and refitted as per manual. Points/Condensor - car is running hall effect electronic ignition, no points gap or bad condensor to worry about Rotor arm/cap - clean, very few miles, no sign of damage Plug leads - flexible, no arcing, good connection Coil - appears to be working as it should, connections clean and good Spark - Nice and healthy Fuel - getting all the way to the cylinders Spark plugs - correctly gapped, healthy spark Firing order - exactly as the book describes it Compression - yes, plenty Head bolts - torqued correctly, and checked twice Tensioner - roller type, no tensioner spring. Roller is free moving, tensioner isn't moving out of alignment once set, is putting a relevant amount of tension on the belt Alternator - belt goes around the crankshaft pulley, no belt damage, alternator not seized, V profile rather than toothed Timing belt - no sign of damage, correct profile teeth, correct number of teeth, brand new Gates 5024 toothed belt of appropriate size and application for this engine. Identical (as far as I can tell) to the belt that was removed which was the same model and design Battery - in good health Starter motor - in excellent health Clutch and hydraulics - operating as they should, not dragging or sticking or leaking (though obviously can't test with the engine running yet) Carburettor - not leaking, overflowing, or suffering from vacuum leaks Cam and Crank pulleys - tight, not loose, haven't been disturbed
I will add that a long time ago I have had this problem with this car. When I first got the car in 2014, the timing belt was an unknown quantity (as was the rest of the car really) and while you could get it to be timed correctly, it wouldn't stay put and would drift off like it is doing now. Previous owner/s had adjusted the distributor, the carburettor, and I believe the plug firing order to compensate so the car ran badly rather than not at all. We replaced the timing belt, which stabilised that side of things, corrected the distributor timing, readjusted the carburettor, and corrected the plug firing order and then it ran fine.
That I'm back where I was when I first got the car in terms of running issues is quite frustrating. I know the carburettor is adjusted correctly, the firing order is correct, and the distributor is set correctly for where the timing belt was when initially set correctly. I feel like that elminates everything but the timing belt.
Things I haven't changed: Head Crankshaft pulley Camshaft pulley Tensioner
I know what it's doing is not something it should be able to do. I know that's not how it's supposed to work. All I can do is tell you that this is what it's doing and that I don't understand why. So far, general consensus from folks I've spoken to outside of the forum has been it's probably a bad belt or an incorrect belt. This sort of problem is precisely why I dislike working on engines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30, 2021 22:49:54 GMT
|
First of all I know nothing about this engine design, but has the cam or crank pulley come loose or the woodruff key broken or moved on the taper, its the only thing I can think of that would alter the timing marks when rotated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First of all I know nothing about this engine design, but has the cam or crank pulley come loose or the woodruff key broken or moved on the taper, its the only thing I can think of that would alter the timing marks when rotated. Although any of those faults could alter the timing, since the marks are on the pulleys, it would not be evident unless the valves and pistons came into contact; the problem must lie with the belt itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A strange one, the only way the timing can change is if the belt is jumping a tooth or you have mismatched sprockets, with a belt fitted with all the slack on the tensioner side and the tensioner then set correctly I have never had any problems. With the cold weather is the belt getting very stiff so you can't tension it properly? might be worth putting it on top of a radiator then try fitting it.
|
|
|
|
vulgalour
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 7,279
Club RR Member Number: 146
|
|
|
It's too wet out to be fitting the new belt that arrived, hopefully the weekend will be better weather. The old belt I took off before removing the head felt stiffer than the new one that's one. The new belts I've not fitted yet both feel stiffer than the new one that's on and more like the old one I took off. Hopefully all this faff really is just down to a bad belt since I shouldn't really be able to tell a difference in the stiffness of the belts as there shouldn't really be one. glenanderson: It can't be mismatched pulleys, as I've mentioned a couple of times, because the pulleys are the exact same ones the old belt was running on with the exact same make and model of belt as the new belt. gtviva: If you got four revolutions to get back to where you started, the marks end up misaligned. Go another four and it's misaligned further. My working theory is that the belt I've fitted is bad and has some stretchiness to it that it shouldn't have. I'm assuming that the belt itself is stretching a tiny bit every time it's rotated because of the tension it's under and more revolutions stretch the belt further. When I take the belt off it's relaxing back to its original size which is why it's going back on at the same marks but then when you rotate it, the belt is stretching out again. Now, I know the tensioner should take out the slack as it rotates but since it's not a sprung tensioner, it's not compensating for the loss of tension. Maybe there's one rounded off tooth on the belt that's causing it to slip unseen, maybe the belt is stretching enough to flatten a tooth allowing the belt to slip to a new position. After all, I can't see every single portion of the pulleys and belts at the same time as I rotate the engine, so it's possible. It's only a theory though. If it turns out the new belt doesn't do this then it's the theory I'll have to accept since I won't know either way. If it turns out the new belt does exactly the same thing then I have no idea how to fix it, so here's hoping the new belt fixes the problem.
|
|
|
|
vulgalour
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 7,279
Club RR Member Number: 146
|
|
|
Good news: it was the belt at fault! The one I took off felt weirdly spongy and the tooth profile looked shorter in depth than the new belt. I guess it was just a bad belt. New belt on and the wandering timing issue has gone away, the timing marks now stay correctly in relation to one another no matter how many times you rotate the engine.
However, I cannot get the car to run. I can get it to crank over and misfire and that's all it wants to do. This suggests a timing issue and it sounds like plugs out of order (I'll upload a short clip later when I've time to edit down a section), it sounds like three pops out of the exhaust and sometimes one pop out of the carb. The confusing thing is I've followed what the manual directs to do and Pat has double-checked my work against the instructions and everything appears to be as it should. Maybe I've missed something really obvious here?
I know it'll be asked more than once so I'll say it again here: I've followed the instructions in the manual, and Pat has double checked my work. It's correct according to the book.
|
|
|
|
glenanderson
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 4,340
Club RR Member Number: 64
|
|
|
With the plugs out, rotate the engine so number 1 cylinder is on compression. Look to see where the rotor arm is actually pointing, and make sure the lead is going to the right place. Repeat through the other cylinders.
Make sure you have a spark too. Get Pat to hold a plug lead in his teeth, and crank the engine over. If he dances up and down, all is good. 🤣
|
|
My worst worry about dying is my wife selling my stuff for what I told her it cost...
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent news on the belt; it had to be that. As for non starting, if the plug leads have been removed from the distributor cap at some point, could they have been replaced in the correct order, but one cylinder out in either direction? Many years ago I was called out to a Granada suffering exactly that problem. It’s not always immediately obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the plugs out, rotate the engine so number 1 cylinder is on compression. Look to see where the rotor arm is actually pointing, and make sure the lead is going to the right place. Repeat through the other cylinders. Make sure you have a spark too. Get Pat to hold a plug lead in his teeth, and crank the engine over. If he dances up and down, all is good. 🤣 As above because the crank rotates twice for every rotation of the cam / distrubtor it is easy to mistakenly time it on cyl 4 rather that cyl 1, also check which way the distributor goes round and make sure you have the right firing order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You have timing 180 degrees out.easy mistake to make as cam runs at half engine speed.re Remove dizzy and rotate 180 degrees or swap plug leads on dizzy cap to match firing order.
|
|
|
|
vulgalour
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 7,279
Club RR Member Number: 146
|
|
|
All of the above confirms the issue, and Pat and I had an epiphany while in the van earlier. You see, the diagram in the book shows the distributor cap and the 'firing order', but that's the firing order of the cap, not the engine. So that means my firing order is currently 1-2-3-4 which is, er, wrong. What a silly mistake. I will correct the firing order tomorrow and I'm going to add some relevant marks on the distributor cap just to make it easier in the future so I know which socket goes to which plug at a glance. Daft mistake, easily fixed at least.
|
|
|
|
|
vulgalour
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 7,279
Club RR Member Number: 146
|
|
|
Thank goodness for easy fixes, especially given how wet it is outside. Getting the plug leads in the proper order saw the car fire straight up like nothing had ever happened. Massive relief. I'll have to get a handful of miles under the tyres just to make sure all is well, check head bolt torques and so on. Joyful moment just having it fire up today, proper bit of mojo boost.
|
|
Last Edit: Dec 6, 2021 12:37:44 GMT by vulgalour
|
|
vulgalour
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 7,279
Club RR Member Number: 146
|
|
|
Tell you what, I'd forgotten how heavy the steering is on this old boat when the tyres are a bit on the flat side, especially compared the Maestro. It's nice to see it in a different spot and to know it got there under its own power at least. Maestro has taken up residence in the Princess' old spot, which is going to make the welding job that's left a bit more pleasant since it's a bit more sheltered and I'm not going to get a random audience whenever I'm trying to weld and record it. Although, I have to say the vast majority of specatators are really respectful of the camera and some even go out of their way to hurry past and be quiet. I can only imagine what reputation I have since I'm standing on the drive with a camera and spanners quite a bit these days. Because of the weather my new welder is just sat in its box waiting for me to use it. The Princess now working and not needing an MoT is a bit of a boon and although I will be getting an MoT on it anyway, at least I know I have legal emergency transport in the meantime should I need it. Now the trick is to keep these two working while we get the Lanchester sorted (weather a bit of an issue there too) and we could even have a fully operational fleet and that's just madness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great result, the MOT exemption is useful for this sort of thing, take it for an MOT in the spring when you've had a chance to make sure it not going to overheatand the weather is reasonable enough to roll around underneath it if you need to.
Or alternatively take it for a safety check not an MOT, nothing is recorded and you can assess what really needs fixing(ie unsafe things) rather than legal technicalities and fix it at your leisure, most garages will do one for you.
|
|
|
|
vulgalour
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 7,279
Club RR Member Number: 146
|
|
|
A car review this is not. A couple of Rover friends visited recently in a rather tidy Maestro that's almost exactly like mine. There's eight years between these two cars, and my friend's Maestro has a third of the mileage.
No words and pictures for this one, it doesn't translate well for that. Instead, a short video taking a look at a couple of Maestros and taking them for a very short drive.
|
|
|
|