|
|
|
The problem is replacing traffic cops with speed cameras. Cameras only catch you over the limit at a certain point in time. They don't catch you on your mobile, driving dangerously or see your 4 bald tyres. There has been a steady decrease in traffic police while cameras and speed traps have been on the increase. Its not about OUR safety, its about THEIR coffers.
I read about garage door openers jamming police radar, up until recently radar jammers were legal but the loophole in the law was closed a couple of years ago. I also heard that a guy jammed a police speed trap only to have his front door kicked in at 4 am later that week and be dragged away for peverting the course of justice! (or some similar law)
Something else I heard about that really made me laugh, recently in France a radar beam from a police speed trap caused the onboard computer on a nearby French air force jet to lock its weapons systems onto the police van, thinking it was surface-to-air missile being aimed at it. Imagine how funny it would have been if the pilot had "accidentally" pressed the red button.....
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 2, 2007 17:10:51 GMT by Lankytim
1987 Maestro 1.6 HL perkins diesel conversion 1986 Audi 100 Avant 1800cc on LPG 1979 Allegro Series 2 special 4 door 1500cc with vynil roof. IN BITS. HERITAGE ISSUES.
|
|
|
loon
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,092
|
|
|
cool game i think there should be a time limit on each frame as if you were driving though i got 19/19 with some lucky guesses ;D i got accused of being a copper who puts them there
|
|
what the fcuk have you done lately
|
|
MWF
Posted a lot
Posts: 2,945
|
|
|
Something else I heard about that really made me laugh, recently in France a radar beam from a police speed trap caused the onboard computer on a nearby French air force jet to lock its weapons systems onto the police van, thinking it was surface-to-air missile being aimed at it. Imagine how funny it would have been if the pilot had "accidentally" pressed the red button..... www.snopes.com/horrors/techno/radar.asp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/19. Bye bye driving licence Shocking tactics employed in some of those photos, but then maybe they were taken before the rules on speed trap visibility came in? I'll avoid going into a rant about speed traps Speed camera partnerships have to obay by the much publishised rules about visibility but police force rules themselves are not quite as strict....at least the motorist has all the misimformation they need silly-billies
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 3, 2007 12:33:08 GMT by stuyizz
|
|
|
|
|
Something else I heard about that really made me laugh, recently in France a radar beam from a police speed trap caused the onboard computer on a nearby French air force jet to lock its weapons systems onto the police van, thinking it was surface-to-air missile being aimed at it. Imagine how funny it would have been if the pilot had "accidentally" pressed the red button..... www.snopes.com/horrors/techno/radar.aspPossibly not the same one, anyway it sounded cool and I was told it in good faith so I'm treating it as true! (it was in France anyway)
|
|
1987 Maestro 1.6 HL perkins diesel conversion 1986 Audi 100 Avant 1800cc on LPG 1979 Allegro Series 2 special 4 door 1500cc with vynil roof. IN BITS. HERITAGE ISSUES.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, the technical reasons why its not true/possible work what ever country you are in. Just because the story has morphed doesn't mean its not the same silly story. I got 15/19. There were a couple I clicked, it said I hadn't spotted it but it was 2 pixels to the left or right of where I clicked... So I feel morally I got more like 17. Thing is though everybody complains about speed cameras but TBH, I've been driving 20 years and never once got done for speeding, cameras or no. Seems a lot of people (and I'm not pointing any fingers at anyone here, just rehashing the old arguements I hear about "scammeras" regularly) but it seems a lot of people have a mistaken belief they can drive as fast as they like where ever they like and then whine like babies when they get a damn ticket. If you've ever seen a toddler hit by a car doing 45 or so in a 30 then you'll be doing 25 round town 20 years later... Problem isn't tyres or brakes its peoples reaction times and as roads have grown busier and pedestrians seem to be totally unaware of the green cross code more than when I was a kid, some speed limits should probably be reduced as they are "inappropriate" because they are too high... Complaining you couldn;t see the speed camera is like a burglar complaining the CCTV wasn't suitably visible...
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with what you are saying AK re. pedestrians safety....
But can you tell me why a camera needs to be placed on the A40 westway, where there are no pedestrians.... a few years ago that piece of road was classified as a motorway FFS - now there ois a 'need' to zap anyone driving at more than 30 mph?
I have NEVER seen a mobile van within a school zone or residential area or (proper) 30mph limit.
They are ALWAYS in places where they will catch the highest NUMBER of offenders. Catching 500 people doing 59mph in a 50 dual carriageway, where all the traffic is going in the same direction and there are no pedestrians, bikes, horses, yadda counts for jack sh1t when 1 curse word kills one child by driving at 45 past a school.
It IS all about the $$$ IMO
|
|
|
|
bxer
Part of things
Posts: 457
|
|
|
I'm hearing you about the A40 there... last Feb I was westbound past Hangar Lane, just into the 50 limit, when I saw the camera van on the bridge... speedo wasn't working at the time, but I knew I was a bit on the high side, saw it too late to do owt. Week or so later the £40 fine and 3 points are in the post I was doing IIRC 64 in a 50 on what is, in all but name, a motorway on a clear day, with light traffic. And yes if there's a busy road/bad conditions then I'll be going as slow as necessary. I've never been caught by a fixed Gatso FWIW, once by a following car, and this was my second roadside temporary camera...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great link. I read a few pages and actually feel like being even more careful safety wise. The cameras are a threat. It is my belief that pretty much everyone will get a ticket apart from the odd Ned Flanders. Even after a nearly heated debate with 'perfect' family in law members a year ago hassling as to why I would want a snooper type device in my car I was told "you should not be speeding". A year later one of them is done for 82MPH on a motorway. in my car 82MPH on my sat nav reads 90MPH (probably) on the cars speedo! it feels safe too (probably) in reasonable traffic and conditions if you are observing and driving safely. I really don't think hiding cameras is very clever at all.
|
|
it doesn't matter if it's a Morris Marina or a Toyota Celica - it's what you do with it that counts
|
|
|
|
|
15/19. It was the "invisible" unmanned tripods, the "Guess where" van and one other that got me.
luckily I have a clean license so far. But I wonder how long that will last.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be fair, ive never seen the point in having cameras or scamera vans in full view, kinda defeats the object. If they're visible then people will simply slow down in good time, then speed up, if they were always hidden then maybe people would drive slowly at all times, just in case. The rules state though that they MUST be placed in full view, with the correct signage which in many cases, they arnt. I just resent the fact that good safe drivers get stung for simply creeping over the limit a little while really dangerous driving goes unpunished due to the lack of "real" police on the roads. Yes excess speed is wong but its being treated like a cash machine by the government.. Motorists are easy targets, easy to detect and are more likely to have the money in their bank to pay up quickly. Easier to detect and fine than say, a mugger.
And for anyone who doesnt have any points on their licence.................... Its only a matter of time before youre busted like the rest of us!
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 3, 2007 14:39:15 GMT by Lankytim
1987 Maestro 1.6 HL perkins diesel conversion 1986 Audi 100 Avant 1800cc on LPG 1979 Allegro Series 2 special 4 door 1500cc with vynil roof. IN BITS. HERITAGE ISSUES.
|
|
|
Repost? Speed camera game.BenzBoy
@benzboy
Club Retro Rides Member 7
|
|
To be fair, ive never seen the point in having cameras or scamera vans in full view, kinda defeats the object. If they're visible then people will simply slow down in good time, then speed up, if they were always hidden then maybe people would drive slowly at all times, just in case. It depends on what the point of the scameras are I reckon. It should be to slow traffic down. Visible cameras do just that. But a hidden ones don't. It's all very well sending a fine through the post to someone doing 46 in a 40 zone after being snapped by a hidden camera, but if they've gone on to mow down a bus queue further down the road it's not done any good at all. Like Pog says, they're never placed in areas where there are pedestrians or schools, it's usually on open stretches of road where people can get caught out and they can generate the most revenue. I've been caught twice - once by a hidden scamera, and once by a patrol car. In the case of the hidden van, I carried on speeding (a few MPH over the limit, I wasn't driving like a nutter) to my destination. The coppers, on the other hand, let me off with a warning and I drove the rest of the way sticking to the limit and feeling sheepish. The machine generated cash for the government, the Police stopped me speeding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 years so far without a ticket. And when I think back to some of the antics I got up to and some of the unroadworthy nails I took to the queens highway well I think I must be blessed on that score... I once had a copper rip up his notes because he couldn't be bothered writing it all down LOL. Gave me a big old bollaking and sent me on my way... Another chap I heard of via a guy who bought one of my cars got 12 points for a similar offense.
There will always be people pointing out cameras which they think play no part inroad safety. Same as people might complain if an unmarked cop car pulls them on the motorway. A lad on another forum was pulled on the M-something for doing 97 or so by an unmarked car and the road was practically empty. He felt he was perfectly safe and while he admitted it was a fair cop the attitude was very much "but I wasn't doing anything wrong".
Most of the cameras I can think of locally (IE on roads I'm familiar with) are there for a reason I can about fathom. Plenty in residential areas, near schools, and obviously dangerous roads. I can't think of any off the top of my head I can't see a reason for.
What does upset me is the rather pointless prosecutions for very minor offenses. A chap I worked with was got by a mobile manned speed trap and he was done for 31 in a 30. That was done by a person not by a "blind unthinking machine" Such prosecutions only serve to make people less respectful of the law. 31 in a 30 is speeding obviously but c'mon... I don't think its in anyones interests to dish out 3 points for it.
Obviously I'd love to see more coppers on the streets making sensible use of their judgement to collar bad drivers and tax dodgers and pulling illegal or unsafe cars. But then we'll only have people complaining "why aren't they out catching rapists or murderers?" And if we're in fantasy land where we can afford to police our country properly rather than wasting billions of pounds of our taxes trying to police places in the middle east then I'd like a free 100 meg internet connection and a 7 pm & weekend curfew on drunken or noisey people walking past my house. Oh yeah, and world peace.
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
|
|
Like Pog says, they're never placed in areas where there are pedestrians or schools, it's usually on open stretches of road where people can get caught out and they can generate the most revenue.
Never?
Really?
|
|
1941 Wolseley Not Rod - 1956 Humber Hawk - 1957 Daimler Conquest - 1966 Buick LeSabre - 1968 Plymouth Sport Fury - 1968 Ford Galaxie - 1969 Ford Country Squire - 1969 Mercury Marquis - 1970 Morris Minor - 1970 Buick Skylark - 1970 Ford Galaxie - 1971 Ford Galaxie - 1976 Continental Mark IV - 1976 Ford Capri - 1994 Ford Fiesta
|
|
|
|
|
No Alastair. They are not.
Where I live there is not a single safety camera ANYWHERE in town.
But there are 4 within 4 miles along the A1, where the speed limit varies between 50 and 60, and which all used to be 'national limit'. There's no pedestrians there is there?
But it's criminal to drive at a speed that was previously safe. In the meantime it remains fine for folk to drive down my street (where there is a primary school) at whatever speed they like. Even 30 is too fast here, but is anything enforced, or monitored?
Nope, because all the resources are out strategically placed on the A1. Where lets not forget alot of traffic is not regular, and so will not be familiar with the locations and the deliberately confusing fluctuations in speed limit...... CASH COW.
IF they put a camera on my street, soon everyone would know it was there. How much would it earn??
£0. ZERO. ZIP.
That would mean it is 100% effective. And is therefore inefficient and pointless to the bean counters, and thus not worthwhile.
Funny old world isn't it.
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 3, 2007 16:29:23 GMT by arthurbrown
|
|
|
|
|
Speed cameras cost £30 K IIRC. I guess they're gonna want to get their moneys worth!
|
|
1987 Maestro 1.6 HL perkins diesel conversion 1986 Audi 100 Avant 1800cc on LPG 1979 Allegro Series 2 special 4 door 1500cc with vynil roof. IN BITS. HERITAGE ISSUES.
|
|
bryn
Posted a lot
Posts: 3,913
|
|
|
I can see all sides of the arguement here, it'll be an eternal debate. I don't think they're that great to be honest, but then I'm not the law and I have tried but failed to question it. So in the meantime as I've got a clean licence for the first time in seven years... I'm just going to watch it. ;D
Oh, 15/19
|
|
Volvo, Buggy, Discovery and an old tractor.
|
|
|
|
|
Speed cameras cost £30 K IIRC. I guess they're gonna want to get their moneys worth! Ya see, that's the problem with today. You are certainly correct, the Police are thinking about getting their money's worth. They're not thinking about road safety, they're bean counting like everyone else! I spoke to a policeman once who said that marked, visible speed camera vans catch loads of people. Their logic was that if someone was speeding and couldn't see a jam sandwich parked at the side of the road, they needed to get points as a safety measure! Graham
|
|
|
|
MWF
Posted a lot
Posts: 2,945
|
|
|
Speed cameras cost £30 K IIRC. I guess they're gonna want to get their moneys worth! Excellent point and a very relevant one. Anyone who's working within or close to the public sector should be more than aware that the most powerful members of staff are often the bean counters. We harp on about safety being more important but as the general public it would be us who are complaining if speed cameras were running at a massive loss. In fact I believe the traditional Gatso's only started turning profit until recently. Hidden cameras are a great thing and I echo Alistair's point about the tolerances, they need to be reasonably high and catching the real offenders. I.e those that drive around way above the limit slowing down for marked cameras and strapping detectors to their cars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i didnt think you could be prosecuted for 31 in a 30, i once got stopped for 33 in a 30, on my bike by a bike coppa but only got a producer.
I still have a clean license, despite a dangeros driving conviction at 17 which didnt result in points. i do speed sometimes, but i don't drive like a nutter.
Ive always thought we could reach a compromise, why not up the speed limit on motoways, but lower the limits in small residential streets. I'd be happy to have to stick to 20 in small streets and inner city if 80 or 90 was allowed on the motorway.
|
|
|
|
|