chad
Kinda New
Posts: 4
|
|
Jan 30, 2012 23:44:19 GMT
|
My virgin post be gentle with me, I am a man for ideas, I will freely admit I won't handle a spanner but I want to change that on the project I'm about to embark, I've built a few pretty cars in my time (all vw's) held keys to some lovely retro metal So here goes, I've bought back a 1983 polo breadvan, first on the agenda is to sort out suspension wheels and tyres.......and body work but whilst doing this I want to source all the right bits to fit a r1 drive train in the rear powering the rear wheels As I'm a bit rubbish/lazy I come asking for advice/links/recommendations anything of any help really I know it won't be cheap but I'd like to keep the cost realistic, I don't fancy having my bum smacked because I don't like dirty fingernails lol Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
RobinJI
Posted a lot
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
|
It's a pretty massive topic to be honest. Is there anywhere you'd like us to start? What are your aims with the car? Do you want to modify it as little as possible, or do you want to get the best performance out of it? Do you worry how it goes around corners? if so how much? Are you trying to do it as cheap as possible, or as well as possible? Do you realise how hopeless to drive on the road a bike engined car will actually be? It's never really going to be a daily unfortunately. It's a path that will involve a lot of decision making with regards to compromises you'll have to make down the line, so unfortunately none of us can really tell you how you want to do it. Oh yeah, and welcome to the forum, I do like the idea of a bike engined mk2 breadvan. Any examples of your previous VW's for us to ogle over?
|
|
Last Edit: Jan 31, 2012 0:18:43 GMT by RobinJI
|
|
chad
Kinda New
Posts: 4
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 11:38:41 GMT
|
That's all the stuff I was thinking, it's a massive idea I will be thinking over the issues before I run away with myself
Pics? Great question yes I have a couple but not a clue how to post from my phone lol
I will admit I did build a pink corrado before I work out putting pics up
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 11:59:54 GMT
|
Sounds like a big project! Welcome to the forum and have a video! The car in the video is a Suzuki SC100 Whizzkid with a CBR1000F engine, which makes a Polo seem huge and heavy by comparison! Might need a Hayabusa engine then! If you are planning to end up with a bike-engined car, I wouldn't worry too much about doing it up beforehand. There's no point spending money twice by changing things like suspension which will be no good once the engine conversion is done. Obviously, removing the weight of the engine and gearbox from the front, say 150kg or so and then putting 100kg into the rear will change the car's requirements for suspension, not to mention the fact that the rear suspension system will have to be almost completely replaced during the conversion. When looking at wheels and tyres, don't forget to think about what brakes you're going to use. I would imagine that doubling or tripling the car's power output will require bigger brakes. Personally, I would also say that a full rollcage is a necessity as well for safety, since the car will be moving at such an increased rate of speed and you will probably want to race it as well, or at least go on track days. If you are going to race, then choose which class you will be racing in and read the rulebook back-to-front to ensure that it will conform to the regulations. The same goes for the road rules if you are planning to register it. Changing the engine, driveline and rear suspension will be a substantial modification and in the UK I believe that will require an inspection for registration, so make sure you know the rules before you do anything. Last but not least, you have said that you don't have much mechanical skill or experience. If you don't have the ability to do the work yourself, then a conversion like this will cost a substantial amount of money. The easiest way is probably with a kit from someone like Z Cars. As shown in the link below, the chaps at Z Cars have a lot of experience with these types of conversions and can sell you a kit to convert your car to mid-engine, rear-wheel-drive. It's advertised at 6,350 quid, plus VAT, plus the engine and transmission! That kit is designed to take either a bike engine or a FWD car engine, so you could use something like a Honda VTEC engine, which would be much more civilised for road use. www.zcars.org.uk/univkit.phpIf you wanted to stick with a bike engine, it might be better to just buy their drivetrain/rear-end kit and tie it into your own roll cage. They list them for 3 grand including LSD, electric reverse, brakes and suspension. www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110806002622&clk_rvr_id=311769642221Having said all this, they do have a 'Cars for Sale' section, which is offering a fully built R1-powered Mini for 10 grand. Not bad value if you ask me! By the time you paid someone to do your own conversion it may cost you a lot more.
|
|
|
|
sparkyt
Posted a lot
selling stuff
Posts: 1,767
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 12:50:00 GMT
|
I always tend to sit on the side of yep do it stick the engine in it will be cool as fuc .. but this time .. I'm on the other. You would need to do heeps of work getting the weight of the car down as low as you can .bike engines have small clutch systems and don't like getting heavy cars moving from a stand still .they are very good at bhp but not so good with torque ..
|
|
|
|
sparkyt
Posted a lot
selling stuff
Posts: 1,767
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 12:51:57 GMT
|
How about sticking a beetle engine engine and box in with a turbo ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 12:59:16 GMT
|
How about sticking a beetle engine engine and box in with a turbo .. Speaking as a VW enthusiast who owns a Beetle, I wouldn't recommend this at all! The engine is an archaic design and it costs a lot of money to make power out of it. Apart from which, it would be difficult to get it to fit into the back of a Polo. A standard modern engine from almost any car will put out as much power as a big-dollar fully built Beetle engine, so go for a normal FWD engine. The Toyota 4AGE is a nice choice as they're small, light and were available with up to 100kW as standard, or 118kW from the 20-valve. That's 160hp, which would be difficult to get from a full-race Beetle engine without a turbo. Grab yourself an engine and box out of an old Corolla or MR2 and you're good to go, for less than the price of the cylinder heads which you would need for your Beetle engine build.
|
|
|
|
sparkyt
Posted a lot
selling stuff
Posts: 1,767
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 14:32:11 GMT
|
If its power then what you say is true . But if its coolness...
|
|
|
|
chad
Kinda New
Posts: 4
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 14:40:59 GMT
|
WoW what amazing and helpfull replies thank you all ever so much for the info and opinions, and the fact I didn't get abused lol Some very strong points to consider, maybe I'm biting more than I can chew on this route and well desired end was picturing more on the fun not the realistic hmmmmmmmmm I wish the rest of the net was as helpfull gonna chew this idea over some more I can't thank you enough for the advice
|
|
|
|
RobinJI
Posted a lot
"Driven by the irony that only being shackled to the road could ever I be free"
Posts: 2,995
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 14:46:09 GMT
|
I'll try and list some of the main issues you'll encounter in terms of the decision making, so you can get an idea of what will be involved.
Engine:
Mounting, bike engines are typically solid mounted, or mounted on very stiff mounts, this is great in a bike, and no an issue at all if you plan to only use the car for track days or racing, but it will be loud and uncomfortable for normal road use. They tend to use a lot of small mounting points, rather than a couple of big ones like cars do, so you'll need to make a framework to support it.
You need to get air to it somehow, both for the intake, and to keep the temperatures down to a sensible level. Big scoops are great, but not to everyones taste, and they can be pretty curse word-poor aerodynamically.
You need to get the drive to the wheels. The normal method is to use a chain driven differential. This is fine, but needs regular maintenance, you're moving a lot more weight than the chain was designed for initially, so they tend to wear out relatively fast, and need regular re-tensioning, even with high quality chains.
As someone's already mentioned, bike clutches aren't meant for shifting ~700kg of car, so you'll either be killing them regularly, uprating it (I don't know what the options are for upgrades myself), or you'll be looking to loose a lot of weight from the car.
Controls, throttle cable's easy enough, although chances are you'll need to do something about the amount of cable it pulls. The gear linkage is quite strait forward on bike engines, as being sequential you only need it to move in one plane. I'm not sure about R1's, but you might need to adapt the clutch to hydraulic.
Oil, bikes are designed around the idea that they'll lean in corners, this means the oil only sloshe's around a little side to side, the engines aren't designed around heavy cornering when mounted level. For normal road use you may be fine, but if you want to do much playing on circuits, then you may find you need to do something to stop oil starvation in the bends. Either dry-sump if you're feeling flush, or baffling and maybe a accumulator could sort it.
Rear Suspension:
You can't use the Polos rear suspension, so you'll need to work out what you do want to use. If you want the minimum work/modification, then a trailing arm set-up like the z-cars use would work well, as the shell's already got the strength in the right place, and you could probably even use the standard shock turrets. If you want the best handling possible, then the technically best set-up would be to go double wishbone, but this will involve a fair bit of design work, and will need a framework building to carry the wishbones. Another option would be to use a Mcphearson strut, which would only need lower wishbone mounts, and a bit of bracing at the strut-tops. Keeping things in a subframe type structure tied into a roll cage for strength should keep you from needing to add any real metal to the shell, like the z-cars do.
Front suspension:
There's nothing physically stopping you just using the standard front suspension if you want to keep things simple, and aren't too bothered about handling. If you are worried about handling, then to be honest, it's not very good on this age Polos, and the cars requirements from the front suspension are now completely different, you've changed the weight distribution, the driven wheels, and more than likely the rear roll centre height, spring rates and anti-roll bar rate, so if you want it to handle well, the front will at a minimum need different springs, shocks and a different ARB.
Legalities:
There's not really any way you could do this without cutting up the floorpan, which is modifying a monocoque, so the vehicle will loose it's identity. By this I mean the VIN number and number-plate wont apply to it anymore, so it'll need re-registering as a drastically modified vehicle. To do this, you'll need to get it IVA tested, this costs about £470 iirc, and you'll need to make sure the build meats the regulations to pass it. Probably best to allow another ~£100 (I think) for a re-test, as it's not likely to pass first try.
I'm sure there's more I've not mentioned, and sorry if you know most of this already. Any questions just ask, we'll try our best to answer them.
|
|
|
|
|
sparkyt
Posted a lot
selling stuff
Posts: 1,767
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 15:36:06 GMT
|
Big nod to robin ... on the iva test
|
|
|
|
sparkyt
Posted a lot
selling stuff
Posts: 1,767
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 15:37:01 GMT
|
I can sell you a very good abf to mount up front ...
|
|
|
|
stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 14,950
Club RR Member Number: 174
|
Bike engines into carsstealthstylz
@stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member 174
|
Jan 31, 2012 16:48:57 GMT
|
A Mid mounted car engine will be quicker in the real world, something like a Honda B16A or Rover 1.8 VVC would probably be cheapest, plus they're ally so not very heavy. I've driven a couple of bike engined cars and wasn't impressed, they sound a lot faster than they are.
Matt
|
|
|
|
chad
Kinda New
Posts: 4
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 16:50:31 GMT
|
After reading this I might stick to pretty and not a bit insane lol
This kind of info is perfect an everything I asked for before jumping into something a big for me, I think I'm gonna stick to corrados and vr's
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 18:12:36 GMT
|
Why not fit something like a 1.8 GTi Golf engine, take your bike test (if you haven't already) and get a R1 to keep things a lot simpler - and probably cheaper when taking into account BIVA test, modified car insurance etc !
Paul H
|
|
|
|
dungbug
Posted a lot
'Ooligan!
Posts: 2,852
|
|
Jan 31, 2012 18:51:04 GMT
|
Bike engines in small cars seem like a fun thing but I've heard they're not nice to use on the road....It would be a huge conversion, as already stated it would involve chopping the back end around, the headache of suspension, braking, strenghtening etc etc etc. Couldn't you try fitting a Polo GT engine or something similar? Not too up on watercooled VW stuff but if memory serves the 1.3 MK3 Polo GT engine can fit. Having said that there's been bigger engines fitted to Polo's. Have tou tried posting on Club Polo? Quite a few been converted on there so you could get some pointers. Knowing the options/work needed for each option would help you decide which is feasible in terms of budget and skill level (not putting down your skill level as I've no idea what it might be ). I looked at a bike engine conversion when I had my Fiat Cinq and it was in the thousands to do, I could buy a car as fast & a dam sight more user friendly for less money. You could just use the Polo as a daily & buy an R1 for sunny day fun.
|
|
Past: 13 VW Beetles from 1967 - 1974 Bay Window Campers (1973 & 1974) Mini's (1992 Cooper lookalike & 1984 '25 Anniversary) MK2 Polo Coupe S (1984 & 1986) MK2 Polo Breadvan (1981 & 1984) MK4 Escort (1989) MK2 Granada Based Hearse (seriously) Fiat Uno 60S (1986) Punto 60S (1998) Cinq (1997) 1998 Yamaha YZF600R Thundercat 2003 Ford KA
Current: 2004 Ford Focus (barely alive)
|
|
|
|
|
I gotta agree with everything already said. I like a bold project, but that's likely to be a daunting one if you prefer not to do the spannering. I know guys with bike-engined Locosts. They are like no other car you'll ever experience, fast enough to make you clench your teeth on full chat. But the same guys will admit they're a pain on the road : the gearing is wrong, they're revvy on a long journey, the drivetrain is clunky in traffic, you need to slip the clutch to move away. They work only because the car is light. Put it in a hatchback and the problems are only increased. The engineering aspect has already been well covered: rear floor needs to be cut, rear suspension needs to be redesigned to take the drive, front suspension needs redesigned as the front is no longer driven, etc. Everything, but everything has to be rethought, and ends up replaced with bespoke items. In the UK, such radical modifications legally require a BIVA test. Every aspect of the car will be examined, to the extent that an original and unmolested breadvan delivered straight from VW via time-machine will probably not pass. I won't say don't do it, but be prepared for the task ahead. Z-cars are indeed the guys in the know for this sort of thing. For an idea of the very extreme customer ideas they can engineer into reality : ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D www.tunersgroup.com/Videos/z_cars_ultima1.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a fun weekend car HR Engineering managed it with the mk1 golf but god knows how much it cost
|
|
My Mazda turns heads, my Saab turns stomachs!
|
|