luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 14:11:59 GMT
|
Oh my God, late with my homework again A thousand apologies for the belatedness of this, but ...well, I've been busy. Anyhooo, better late than never.... It seemed like the opportunity for a perfect day out. I was getting carstuff withdrawal anyway, so a trip down to the newly-refurbished Haynes Motor Museum that just happened to be the venue for the annual Retro Rides Awards couldn't fail to be the ideal antidote to the winter blues. As an ex-hippy... or should that be "recovering"; like alcoholics, it's not something you're ever quite free of... I decided that the best route would be the one that happened to take me past Stonehenge. Much to my shame, I haven't been there since I was about eight, and that was back in the days of black-and-white. Like this Seems nostalgia ain't what it used to be. Somewhere in my wise, silver-haired mother's backlog of memorabilia is a photo album with round-cornered B&W prints showing me as a tubby child climbing on the stones with my sister while my brother did the decent thing expected of older siblings and sulked furiously in the background. Well, the idea of taking my own kids and repeating the experience soon evaporated when I discovered the NATO-spec exclusion zone that now surrounds the place. Besides the fact you can't get within half a mile of the stones by car... except on the main road, where it's now impossible to stop, the new visitor centre they've built to guard...ahhh....exploit... errrm... manage the Stones wasn't open at that time of the morning. And even if it had been, I wasn't going to be paying the fifteen quid they wanted to STILL not be able to actually get within touching distance of the stones themselves. You're not allowed off the official walkways. I had visions of guard towers with mirror-visored black-clad marksmen wielding tazers and screaming "Do not approach the assets! I WILL fire!" So, with something of my earlier joie de vivre evaporating, I abandoned the car in the nearest layby, a mile away, and trudged up the side of the road in the mizzling rain. A couple of gates got me as close as I could, through a muddy field bestrewn with the end product of sheep's digestion. All the while I was berating my pig-headedness; after all it's not like I couldn't have Googled a thousand photos of Stonehenge in the time it took me to park the car and arm the alarm. And 99.9% of them would no doubt have been better than my feeble efforts through the wire and mist and murk. But then, if I wasn't bloodyminded I wouldn't be me and why make life easy when you can be a cantankerous instead? So that was Stonehenge then. But that wasn't what we're really here for. We're here to see cars, innit. And why complain about the weather? It was the end of January, after all! So, bidding a slightly damp and dejected farewell to the Stones, I trudged back along the muddy verge to the car, hoping no-one had used it for target practice in the meanwhile. I've heard about these country type places. "Please do not shoot at the sign" and all that... Anyway, 132 miles later and nearly in the environs of Yeovil, I finally plotted up at the Haynes museum. Funny how you always mean to visit these places and somehow never get round to it (the museum, not Yeovil. Not that I've anything against Yeovil particularly. I'm sure it's lovely. Just a long way to go to see people who talk funny. I can stay at home and get that). On the way I followed a cool little Fiesta on wide wheels when the road went through some villagey bits. Nice little car, I wondered if he was going the same place as me. Turns out although I didn't yet know it but I was only in the presence of an actual bona-fide internet like celebrity important persona innit. *ahem* Otherwise known as RMad. Since I'd never been to the Museum before I didn't really know what to expect. I'd heard tell of how Old Man Haynes began with a relatively humble collection of his own cars housed in various barns and sheds, and I suppose that image had stuck in my mind... I was half-expecting some kind of dilapidated agricultural unit in a farmyard, complete with chickens running about the place and cow poop everywhere. Seems I really ought not be so casually prejudiced. The swoopy, properly architect-penned new buildings are pretty impressive, ultra-modern yet not annoyingly so somehow. Good trick, that. They even seemed to match the curves of my Rex and it's not everyday you visit a building that matches your car! Their allure is enhanced by the glimpse of beautifully-sculpted Mercedes 540K fender through the plate glass part of the frontage, like a cheeky flash of suspender under a ruffled pelmet skirt. At this point I had the car park more or less to myself, given the early hour, but as I was having a quick smoke some decent company rolled up, made even more worthy of respect by the way Mum and Dad ...or should that be Mom... got out and then extricated the kids from the back before heading off to the museum. Who says interesting cars can't also be practical family transport? So, in the door, ticket bought and a guide book, all for less than twenty quid. Plus the ticket lets you in as many times as you like. Christ, you can barely get out of the carpark at the NEC for that. The cafe beckons with its promise of coffee, but I get no further than the exhibits in the glass entry hall. The Merc is alluring in a predatory way that modern cars sooooo fail to capture. They shout too loud of power and speed whereas this whispers softly of grace and barely-contained prowess just waiting to be unleashed. Speak softly, and carry a Kompressor. The Cobra ain't half bad, either. Most times you see that unmistakeable silhouette, crouched like a pouncing cat, and think "replica". Not here though. There are dead giveaways in the early, vestigial arches. Everyone wants the later steroidal bulbous ones that went with 427 grunt. A closer look at the interpretation notes (exhibit info) shows this to be an alloy-bodied car as well. I'm starting to think this collection might prove anything but cheap or ordinary I'll get a coffee later. I want a quick look round first, before it gets busy. After all, how big can it be? In through the strange little entry vestibule that's a bit like entering an airlock, and you emerge into a funny corridor bit with a few old bangers wedged in alcoves. Hmmm, cool enuff old bangers admittedly but one can't help but hope it opens out and gets a bit less.. well, dingy. But hey, we're here so what have we got? How about the first ever mass-produced motorised vehicle and the one that started America on its never-look-back path to the Cult of the Car? No, not the damned Model T. Yes, Henry really kicked the production line up a gear or two for his Tin Lizzy, but the first mass-produced car was the "Curved Dash" Runabout named after its inventor Ransom Eli Olds. Who might sound like someone with five minutes to live in a Sergio Leone western, but was in fact the man after whom Oldsmobile were named. You can really see where the phrase "horseless carriage" came from; the curved dash took it's name from the "dashboard" that was originally made to stop stones, mud and oomskah "dashed" up by the horses' flying hooves from showering the occupants. Over the years it's been amalgamated into the bit of interior soft-touch plastic that is nowadays just a nicely sculpted place to put your satnav and cupholders, but way back when it was just somewhere to rest your feet. ...actually, my waff still uses mine for that quite often now I think about it Over the way was a fantastic early 20th Century Daimler that was too huge to get into a pic. It really showed how a heavy steel chassis and wooden coachwork made for a substantial vehicle that the single-figure horsepower engines must have struggled to move downhill, let alone up the carriage drive to the stables. Even the radiator must weigh the same as a small cow, given the work that's gone into it And the it turned out I needn't have worried about the scale of the exhibits. Turn the corner and the corridor opens out into the first of many halls, stuffed... sorry, make that STUFFED with an automotive cornucopia. Oooooh, where to start? How about a... ...actually, I'm not sure what the correct collective noun is for pre-war Rolls Royces? Maybe a majesty of Rollers? A waft of Royces? Less grandiose than the superb coachbuilt grand tourers was the nothing short of ungainly armoured car, complete with ANZAC period accoutrements. Tough times. Funny to peer through the viewports and see the "typical" Rolls wooden steering wheel complete with advance/retard levers and mixture adjustors and everything. Must have been one hell of a challenging beast to drive Most 1920s Rollers tend to be vast behemoth things that you could hold a polo match in, so it was a pleasant change to see a coupe like this 1928 model. Very sporty-looking, not at all Rolls-ish and more akin to an Invicta or Lagonda of the period. There's one of them next door, as it happens. I turn left, towards a bloody carmine hue that shines up from the end of the hall like a sunset or a fresh head wound. I've heard about the red room... no, not redrum. That was the Shining... and have to admit a certain interest in how that's going to work. It's a room full of sporting cars linked by an obvious trait. I gather the idea is that it sort of forces you to see the cars based purely on their own unique merit rather than the colour they're painted. Because they're all painted the same, y'see? And I have a red sportscar myself. Well, pink then. But it used to be red. But before I get there the unmistakeable flash of a body finish only ever worn by one single make of vehicle catches my eye. Yeah, think about that, there's not many cars that can boast that accolade, are there? No, you're right. I never get tired of photographing Deloreans. I love them, and I make no apologies. I don't care how compromised and inefficient they are. Or underpowered. Or unreliable. Or uncomfortable Or indeed any of the negatives the haters invariably fling at them. They're unique, instantly recognisable to even the most car-hating fool, and there are very few cars you say that of. Yes, you, that powerfully-built company director lurking in the shadows at the back of Pistonheads... you may think that your choice of BMW immediately announces your individuality and astonishing taste to the world in an eyeblink. Drive one of these and see how many more people suddenly find you fascinating. OK, that wasn't quite fair. Or truthful, for that matter. It's not you. It's the car. And it's not strictly the only car ever to wear brushed stainless, the Maserati Bora had a funky roof made of it for no obvious reason. Let's call it poetic licence and move on, shall we? Interestingly, what were the odds of finding another gull-winged anomaly parked next door to the DMC-1? Sorry; not an actual Gullwing with a capital "G" if you were thinking Mercedes SL300, but to be honest, how can you get rarer than a gullwing door-ed car built in Ireland? Yep, a gullwing door-ed car built in Canada Yep, that'll be a Bricklin SV-1 and award yourself several dozen internetz cool points if you already knew that. For those who didn't... and let's face it there's no disgrace in never having heard of one before... it was a short-lived company created by American millionaire Malcolm Bricklin. The car's decline and fall rather mirrored that of Delorean; when the firm went bust due to not being able to manufacture enough cars, it owed the New Brunswick government several million dollars. Although unlike John Z, Mr Bricklin didn't turn to the life of an international coke dealer to settle his accounts. The SV-1 itself was an average car, brought down by its innovations rather than enhanced by them. SV stood for "Safety Vehicle" and back in the mid seventies, this was not sexy like now. No-one cared if your offspring were catapulted through the windscreen in a crash due to lack of seatbelts and crumple zones, as long as you looked cool crashing whilst smoking your Marlboro and flashing the shiny nylon of your branded sportsjacket. The Bricklin was undeniably ahead of the curve (only those funny Swedes at Saab and Volvo were muttering darkly in the corner about actually making car crashes survivable at the time, and everyone knew what those long dark nights and strong beer did to them) with impact-absorbing bumpers, built-in safety cage, side-impact bars and suchlike, but Bricklin himself was an ardent anti-smoker who also thought it was unsafe to become distracted from driving by such a pastime. There was no ashtray or cigarette lighter so you couldn't even look cool whilst surviving embarrassing low-speed accidents. In addition, the car was styled by Herb Grasse who had up till then been more famous for collaborating with George Barris on such legends as the Lincoln Futura-based Batmobile, so was perhaps always likely to concoct a shape that was ... um, challenging... rather than mainstream. And it had an AMC V8 motor, and those worthies spent every other week on their knees coughing up blood for most of the late 70s. All in all, doomed to fail. BUT the SV-1 did have one feature that made it cool and unique; one-button-press operated gullwing doors. Winning
|
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 14:13:16 GMT
|
And so we step through the portal from the entrance hall and into the bathing red glow that bounces from a hundred voluptuous curves, drawn by a hundred spotlights and reverberated by a hundred mirrors. Oooh, it's like some sort of sportscar burlesque in here. And yep, they're definitely all RED And y'know what? It works as a concept. You really do start to see each car for its own sake rather than which colour it's painted. Apparently all the cars still wear their factory paint; none have been changed to fit the theme, which makes it more interesting seeing how close even within the tiny range of wavelength between 620 and 750 nanometres the manufacturers came. Aside from the deep burgundy of the GK-1 (which is re-painted), most of the reds on show are what we tend to think of "that" Italian Racing Rosso, Ferrari Red. There, I said it. Yeah, despite being Italy's chosen racing colour and Enzo's mob coming pretty late to car manufacture, that shade of red is irredeemably linked in most peoples' mind to Ferraris. Which makes it slightly odd that there aren't any here. None? No, wait, what have we here? No, definitely not a Ferrari. But you can be forgiven if you were thinking "that's a 166M Allemano Barchetta" because that's exactly what you're supposed to think. Born from those horrendous post-war days of austerity motoring, the kitcar industry was a canny way of sidestepping the crushing purchase tax on new car sales... and bear in mind that old cars were really old; most manufacturers took at least five years after the end of WWII to bring new models to market, meaning their 1946 to '50ish-year models were actually warmed-over early 1930s design at least fifteen years out of date. Those new cars that were being made were sold abroad in part of the "Export or Die" ethos, and the few that were for sale domestically attracting a one-third purchase price. And that was on family plodders. Cars costing over £1000 attracted a two-thirds purchase tax! In this climate, canny engineers like Welshman Jack Turner exploited the loophole that self-assembled cars; kit cars in fact, avoided the worst of the taxation and also gave the buying public a chance to own something a little more exciting than the dreary and outdated mainstream of the day. No wonder people whose only automotive colour for the past years had been painting their bumpers and running boards white in compliance with the blackout measures desired cars that looked like the flamboyant sportsters of a resurgent Italy. And finally, in 1950 the much-loathed petrol ration was abolished (albeit some time after Germany had axed theirs, much to the outrage of British motorists) and whilst Pool Petrol was still often poor quality, at least the concept of leisure motoring was accessible again. You couldn't have run a highly-strung Colombo V12 like in the proper 166 on it, but the Lea Francis-engined 1950 Turner Sport lapped it up and were campaigned by racers into the 1960s OK, so we're over the lack of Ferraris now, yeah? Good. Shall we have a look at what else is on offer? One feature of museums (and this one in particular) is that space is often a bit of a premium. That's not such a problem in the V&A where a nice frock is a nice frock from any angle, but in a car museum it can make taking meaningful photos of entire cars a bit tricksy. The problem seemed especially bad in the Red Room, where I often found myself reduced to taking pics of little details because the whole car just wouldn't fit in. But that's fine, regular readers will know I love my little details. So how about this? Included not because it's a great photo - it clearly isn't - but it is undeniably a great car. By the birthdate of this car in 1973, the muscle cars had died out as abruptly as the dinosaurs they're so often compared to. The only choice left in this post-OPEC crisis world was the Pontiac Firebird. And if you were buying a Firebird, why not make it a TransAm? And if you were buying a TransAm, you really ought to make it one of these. Cos this ain't no ordinary flamin' chicken. Under the hood lurks the unfeasibly prodigious 455 cu in Super Duty engine, a motor so overladen with grunt that even the emissions nazis on Capitol Hill couldn't emasculate it. If you knock a Super Duty TransAm into drive and touch nothing else, it'll get to 60mph on tickover alone. Have a think about that, and then understand that should you be brave enough to actually use the gas pedal, you can pull down buildings and uproot treestumps without ever needing to get the tractor out of the barn. The last great muscle car of the great muscle car era, we should salute it. And so to something a bit more elegant, if still rather brutish; Yes, the more Bavarian-minded will have already got that's a Neue Sechs CS coupe, but what about the subliminal cue that got you there? Named in honour of Wilhelm Hoffmeister, then BMW Director of Design, the "Hoffmeister Kink" has featured on every modern post-war BMW. It's that little forward-leaning line that surges off from the base of the C-pillar. It's meant to represent the fact that all Bimmers are righteously rear-wheel drive by almost imperceptibly drawing your eye to the structure above the rear wheels and introducing a sense of motion even when stood still. So now you know. If I hadn't been enjoying taking pointless photos of bizarre little details I'd probably never even have noticed the odd magnifying lenses within the headlights on this 1929 Alfa 6C. Once I did notice them, I started seeing them on a few other cars of the same vintage. I'm not exactly sure what purpose they serve, since they seem fixed. Do they spread the beam of light, or focus it? Is it a way of getting high beam into the same light with a relatively small and thus cooler bulb? I dunno, but I'd like to. I guess that's the whole point of museums, to make you think and question And still on the details, Alvis are always good for an extravagant bit of mascotry In addition to the Turners we saw earlier, another of those rarest of cars - a Welsh one - deserved a decent pic. I just managed to squeeze it in! As if a "normal" Gilbern Invader isn't unusual enough, how about this stylish estate? A fibreglass small-volume car, yes, but no lash-up, Gilberns were quality products. Only just over 100 of the estates were made, but they still featured electric windows, wood veneer and high-class trimmings. The suspension might have been relatively humble MG-C derived, but it was much improved. And it was no slouch either, with a 3-litre Essex V6 from the Zodiac powering it along. Those who scoff at Britain's history of "shed-built" specials (Clarkson, e.g.) really ought to think again Which brings us neatly to possibly the archetype of potent home-builds, the Marcos. Marsh and Costin were never going to build shoddy cars, given their backgrounds in aviation engineering and those who mocked the plywood frame and GRP bodywork were seriously missing the point. Besides the strength, flexibility, low cost and ease of tooling, all of which would have been ruinously expensive to achieve using "proper" metal, the construction techniques allowed extravagant curves and shapes such as this gorgeous 3 Litre. It was only when the American market was being explored that the switch to spaceframes became necessary, due to the stringent Federal crash requirements. Probably my favourite of the Citroën-era Maseratis. I dunno why. I just love the preposterous flying buttresses and everyone knows that V6 engines make the best noize. It probably wouldn't even have come about if Citroën hadn't gone even more bonkers than usual and dreamed up the SM project after a late-night board meeting featuring some especially strong cheeses. Seemed a shame to waste the beautifully-designed Alfieri V6, so Maserati did the decent thing; hopped it up and wedged it into a gorgeous Giugiaro-penned mid-engined coupe. Boras, Ghiblis and such may perhaps be purer to the Maserati bloodline, but I just love the little underdog If you thought that Maserati were the only people to produce lovely little Frua-bodied Sportsters then think again. How about a car that travelled further than many did in an entire lifetime... all before it was even sold? Yep, the AC 428 had a complicated inception; based on the Cobra 427 underpinnings (no disgrace), the drivetrains were brought in from Detroit, the chassis was then mated to them at the AC Thames Ditton factory, then the whole lot shipped to Italy to be bodied, then back again for finishing. The joke was that the car had travelled so many miles before ever hitting a showroom floor that it was already out of warranty. Perhaps slightly less grandiose... or foolhardy, depending on the amount of poetry in your soul.... the humble workmanlike Triumph sportster of the day owed no less great a debt to the luminaries of the Italian coachbuilders art. When post-war Sir John Black decided to re-focus marque identity and thus Standard would be the producer of saloons and tourers and Triumph would concentrate on sporting cars, it took the firm down a road that led to Giovanni Michelotti. The TR4 might have been almost the same car as the previous TR3A underneath, but it swept away the old in-house styling in favour of bold Italianate lines... and let's be fair, the earlier TR series cars were not what anyone could accuse of being beautiful. Michelotti's treatments were so decisive and popular that he became Triumph's go-to guy in shapes and colours pretty much throughout the rest of the firm's life before Leyland subsumation brought in Harris Mann who cheerfully threw out the French curves and protractor from the Triumph pencil case and only kept the ruler and set-square. Just as well there was a TR3 right next door for comparison then. Funny to think that in its time, it was derided for the switch to the full-width grille from the TR2. Or indeed, any grille at all rather than a hole. This little row was a great advertisement for when Great Britain really did lead the world in affordable little sportsters, featuring an MGC and A, TRs, a Tiger and even a Rochdale Olympic! I wish I'd paid more attention to the information boards, too because when I looked through the photos afterwards I realised that the MGA has an unusual recessed grille that I don't remember having seen before. I have to admit to preferring it to the normal smooth-to-the body type but I've no idea why it's different like this. We'd better take a look at that Tiger, too, or GeorgeB will never forgive me! Funny really; everyone knows the story of how Henry Ford, piqued by Enzo Ferrari's last minute change of heart as to selling Ferrari to Ford, resolved to hurt il Commandatore where it counted most - on the track. Thus Lola's endurance racer was morphed into the Ford GT40 and the rest is history. Which as we all know (cos Henry told us) is bunk. Fewer people realise that the Rootes Groups' little car that could was the result of similar, if slightly more humble collapse of entente cordial. Realising the little Sunbeam Alpine was in need of more grunt to become competitive, Rootes approached Ferrari in the hope a warmed-over version of the Alpine's four-pot bearing the label "Tuned by Ferrari" would be sufficient both in ability and kudos. When talks broke down, however, the path towards American muscle in lieu of Italian artistry was once again trodden. Rootes competition manager Norman Garrad had his son Ian measure the engine bay of an Alpine using a "precision instrument of questionable antecedents", i.e. a wooden yardstick. Ian sent his service manager round all the local car dealerships trying to find a motor that would fit with this extremely scientific measurement. Eventually it was declared that the Ford 260 cu in motor ought to do it, and so Carroll Shelby, the world's fastest chicken farmer, was employed to make it happen. And so it did, though Shelby commented that the "figure of speech about the shoe-horn never applied to anything as well as it did to that tight squeak." It wasn't all bad, though; the tightest of fits meant the car had to switch from the Alpine's recirculating ball steering box to proper rack and pinion. It could have not worked. Just because Shelby had previous for wedging prodigious American mills into diminutive British sportscars didn't guarantee success; just look at the ugly mess that Daimler ended up with in the SP250, despite Edward Turner's wonderful Hemi-headed V8 powering it. Fortunately, it did work. The Tiger was brilliant and Lord Rootes, though initially "quite grumpy" about the idea, when he test drove it immediately placed an order with Ford for 3000 260cu in engines, the greatest single order Ford had ever received. The Tiger was a roaring success (see what I did there?). The Hillman Imp was not, nearly bankrupted the Group, and Rootes were forced into majority ownership by Chrysler. The smallest Chrysler engine, the 275 did not fit in the Alpine bodyshell, and they were never going to allow a rival manufacturer to power one of their products. The Tiger, cruelly young at only three years old, was extinct There is, of course, one legendary British sportster missing from this line-up so far. Sadly, despite being the tiniest car in the place, it was also one of the most wedged-in so I couldn't get a worthwhile pic. But since no chat about such things is complete without a Frogeye, here's what I did manage; In fact, we may be reduced to little detail pics again for a bit. Space was very tight. Shame really, as our next car didn't exactly invent an entire genre (the idea of the Shooting Brake was well-established) but it certainly grabbed the ball and ran with it. The Scimitar GTE was the first real, proper, honest sports estate. Thrust along by the old faithful Ford three litre Essex, the fibreglass load-lugger was like nothing else on the road for a good few years (Audi were making re-badged DKWs for VW and BMW had only just finished messing around with bubblecars). The GTE was what happened when a small-volume manufacturer like Reliant with little to lose either way employed a bonkers design house like Ogle, and a visionary like Tom Karen to design a car. Other triumphs from the same company include the Raleigh Chopper, the Bond Bug, the maddest Aston Martin ever and Luke Skywalker's landspeeder. Wheeltrims. Really oughtn't to be allowed, not when an options list as comprehensive and affordable as the Mustang's was on the salesman's desk in front of you In 1963 in Britain you could have a brand new Austin 1100 (eventually a 1300, last seen assaulted by Basil Fawlty with a tree). The Moggy Minor had only been on the road four years. You could, if you were a bit more daring and your wage packet included a few more shillings, stretch to a Sunbeam Alpine... and probably be happy not knowing that it was about to morph into the Tiger in a years' time and render your pride and joy utterly obsolete. You could have a Super Minx from fellow Rootes stable Hillman. It really wasn't all that Super, though. Or, if you lived in Italy, you could have one of these. And we were supposed to have won the War? And speaking of those who lost the War but won the peace, how about a Datsun? Or a bit of one. At first glance you might be forgiven for assuming it's a misspelling by an enthusiastic home decal fetishist, but of course the Samuri 240Zs were modified by Spike Anderson ...most famous of his ouvre being Win Percy's Big Sam. Not all Samuri-tuned road cars were air-dammed beasts on wide sports wheels and rocking the iconic brown-over orange livery. As this one, with positively leftfield wire wheels, shows succinctly! And so we're just about finished with our circumnavigation of the Redrum. Just as well, really cos it's starting to feel like being inside a bruise and red is the colour Photobucket traditionally struggles with the most, so no doubt most of these pictures are horribly pixelated and grainy. And not all down to my rubbish camera skills. Anyway, before we leave, there's one car we must pay homage to. Hard to think nowadays that the French pretty much invented motorsport. Yeah, the Gordon Bennett Cup was organised by... well, Gordon Bennett... and yeah, Ze Germans did invent the actual car, but the French made this new-fangled concept their own in the early days. You can write off Bugatti as being a re-located Italian if it helps, but that doesn't account for the Gallic titans of the early racing days; Darraq, DeDion (after whom the axle was named and the Germans stole), Panhard (after whom le système Panhard by which all successful sportcars were built for decades was named), Talbot, Delage... one could rant on for ages. Then, post-War a strange malaise overtook this once proudest of racing nations. Cars abilities dwindled away and atrophied even before the country slid into the obscenity of the horsepower cap. But before this travesty, some memorable last hurrahs squeezed out of the country before the lock. Madness from Citroën aside, perhaps the best of them was the Facel Vega. The marriage of an ex-Citroën designer, a firm of metal pressers who had recently made aeroplane parts for the Americans and bodies for Bentleys, and the frankly ludicrous hemi engine from the DeSoto Firedome (and in later models, the full-fat Chrysler Hemi)... how could it fail to be excellent? The Facel Vega HK500 (it's even initialled as a Hunter-Killer!) was, and is, nothing short of superb. Lazy, endless V8 torque wrapped in a gentlemens' club on wheels and impossibly understatedly stylish, it's just an absolute automotive acme. France might no longer have dominated the racetracks, but very few could compete with one of these parked outside the Casino Royale
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 14:14:27 GMT
|
And so we escape from the bloody hues of the Redrum at last. And the first car we come to is... yep, red. Appropriate though because if ever a car could be accused of being the British equivalent to the Facel Vega, then the Gordon Keeble GK1 is probably it. Another gentlemen's club on wheels, yet with enough sportiness and sense of purpose in the aircraft-inspired controls to warm the blood. Leather and fine fittings belie the fibreglass bodywork, albeit styled by Italian carrozzeria royalty in the form of Giugiaro at Bertone. Creative paint finishes disguise the bare metalwork of the cabin. V8 American heart providing inexhaustible thrust, this time Corvette power as opposed to Facel's Chrysler Hemi. The Gordon Keeble is supposed to boast the highest percentage of cars built still being in existence... something I guess it's relatively easy to keep track of since only 99 were built, with one thrown together from left-over spares some years later. With that in mind, perhaps it's rarer still to see such an exclusive classic being messed about with as this one has been... much to RMad's disapproval. He points out that leaving chrome accents such as the mirrors when all other brightwork has been painted down is breaking one of the unalienable Laws of Modification, and who am I to argue. Personally, I love Gordon Keebles, whatever finish their mirrors are And more red. For God's sake. Sorry. This little annexe off the red room is a bit hard to fathom. It's obviously for expensive, exclusive cars because it's got a few Derby Bentleys stuck in here... as well as a new VW Continental... plus the GK1.. and some Ferraris. One of which isn't red, but is a 400 series and therefore too hideous to contemplate, let alone provide photos of. The other is a Berlinetta Boxer. Which is fine. Although it is red. I like BBs. Especially when you compare them to the monstrosity that came after; that oversized excessively extravagant icon of 1980s taste-bypassed conspicuous consumerism the Testarossa. In comparison, the BB does a superb job of disguising the fact it's got a monolithically wide flat twelve wedged between its rear wheels like am elephant in birthing stirrups. Admittedly, it managed a lot of hiding the enormous engine whilst preserving the classic mid-motor profile by failing to provide any kind of cabin accommodation whatsoever, but hey, it's better to arrive looking cool than comfortable. You can worry about being comfortable when you're old enough to wear the sort of pants that let you relieve yourself whenever you like, even in company. One of the benefits of having an older brother was that I got the chance to experience things that were rather advanced from the tastes you'd normally have at certain ages. One of these was music. It might have been annoying sharing a room a lot of the time, but barely into double figures of years old, being immersed in the sounds of Floyd, King Crimson, Hawkwind and all kinds of stuff most ten-year olds I knew emphatically were not listening to was kinda fun. And with music, especially leftfield music, went literature. Especially leftfield literature. Was it possible to have Hawkwind without Michael Moorcock? These were the days when there were loads of secondhand bookshops in town, and Moorcock wrote lots of books so there were always copies to be had for twenty pence or so. When I'd get found out stealing my brothers' copies of things, it wasn't outside the realms of pocket money to pick up my own, even if it meant fewer shillings to stick in the Bezerk, Gorf or Defender cabinets on the Pier. And when Moorcock ran out, there was always HP Lovecraft. One of the more accessible of Moorcock's inevitably troubled anti-heroes was one Jerry Cornell... a member of the British Intelligence more by accident than judgement (although it paid well for doing not very much and was a great chance to meet ladies of loose morals). He featured in two of the more comedic of Moorcock's usually pretty sardonic stories; the Chinese Agent and the Russian Intelligence. One of the things I remembered most about Cornell was that he'd come from the Portobello Road... and this was a Portobello Road far removed from the quaint British whimsy I'd only ever experienced before in Paddington Bear books. This was a Portobello Road inhabited by drunken totters, crab-infested incestuous half-sisters, basement-dwelling degenerate uncles and a terrifying underground trader network of barkers, enforcers and gestalt hive-mind that would give Neil Gaiman cause to go and have a nice lie down and ponder how to really be sinister. One of the other things I remember about Cornell was that he drove an Armstrong-Siddeley. Now, at the age of twelve (or whatever) I had no idea what an Armstrong Siddeley actually was. It didn't figure in any of the Top Trumps sets my friends or I spent breaks playing, nor could you find a Matchbox Superfast of one, and these were the primary sources of information about cars in this pre-Google age. I had no idea what one looked like, but I knew they must be special; not only was Cornell constantly attracting attention in it (not just because the police took a dim view that he had no insurance or road-fund license on it) but also because Moorcock didn't do anything ordinary. And this was set in the early Seventies, so it must have been one of those outré concept cars, probably with gullwing doors and maybe even painted pearlescent orange. After all, what else could an international spy of Cornell's standing drive; this was a man capable of shagging international super-seductress Lilli von Bern literally to death! When I grew older, I began to realise that Armstrong-Siddeleys were special, very special, but they were not about outrageous streamlining and poncey doors. They were far cooler than that. And via family association with Tommy Sopwith, they had superb model names redolent of the model aircraft that had complemented my Moorcock phase; Hurricane, Typhoon, Tempest. And even more exotic; the Sapphire and Star Sapphire. They spoke of mysterious times and places, an impression enhanced by the Sphinx mascot (in 1912 a journalist had described an early Siddeley-Deasey car running "Silent" Knight sleeve-valves as "as silent and inscrutable as the Sphinx" and John Siddeley was so pleased with the description he adopted the Sphinx as both badge and mascot for all his cars). Sadly though, by the time of the superb Star Sapphire on display at Haynes, the marque had begun to be seen as outdated and rather too austere and staid for the vibrant new motoring market. So my impressionable young self had totally got the wrong end of the stick and Cornell probably stood out in his Armstrong-Siddeley as much as one of the Bohemian dropout Ladbroke Grove loungers as he did the thrusting young gent of mystery I had him down as. Probably rather more like Withnail and the one-eyed MkII Jag than James Bond in a submersible Lotus. Sometimes you ought never meet your heroes. Ah well, so Jerry Cornell was maybe more Nick Drake than Nick Cave, but I'd happily share a cup of tea with either (or at least the 50% who are still alive) and the Armstrong-Siddeley Star Sapphire remains one of the more beautiful products of the British car industry. So there There's a door out of this little annexe bit where some of the most expensive and rare cars are shoved in a corner almost as though no-one could think of anywhere else to put them. It looks like a door to the back stores or something, but there's no "Staff Only" sign and I don't want to go back through Redrum in case I see that zombie old biddy out of the bath-tub in Room 237, so I tentatively pushed it open. It's the door to Memory Lane Wow. You could quite easily miss this whole section! The idea behind this display is that it consists of the sort of postwar cars that used to be an every-day occurrence, the sort of things you saw taking part in the local traffic jam or schmoozing along the newfangled bypass ramp but are all long-since returned to the soil. And it's a fair point; Capris and Dolly Sprints might occasionally still pop up in general population, but when was the last time you saw a Jowett Javelin out on the Queen's Highway? An ingenious design there; the grille happens to be the same shape as the flat-four engine behind it, so to remove the motor all you have to do is pivot the grille up out of the way, undo the engine mounts, and pull it out forwards. Sadly, the cars were really wedged in here, even more so than in the Redrum, so many of them weren't really worth trying to photograph, or only worth taking snippets from. One that demanded attention though; Yep, never one to undersell a motif when he could go large, Herbert Austin would definitely have approved of the branding on the A90 Atlantic. Sadly, he passed over some years before this little 1949 sporting coupe was aimed squarely at the American market, as the name implies. And the Americans like things over-the top don't they? Y'know, mascots and marque identity and all that? Funny to see how another culture interprets what they see as core values of a country, but I suppose what you can say of the A90's too-many-mascots-is-never-enough approach is that it's an awful lot more appealing than Triumph's attempt of the same year with the appalling Mayflower... a car that not only didn't look like what American car buyer wanted but also didn't perform like anything any car buyer wanted. Austin might have only sold three and half thousand A90s to their target audience, but today it looks an engrossing, if rather kitsch styling dead end. Unlike the Mayflower, which just looks wrong. Of course, America had a few years on Europe regarding car design when the War finished... that was the upside of always being late to the party... and so it was possibly no surprise that British manufacturers were under pressure to copy what they saw as vital styling cues from across the Atlantic. We've already established they were being told to "export or die" after all. It's hard to say what Dick Burzi was thinking of when he penned the A90's odd cyclops centre light, but whatever it was, Rover's MD Spencer Wilks had clearly been smoking from the same shisha pipe when he announced the new P4 Rover 75 in the same year. Cyclops lights would evidently be the next big thing... ...although as we now know they weren't. However, the new 75 did unashamedly evoke the extra few years American cars had over British ones by adopting the new wings-included styling (usually accused of being a copy of current Studebakers), bench front seat and column gearchange for an uncluttered floor. The rear wheels were pushed out behind the cabin, thus giving a more comfortable ride and better weight distribution. The controversial and unloved cyclops light was gone three years later, but once more, a white elephant in design gives us an immediately-identifiable talking point. Technically Vauxhall were American, having been owned by GM since the 1920s, so at least they had an excuse for coming out with preposterous pieces of styling insanity like the Cresta PA. If your glaucoma was especially bad on that particular day and you saw it from quite a distance, you could almost believe you were looking at a real Impala bubbletop You wouldn't have thought there could be a more quintessentially British car than a Singer Gazelle, but even here that pesky postwar American influence is strong. How so? Surely there's nowt more Brit than a car based on something as long-running, stout and humdrum as the Hillman Minx? Well, Rootes' mid-range marque might have started with the humble Minx but it was warmed over into the Gazelle by no less an out-there design consultancy than Raymond Loewy's, who at the same time had been responsible for the positively space-age restyling of Studebaker. The Gazelle by the stage of this Series V version might have lost some of Loewy's best features such as the expensive wraparound rear window, but it did at least retain a cool bonnet emblem If it comes down to the real quintessential British postwar car, it's hard to find anything more utterly typical than a Standard Ten; a car so old-fashioned it was till named after its fiscal horsepower rating when originally unveiled in 1906. It was so unremarkably styled that anyone asked to sketch one ten seconds after seeing it would be unable to recall a single defining detail, yet somehow managed to be bang-on trend with its integrated bodypanels and wide glass area. It did nothing well and everything acceptably. It gave off no unwanted whiff of ostentation, although for those ungentlemanly enough to wish to shout about their motoring acquisition, one could pay extra for the slightly vulgar Pennant which would provide Sir with not only two-tone external paint but also vestigial tailfins of the style so en vogue across the Atlantic. The only concession the Ten made to the newfangled Americana was a slightly odd bonnet projectile; where the equivalent Chevrolet or Buick would offer chromium gunsights, rockets or birds-of-prey, the Ten offered a rather tragic little firework that was so despondent it couldn't even support its own weight. If Sir did want the two-tone paint and all that whatnot of the Pennant, but in a larger beast, then he could of course purchase a Vanguard instead. The Standard Vanguard was actually one of the first new post-war cars, launched in 1947 and named after the last Royal Navy battleship HMS Vanguard and trumpeted with typical hubris by John Black as "the most advanced car in the world." This might not have been exactly accurate, but the car was a completely white-sheet design owing nothing to what had come before from the firm. The thunder was slightly stolen by Russian firm GAZ claiming the car was a copy of their own Pobeda. The British solution to this was encapsulated by the Motor magazine, how blithely admitted that the "Pobeda showed a certain exterior resemblance to the Vanguard" instead of the other way round, since the GAZ had been launched over a year earlier. It's between each of us and our conscience to decide who copied whom... By the time of the 1960s, fortunately, the British car companies had stopped turning out what they thought would appeal to Americans and actually managed to occasionally produce a decent car. Sometimes they seemed more surprised by this than anyone, although to be fair to Triumph, when they noticed how able the standard Dolomite was (once called by the slightly warlike name "Project Ajax"), they were quick to warm it up and make the Dolomite Sprint. And they're a great car. No caveat, no disclaimers. They're just great.
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 14:15:49 GMT
|
At the end of the Memory Lane there is another small annexe you could easily miss. Sneaking through the doors reveals a room containing some pre-war British cars and a replica workshop scene, excellently "dressed" with period tools, equipment and products. There are even some flapper-ish clothes should you wish to dress up and get a picture taken in an authentic period setting. And what could be a better archetype of pre-war motoring than that mainstay of the British car industry, the Morris Cowley bullnose? This one looks like it could use the services of a metalworker as well as a beige-overalled artisan mechanic! I really don't know whether the Union flag would have been a standard kind of motif on this Morris 8, but I did rather like the unexpectedly flamboyant mascot on such a stolid and otherwise unornamented saloon. This was a car that was defiantly pre-war, having been designed in the mid 1930s but was dusted off post-war and did great sales service for Morris, being manufactured in both Britain and Australia until Issigonis' first great meisterwerk the Minor finally replaced it just in time for the Fifties boom in personal motoring Emerging from the Memory Lane side-street I now popped out back into the main hall of the museum. I was now gagging for a cuppa, but it looked like I was now at the far end of the building and figured I might as well check out what was here before heading back to the cafe. Possibly a mistake, but then who could ignore for long the raffish, rakish lines of a Threeandanarf. There's something delightfully caddish and debonair about the shape of the beast... ...that just didn't seem to carry over to the roadsters of the XK 120 and 150, despite them being absolutely contemporaneous to the Mk IV. Cool pedal car is cool! I seem to have blundered into a whole swathe of cars representing the best and beautiful of the British industry here. Later on I realise this entire giant hall is a mix and match of global marques... it just so happens a lot them are British. Ah, them was the days. Perhaps underrated in its own lifetime, it seems that the last, unloved TR is now finding the recognition it probably deserved all along. After all, it was built to sell to Americans, and this meant horrid Federal crash protection which blunted the radical lines. It was also at a time when manufacturers very genuinely believed American safety laws would outlaw the convertible outright, and so the TR-7, which was unarguably much nicer looking with the roof down, gained a coupé bodystyle and that was it. Maybe if it had been scribbled by Gandini rather than Harris Mann the outré wedgey sweep of its body would have been on Athena posters rather than derided in the papers. Add in the awful industrial relations at BL meaning the sporty little soufflé was actually made with dogs' eggs rather than quails', and it was always an uphill struggle. Fortunately, sense was seen and by the time of the TR-8 a decent engine had landed along with the drop-top canvas it needed all along. And equally fortunately, there are preserved specimens such as this to admire and wonder how nice it would've been had the 70s turned out differently ...come to think of it, whatever happened to the wedge? Did it simply leave fashion behind, or is it no longer allowable because it's not a nice enough shape for bucolic pedestrians to get their fool selves run over by? It's not just Great British cars here... or even great British cars. There are some terrible ones, too. And the wedge... well, I'm not really sure if a Lagonda counts. It's sort of like a wedge that's been swallowed by a hippo and stuck in its throat. The later ones - when some of the worst (or most distinctive, if you prefer) styling had been blunted down a bit, the dashboard stood a fighting chance of actually communicating some information to the driver, and the switchgear might even be able to actuate the device it was alleged to control - were probably responsible for saving Aston from the brink, oddly. They sold to rich types and Arab princes where cachet and investment value outweighed good taste, presumably. However, this is an early one, still with the pop-up headlights that would be phased out eventually. It's a definite twenty-footer, too. It looks OK from a distance and in the pics, but up close you can see the rusty patches, paint chips and dodgy bits quite clearly. Some unkind types might say it's all rather dodgy. I say that's maybe a bit harsh. If you think it's awkward-looking now, you should see one with the lights up! Mind you (and I realise that I might be going beyond the limits of acceptability here), I've never been a mad-keen fan of the earlier DB Astons either. I find the sorta hare-lip grille on the DB2 slightly upsetting and prefer the longer rear and Kamm tail of the DB6 to the "archetype" 5 rear end. Maybe I'm just a Philistine. With that said, next to the Lagonda, even a buck-toothed DB2 can't fail to look pretty Past the Grand Tourers of the coachbuilt and high-end manufacturers is a little section of more humble offerings. Little family cars from around the globe are wedged in here. The Imp, for example. Such an innovative design that its strengths and worthiness are still only now really being acknowledged; an Imp owner will tend to be an Imp owner for life. The Californian was a strange idea in many ways. Most of the reliability and construction issues that gave early Imps such a poor reputation had been ironed out by the time this was made, yet the designers chose to give it less headroom and delete the useful opening rear glass "hatch" in favour of making it slightly more stylish. The Quatre Chevaux was the first French car to sell over a million units. It had a good deal of innovation in its construction; monocoque chassis, rear-engine rear-drive making the most of passenger space, relatively light weight, and so on. It had a long production run from the late Forties to the early Sixties. It also weaves a thread through the mid Twentieth Century of deceit, industrial espionage, intrigue, false imprisonment, traitorous collaboration and Governmental shady dealings that would even make Ian Fleming raise a Bond-esque eyebrow of gentlemanly disbelief. La motte de beurre (the Lump of Butter, referring to it's slightly melty shape) was also part of the death warrant for Louis Renault. The design was heavily influenced (some might say stolen) from the embryonic Kraft durch Freude-Wagen, Hitler's Strength Through Joy Car that would become the post-war Beetle. Renault was reported to have instructed his design team to "make me a car like the Germans". He then compounded the felony by keeping his factories open through the War, or as much as the conflict allowed. This he justified on the grounds of wishing to look after the interests of his staff but that wasn't how it was seen after hostilities ceased, especially given that the factories had been seized by the invading Germans and turned to their own war production uses. Accused of collaboration with the Reich, he was imprisoned and, old and sick, died in prison. The fact that this gave the French government a justification to plunder all his assets and take Renault into national ownership was no doubt purely coincidental... maybe if the early 4CV cars had been painted in anything other than desert yellow diverted from Rommel's Afrika Corps vehicles his defence might have been more persuasive. Whatever the sad fate of Louis Renault, the 4CV was brought to general production just after the War by the newly appointed head of the company, former Resistance fighter hero Pierre Lefaucheux. He exploited his influence to ensure Ferdinand and Ferry Porsche were arrested for complicity in war crimes, specifically the use of forced French labour in Volkwagen military derivatives production. As much as anything, this in hindsight seems to have been a pre-emptive strike to avoid accusations that the upcoming 4CV on which so much of Renault's future depended was actually a shameful theft of VW design... something that Lefaucheux furiously and repeatedly denied. Conveniently, the Porsches were unable to raise the vast sum of money demanded to secure both their release, so whilst Ferry was able to return to Germany, there were not sufficient funds to release his father too and Ferdinand was incarcerated for almost two years. By which time the Quatre Chevaux was in the market, and the Allied car manufacturers were still months behind, each rejecting the VW as a flawed design that would never catch on. The 4CV thus hit the ground running, the French people embraced the little quatre pattes ("Four Paws") to their hearts, and it went on to sell 1.2 million. All of which begs one question; where the hell have all of them gone? Honda was already the largest motorcycle manufacturer when it turned to small car production. The N600 was the middle car in a three-car range, and betrayed its bike origins in the tiny, overhead cam twin-cylinder engine. Japanese cars might have been a joke to many, but this was the start of the punchline and it wasn't going to seem so funny a few years later Just past the Japanese answer to the Mini is a room off the main hall, yet another of those little side-rooms that you could easily miss. And within is the British answer to the Mini; the actual Mini! Several different flavours are presented here, including an excellent autopsy display of one that's been cut in half to show off just what an astonishing job Issigonis did of packaging so much into such a small space and at first, it might seem odd to find a Mini Moke hanging from a parachute suspended from the ceiling. But then, this was part of what the Moke was initially envisioned to do. It was intended to be a small, light military taxi that could be dropped into any territory where it was needed. Of course, the front-wheel only drive and tiny wheels meant that it was at quite a disadvantage to more rugged and purpose-built 4x4s and it never really took off as a military workhorse. Its future would be as a beach buggy and leisure runabout... and not in the country of its birth, either. The famous British climate meant that the California lifestyle wasn't really an option for a vehicle with the most token of roofs and no side protection at all. Australia would prove to be the spiritual home of the Moke, and would take over manufacture as well. Back in the main hall one can't help but be arrested by this ridiculous behemoth; Upon reading the information board, it transpires that this is based on the chassis of a Manchester truck, produced between the World Wars by the Overland-Crossley factory in Stockport. Nope, I'd never heard of one either. However, whatever sidevalve old rattler this thing clattered out of the factory propelled by, it's long gone. Instead, some unsung eccentric genius took it upon themselves to modify the chassis in the style of the great Edwardian pioneers of speed record trials and wedge the most prodigious motor they could lay their hands on into a totally inappropriate vehicle. In this instance, it meant a 27-litre V12 Meteor engine from a Centurion tank. It puts its power through a robust Wilson pre-selector gearbox (because double de-clutching something this insane in a pressure situation was presumably something to be avoided) and a specially-manufactured centrifugal clutch rated to 1500 horsepower. That ought to hold, then. It appears that no record exists of anyone being brave enough, or mad enough - or both - to max out the speed on this frankly scary beast. Or if they have, no-one's lived to tell the tale! Just around the corner is a most vibrant little corner of bright citrus British goodness. Lotuses.... errmm. Lotusses? Ahhh, Lotii? Whatever. Specifically, a slightly random selection of an early Elise, a groovy breadvan Europa, a gorgeous the-one-everyone-wants Elan, and a somewhat forgotten and overlooked Elite. All of them are excellent in their own leftfield way, all of them are in a colour that really fails to translate into PhotoBucket's cramped bandwidth very nicely, and all of them far too wedged in to take any very good photos of. Sorry
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 14:17:12 GMT
|
And now I've gone and done it. The Lotiii... ahhh... Lotusians... display lead onto another hall, and ooooh, that looks like a splitscreen 'vette over there... better have a closer look... and what's that over the back on a plinth? Is that a Duesey? And before you know it, I'm moving further away from the sustaining glory of a decent cuppa and into America-land. Gawdayam As it turns out, there are 'Vettes here of almost every flavour and generation. From the Healey-aping swoops of the early models ...to the really rather dull wedgehammer of the C4, the forgotten (and now only affordable) generation of Corvette. But the one that really blows my skirt up is the '63; the first-year coupe of the 2nd Gen model; the first year Sting Ray. The only year of the split rear window. As with most truly daft form-over-function styling mods that were a massive compromise to practicality and were quickly dropped or re-styled, it's now the one everyone wants. Because who buys a Corvette to look behind them anyway, and if you're using it properly everything ought to be behind you! The Stinger rocket-shaped hood mirrors the boat-tail split rear window perfectly, a symmetry that was lost from the later years. The third generation 'Vette (the Stingray as opposed to Sting Ray) had bulked up on the protein shakes and been hitting the gymn big style. This was the point when the car morphed from Chevrolet wanting to move into the European-style light(ish) sportster and admitted that the American Sportscar was really better off as a powerhouse behemoth doorman that could streetdance, rather than a flyweight ballerina who could knife fight. This one is much moar better for having the iconic 'Vette add-on; Thrush sidepipes. Righteous # It's pretty rare to find a Pontiac Bonneville in this country at all. They really don't translate at all well. The wheelbase alone was 124 inches, and the car measured a frankly ludicrous 21 feet nose to tail. The station wagon (on which this one's based) was even longer. When the Americans make a full-size car, they mean full sized! With all this in mind, the car on display probably makes more sense than the normal model; after all, with all that prodigious length going to waste you might as well find a worthwhile use for it and convert it into an ambulance. What the Ghostbusters-style Stay-Puffed Marshmallow Man is all about, I couldn't tell you, mind. Bonus points for spotting your humble scribe in this pic, inadvertently snapping a selfie I've chatted about Edsels in these threads before, and I always take the opportunity to snap them whenever they crop up. It seems the height of hypocrisy now that the Fifties car-buying public rejected them on grounds of the styling being too ostentatious and challenging. Errrmmm... really? At the same time Dodge flagships featured as many lights as a Waltzer and wings you could hang-glide with, the Buick Electra made a sales point of being 225 inches long and Cadillacs boasted the most outrageous rear fins ever seen and grilles made from eight hundred separate components. It seemed grossly unfair to overlook the Edsel on grounds of its slightly awkward-looking "horse's collar" grille, especially when it was toned down hastily in model year updates. And the pricing structure didn't help; no-one was quite sure if they were better than a Ford but worse than a Mercury, or equal to a Mercury and worse than a Lincoln... or where the hell they were supposed to be in regards to non-Ford products at all. Sales were too small, and dropped off alarmingly (on an American scale mind you, which commanded figures any European manufacturer would have been plenty happy with). Whatever the actual cause of its demise, the Edsel marque lasted three brief years so it's always good to see one. I was trying to get a good picture of the cracked and worn paint on the nose of this one when one of the museum staff stopped for a chat. I think these guys might volunteer or something, this old boy didn't seem "all that up" on the cars. He remarked that the chrome made for great pictures, and I tried to explain I was actually taking pics of the patination and he looked at me as if I was a) speaking a different language and b) simple. I briefly thought about going into an explanation of how the craquelure in an Old Master is often thought to add to its character and interest rather than detract from it, but decided a discussion of the fragility of tempera and oil-based paints through time was probably not going to help our relationship much. Yeah, the chrome's great, dude. Lovely Slightly more restrained is this 1964 Impala, despite the fact that the original Impalas were a be-finned and chrome-bedazzling colossus of exactly the kind of extravagance that the Edsels were ostracised for. Ah well, no-one ever said the car-buying public weren't allowed to be fickle. I'm in my element now, straying deep into this trek back into the American years of excess that would be my first home if turbocharged Japanese rockets had never been invented. Regular readers will know all about my perversion towards American grunt, and here we are with a whole massive hall full of it. And what's nice about the choice of vehicles is that not only are there genuine Oh-My-God cars that would thrill and amaze in any setting, but there are relatively more mundane specimens such as "just" a '64 Impala SS, the sort of car people might have actually, y'know... used And once upon a time, the Chevrolet Fleetline was just such a beast. It may look astonishing and outré now, but this is what Mom would do the grocery shopping in once upon a time. And the lowered windshield, fastback aerodynamic shape and modern faired-in wings were not so space-age when placed against a background of concept cars that suggested jet turbines and flying cars were the undeniable way of the future. Beloved of hotrodders for their now-kitsch and retro swoopy curves, it's nice to see cars like this '49 Deluxe survive unmolested and original. It dates from a time when American mascotry had calmed down from the Greco-Roman statuary of the pre-War years and had not yet sprouted the wings and rockets and projectile styling of the jet age. A simple Art Deco prong was considered sufficient Mind you, given that this was the first full model year after the War, this 1947 Aerosedan must have seemed pretty space-age in contrast to what had gone before Was the Ford Woody the 'Murican equivalent of the Morris Traveller? It seems unlikely seeing one in these surroundings with the wood all beautifully varnished and gleaming. In 1937 when this Model 78 Deluxe was pottering to the beach, I guess it would have been the norm and just as everyday as the humble Moggy. Just moar huger enuff In 1949 Oldsmobile introduced the Rocket V8 OHV engine and proceeded to obliterate everything else on the tracks. Back when the li'l old Ford Woody was alternating between taking Dad on his fishing trips and Mom to the hairdressers pre-War, however, the contemporary Oldsmobile of the day "boasted" a very much of the previous generation of engines straight six or eight. Whilst very smooth and refined, with much technical excellence (Oldsmobile used nitrided cylinder bores way back when most other manufacturers still though nitrogen was something you put top pressure on beer barrels with) the engines were showing their age. The greatest innovation on offer was the Automatic Safety Transmission that would offer high and low ratios; the one switching from first, third and fourth gears and the latter between first and second only. While this probably baffled most drivers who gave the matter any thought, most presumably couldn't have been less interested in what was going on in the transmission as long as it meant they didn't have to do all that tedious mucking about moving the gearlever themselves One thing Packards never were was mundane and ordinary. In fact, the attempt to make them so was arguably a large part of what led to their demise. Sales of all top-flight luxury cars were hit badly by the Great Depression in 1930s America, and Packards were no exception. The superb V12 was becoming an anachronism when eight-pots were equally able and much cheaper, and the range was aging fast. The decision to build increasingly cheap and downmarket Packards to meet the market was a bad one, though. They weren't cheap enough to compete with other marques, yet devalued the premium quality image that had pervaded when they were expensive. For a while the discerning and image-conscious car buyer was willing to bask in the reflected kudos that the little red hexagon in the wheel centres bestowed on him, but after a while, when constantly being upstaged by much cheaper and everyman Chevys and Plymouths, the novelty wore off quite quickly. The marque did not survive long after the War, merged into obscurity with other struggling independents. This 1939 120 2+2 is right on the cusp... Packard were no longer the Rolls-Royce of American automobiles but were not quite the limping dog that saw ignominious assimilation by Studebaker in the 1950s In 1957, almost as if to atone for the tragic Edsel fiasco, that most stolid and unadventurous of marques, Ford clearly had a dose of some kind of disco biscuit in the office water cooler. Not only were Edsels allowed to creep out into the public domain, blinking and growling in the unkind glare, but the normally dependable and slightly mundane Fairlane underwent an unexpected and shocking transformation. Never ones to let a good name die, the Brass at Ford dusted off the old Skyliner monicker and attached it to the Fairlane 500. In order to justify this grandiose title, they devised a way of moving the roof from... well, the roof... into the trunk. All it took was six electric motors, four lift jacks, a series of relays, ten solenoids, four locking mechanisms for the roof, and 610 feet of wiring. Simple. It also meant that despite the car measuring a healthy seventeen and a half feet long, it only had luggage space for a spare hanky, pair of undercrackers and a half of JD. It might not have been the first automatically retractable hardtop (that boasting token went to the 1936 Peugeot 402 coupé transformable Éclipse) but it was certainly a first on the New World side of The Pond. Nowadays pretty mundane fare in the catalogue of any marque with even tokenistic pretensions to sportiness, in the late 1950s it was proper Star Trek amazing. And Star Trek wouldn't even be invented for another eight years
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 14:18:26 GMT
|
Oh dear. I've only found another annexe off the main hall here, haven't I? Maybe it was a mistake to go round the back of that Fairlane to take a photo of the back lights. This is the rather grandly-titled Hall of Motorsport. You can tell they're serious because the entrance has a black semi-circular doorway that mimics the tyre-brand bridges at many iconic circuits. Best take a look, then. Funnily enough, this features a few specimens from the world of powered, wheeled competition. But in keeping with the excellent variation in the Museum as a whole they're not all necessarily what you'd expect. Yeah, there's a D-Type (replica) and no-one's ever going to grumble about looking at one of the most successful - and prettiest - racing cars ever to emerge from Britain but it's something of a surprise to see a 1936 Delahaye Type 135 here wedged in besides a modern tupperware Ferrari F360 from the GT Cup. The Delahayes had their own glorious motorsport history by the time the firm was able to buy out compatriots Delage, who added their own expertise from many hard-won races to remind the world that the French motor industry was still very much a force to be reckoned with. This very car was originally owned by no less a legendary figure than Prince Bira of Siam, who won the Twelve Hours of Donington with it in 1937. All but forgotten to the mainstream now, the seismic shifts in French culture away from power and speed would mean the glory days of French racing would not reappear in the Twentieth Century Syndey Allard never gave too many damns about what a car looked like, as long as it was insanely powerful and stupidly fast. The legendary J2 was archetypally the least amount of car necessary to carry around the greatest amount of engine. With the K1, though, you feel at least some attempt was made at making the car look pretty, albeit not in exactly what could be termed a traditional manner. Anyway, this 1947 two-seater is a sort of steroid-enhanced precursor to the Lotus Seven, boasting a Ford V8 sidevalve power unit. It's the only K1 V8 known to remain in roadworthy state, and competed with honours in rallies such as the Alpine back in its prime There's even one of these plastic things, as driven by someone a few people might have heard of This Cosworth engine represents the end of a glorious era of F1 competition; the stupidly powerful turbo cars. It's surprisingly massive outside of the car, with a feeling of solidity and weight about it that you (or I, anyway) wouldn't really expect in a Grand Prix component. But then Ford, specifically Cosworth, knew a thing or two about what it took to make an engine last the course after the DFV became the winningest ever engine in Formula One. The Healey Silverstone is a good deal rarer than other flavours of Healey, but was conceived before Donald managed to secure the manufacturing might and financial backing of Austin in his later cars. The Silverstone was envisaged as the drive-to-a-track-win-drive-home sort of car still in use by the gentleman competitor in the late 1940s. Although hit by the luxury tax being levied by a bankrupt Government trying to pay for the War, it found a ready market in the comparatively affluent United States (export or die, remember?). Healey managed to bring it in under the £1000 sale price that meant a third was paid in tax rather than two thirds but even so sales were hit badly in Britain. Only 105 were sold in total but this at least convinced Healey that such vehicles were still desired and saleable in the tough times after the War. The car itself was built to win with little consideration to luxuries. It was built down to a weight and nothing not strictly necessary was allowed to remain; even the spare wheel was mounted horizontally in the tail and the protruding tyre double-dutied as a bumper. The lights were squeezed in behind the grille in search of better aerodynamics The rear wall of this section boasts loads of period reproductions of advertisements (as do many of the museum's walls, plus old signage and suchlike), including this great piece of exuberant artwork promoting the first ever Motorshow in 1895. Surprisingly little of a car is depicted, maybe because pretty ladies have always sold more or less anything you'd like, and maybe because the organisers didn't want to upset potential customers by showing too much of how primitive, dirty, oily, complicated and generally unpleasant a device the pioneer motor-car actually was. Alphonse Mucha has long been one of my favourite artists of the late Victorian and Art Nouveau periods. Czech-born, for the longest time he earned his corn in France, turning his indulgent and sumptuous curvaceous treatments of the natural form (especially ladies) into promotional backdrops to sell anything from biscuits to fag rolling papers ... and Sarah Bernhardt of course, the Marilyn Monroe of her day. Eventually, tired of relentless commercialism, he returned to his homeland to illustrate the Slavic epic legends he held dear to his heart. It's nice to see that before he did, he managed to illustrate something more dear to my heart than soapflakes, and knocked out this delightful poster advertising the 1902 Paris Auto Salon. Still not much of the actual car is allowed to creep into the picture though, you'll notice. Alors, just look at al those levers on the volant! Poor petit femme Véronique will never be able to surmonter such complexité
....and between the posters is yet another little room with random cars in it. For the life of me, I can't work out the theme here, if there is one, but I'm starting to feel like I'm meandering my way ever-deeper into Narnia and I might never find my way back to the wardrobe. If only I'd heeded Lucy's advice because like all sensible children, she knew that climbing into a wardrobe and closing the door behind you is a very foolish thing to do. Anyway, some randomness; a Riley RMA with a great ornithological mascot...
...A strangely see-through Cossie in a motorsport flava...
... and an early 2CV from the time when they were still ribbed for extra strength and featured more wrinkles than your Gran's stockings.
...and we're back in the room. Specifically the American room. here's something I reckon you'll not have seen before. I certainly hadn't, maybe because it's supposedly the only one of its kind in Europe. The display notes show that even more that this factoid, this Haynes (no relation) Light Twelve is a very interesting car. It was discovered rotting away in a wooden shed in Java, of all places, and is an extremely rare relic from a firm who can lay claim to being America's first ever car manufacturer. Certainly Elwood Haynes of Kokomo Indiana made the first car in America and turned to full production at more or less the same time as the Duryea Brothers, normally considered the first true American marque. Whatever his claim to originality, it is beyond argument that Elwood was an excellent scientist, who developed an alloy called Stellite that is still in use today, most famously in recent times on the Space Shuttle! Dunno about you, I'm a bit fed up with red cars, though
Something else I'd never heard of before is this Moon Model 642 Touring. No disgrace in that; before the Great Depression there were hundreds of tiny-volume manufacturers and Joseph Moon of Ohio seems no different... except for one small point. Having left the family agricultural business and set up in St Louis to make cars in 1905, Mr Moon cleverly appointed a British agent to sell his products; Northwest Motors of Liverpool. This Model 642 was sold new, in England, in 1920. I love the radiator cap mascot; hard to imagine Elf and Safe Tea letting such a pedestrian eviscerator pass type approval in this day and age!
Once upon a time, this alternative-fuel vehicle was considered not the way of the future, as we tend to look at anything nowadays that doesn't feature Otto Cycle internal combustion, but a solid and perfectly acceptable take on the issue of personal transportation.
In fact, it ran on a means of propulsion much more acceptable and mainstream at the time than the newfangled petrol engines those ce-razee Germans were foisting on the world. After all, steam engines had powered the railways, driven the Industrial Revolution and run the mines for a considerable time already. Missionary Father Verbiest had designed the first self-propelled steam-powered transport back in 1670 in China so it was hardly a new thing by the turn of the Twentieth Century. Back in the pioneer days of motoring, no-one knew which method of self-powered driving would prove enduring, rather like all those people who bought Betamax had no idea they would be the laughing stock of eBay within a few short years. At the turn of the Twentieth Century, no real distinction was made between steam, electric or petrol power; no-one was going to bet which would survive, or indeed if all would. Even one of the most respected automotive engineers of all time, Ferdinand Porsche's first attempts at car production were the electric-powered Löhner machines.
Even after petrol had shown it probably had the trump hand after the First World War, steam-powered vehicles continued to feature and such superbly-engineered examples as this 1920s Stanley Steamer were if anything more reliable than many petrol-powered equivalents with their oil-fired boilers doing away with the need for coal bunkers. Where the gasoline engine really started to score was in the ease of use. There was no need to fire a boiler to make steam half an hour before you actually wanted to drive anywhere, the gallons of water a steamer required were not ballasting down a petrol car's performance, and the passengers were not being scared off by the need to sit on top of a potential bomb of a boiler running at several bar of pressure. The adoption of electric starters by Cadillac on petrol-engined cars from 1912 onwards was really the death knell for alternative fuels. Regardless, forward-thinking firms like Stanley strove to keep their cars attractive to the average Joe. It's only when you look under the bonnet that you realise its engine still ran on fire and steam rather than exploding oil fractions. Even the steam condenser was styled like a normal car radiator so as to blend into the scenery of the day. Eventually, progress would kill and eat all these evolutionary dead end dinosaurs, more through convenience and greater useful range than any true deficiencies of steam power. And as for electrics, well, that's a whole other story that's still being written.
Just as I was starting to lament the lack of "proper" American cars in this section; i.e. muscle cars, or course, I find an area sort of sectioned off behind a set of pillars. Ooh, it claims to be the supercar gallery. Now we're talking. And somewhat incongruously, here are some proper muscle cars. A Charger ('69 though, a year too late to be ideal), an el Camino (several years too late). Hang on though, what's this? Ahh, a '67 Camaro. Now, that's more like it. An SS, too, and even better, she's got the RS package with the headlight doors and dress stripes. Just about perfect. Looks stunning in white.
And by contrast, a '78 Camaro. Yeah, so it's a Z28 but I've never been a massive fan of second generation Camaros, and the latter years of the 70s were kind of a nadir for almost all cars. The colour is... well, I don't really know what it is. It isn't really yellow, it's not exactly cream. It's kind of... hmmmm. It's the American equivalent of British Leyland NHS Hearing Aid Beige. Not nice. It only seems to be here to prove what a nice shape the earlier generation was in contrast
speaking of unusual colours... but in a good way... how about this GT40? You wouldn't have thought deep pearl blue with dusky lilac pink stripes would be a winning colourscheme if someone were to describe it to you, but here with the spotlights drawing out liquid smooth highlights and the sensual curves merging into the shadows, it looks positively voluptuous. I like the idea of a car that was only ever built to be a weapon rocking a showcar-quality paintjob
Separated at birth is the car next door, the spiritual twin to the GT40. Bereft of the motorsport icon status of the Ford, the Pantera is nonetheless cut from the same cloth. A beefy Ford V8 in an arrestingly pretty box, they both fall into the same category as the Allard we looked at earlier; how little car can I get away with for the greatest amount of engine? A car that's stayed with me in my heart from the first time I was even aware of cars. I had the Matchbox one proudly ranked alongside other defining miniatures of my youth; the Monterverdi Hai, the Pininfarina Modulo, the Mazda RX500. Even after proof was made positive that the Pantera really wasn't all that great a car in many ways, De Tomaso continued to make them waayyyy past their sell-by date because they realised, like many discerning owners, that just because it couldn't outperform a Ferrari on the track or out-Top-Trump a Countach, it didn't mean it was an irrelevance. Far from it, if ever a car was more than the sum of its parts, if ever one managed to tap into the visceral, animal urges that make you go WOW when you see it.. hear it... smell it... this is the one.
Oh, speak of the devil... here's a Countach. Y'know what, I really don't think I need to write anything else here
The Mercedes SL 190 was a pauper's machine. Well, relatively... Designed as an affordable version of the iconic 300 SL Gullwing, no-one even then would have gone so far as to actually describe it as "cheap". What it did was take the astonishing styling of the Gullwing and place it on a modified saloon underpinning, thus avoiding the cost of making the fearsomely complex and expensive 300 birdcage chassis. The motor was a (admittedly new) four-pot rather than bigger sister's inline six, and ran off twin Solex carbs rather than space-age injection. It was still blighted by the Gullwing's wayward swing rear axles though, even if the front were independent double wishbones. This was probably the start of Mercedes-Benz beginning to make cars to be seen in and that were perfectly capable (perhaps more able than many contemporaries) but without the zealous, almost obsessive drive towards excellence in every aspect that had led the marque to dominate the tracks and rallies of the world for so long. And you'd have to say, she is easy to look at
In strict contrast, the Jaguar XKSS is not only heart-stoppingly gorgeous, but is the real deal, the genuine article. No watered-down racer-for-the-more-sedentary-gentleman styling exercise this. In 1956 Jaguar made the decision to withdraw the factory racing team from competition; after all, they'd just won Le Mans twice in succession with the D-Type (and were about to monster it again in 1957 when D-Types took five of the top six places). There were plenty of unused D-Type components lying around Browns Lane, however, and the decision was made to offer them as a limited run of road cars. Thus was born the XKSS. Twenty five cars only were built, and were genuinely a road-going Le Mans racer. The changes were minimal; a windscreen was fixed to replace the separate screens, the aerodynamic fin was removed from the rear deck, and the divider between driving and passenger seats. Oh, and in a nod to usability, a passenger door was added! The most token of folding fabric roofs was nailed on, and that was it. Jaguar realised that winning the premier road race in the world three years running couldn't hurt in terms of saleability, and indeed it wasn't hard to find buyers for the XKSS. This was made even easier by the fact that a fire at the factory destroyed nine of the finished cars, so only sixteen ever made it out into the world. To me, this is easily the most beautiful of all Jaguars. Steve McQueen had one (in BRG, of course) and that's good enough endorsement for me. Given the rarity and stupendous price they command, I'm guessing this one might well be a replica, but I just don't care. It's so lovely, I find it hard to stop licking the monitor
This is a Ferrari. A 250GT of some kind. I'd love to tell you which exact flavour, but as is normal with Ferrari's infuriatingly bewildering and obfuscatory "naming" strategy, it could be anything. I know the 250 refers to the displacement of a single cylinder and because the factory used that rubric on twelve-pots, that makes it the 3-litre Colombo engine. But then add in the bewildering number of model designations dropped on two different lengths of chassis by various coachbuilders and altered slightly by customer order or the whim of the Boss... well, it's a 250GT. Spyder. Pinifarina. More than that, work it out your damned self, I've already lost too many hours of my life staring at pages of Google Images trying to fluke the one photo that resembles the car in question the most.
And this is a Bentley Fourandanarf. I'm not sure I'd strictly agree with the display notes that this represents the first ever true supercar. That accolade is almost always given to the Lamborghini Miura as being the first road car to really go the extra mile in both looks and performance beyond not only what was required but what was sensible. I kinda see where the museum are coming from; the Bentleys of the late Twenties were winners on the track, excessive on the road, looked phenomenal and cost the same as a terraced street in the suburbs but were they really a Supercar as we think of it now? I guess this discussion could run and run, but if you allow the Bentley, then why not the equivalent Bugatti, or Delage, or Invicta, or Darraq, or Benz, Alfa, Itala, Hispano-Suiza... where will it end? Discuss, lol
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 14:19:48 GMT
|
A staircase leads up from the supercar gallery to a mezzanine level stuffed with bikes. And I mean stuffed. Why do museums always do this with two-wheeled vehicles? Just cos they're smaller doesn't mean they need to be wedged in that much closer together than the cars! Honestly, they're all the same; Beaulieu and Brooklands are even worse offenders if anything. Anyway, one side of this World of Bikes section is dedicated to speedway machines (rather oddly... but I guess even a sport that's almost as traveller as banger racing needs commemorating somewhere) and they really don't speak to me. The other side, mind, has some real gems. Most of which I can't get a picture of clearly. Some are easier; The Brough Superiors were considered the Rolls-Royce of motorcycles, although Geo Brough himself was more a canny assembler than an innovative designer. His great strength lay in buying in the absolute best of components and sticking them together until he had a bike. Thus the "model range" was constantly changing and there was great variance in the bikes. The most famous customer was probably T.E. Lawrence (of Arabia) who had eight of them named George the First to the Eighth. One regnal number too far, he also died on one. Cheery. The Russian Dniepr/Ural/Cossack/Irbit bike might have had more brand names than most, but that's mostly because it's been around such a long time without seeing the need to change anything other than the name. The Germans made quite an impression on Russia during the War (to say the least) in many ways, one of which was their choice of transport. The BMW and Zundapp opposed-twin 750cc motorbikes were a mainstay of the Wehrmacht, and used for everything from troop taxis to light artillery haulers to mobile machine-gun nests. Part of their versatility came from their great robustness; no matter what was thrown at them, they kept on going. And this was exactly what was needed for the terrible road conditions in much of Russia. In fact, even before hostilities broke out, the bikes were already being manufactured in Russia. The Red Army needed cheap reliable transport and no-one was fooled by the Molotov-von Ribbentrop Pact that claimed the Reich and Soviet Union were going to remain best buddies. Having seen how effective the BMWs were as part of the Blitzkreig and invasion of Poland, the Ural factory purchased five motorcycles in neutral Sweden, smuggled them into the Soviet Union, and reverse-engineered every component. They then built a factory to make them anew, hidden safely out of reach behind the Ural mountains. The bikes have been made there ever since, almost unchanged and still perfect for the Russian roads, since 1939, surely one of the longest production runs of any mechanical device At last! I knew if I looked hard enough, I'd find a rotary-engined vehicle! Not a Mazda, nor an NSU nor even a Citroën, but something rather more unusual Remember how we were chatting about how steam power could easily have ruled the world? Well, German firm DKW started out in just that arena; Dampf Kraft Wagen stood for "Steam Powered Vehicle", which is exactly what they specialised in originally. However, Danish engineer Jørgen Skafte Rasmussen, who founded the factory in Zschopau to make steam fittings and vehicles, made a tiny two-stroke petrol engine he originally envisaged as a toy in 1919. Indeed, the fact he called it Des Knaben Wunsch (The Boy's Desire) implied he thought it only a fun distraction. But soon the cogs were turning and a modified version of the engine appeared in DKW's first motorcycle soon after. Humbly named Das Kleine Wunder (The Little Marvel), it was the beginning of the firm's life as a manufacturer of "proper" vehicles and by 1930 the firm was the world's largest motorcycle producer. Merged into the Auto Union with fellow marques Audi, Horsch and Wanderer, DKW turned their efforts to the War effort with some success, but after the War never reclaimed their massive status and output, much of which was due to the Iron Curtain separating the company headquarters from its manufacturing base. However, in 1973 almost out of nowhere they began offering the W2000 motorcycle for sale. Powered by a Fitchel And Sachs snowmobile Wankel rotary engine, it was one of few rotary vehicles ever brought to market-ready status. Let down by poor resources and inadequate air-cooling in addition to the "normal" rotary shortcomings such as poor fuel economy and heavy oil usage, the bike was probably doomed to fail but it was a brave effort. I wish I could have got a decent photo of it; they're a seriously rare thing nowadays. OK, that's enough bike stuff. I can tell your eyes are glazing over, and I couldn't get enough good photos to make it worthwhile anyway. Right, I've had enough now, I'm off for a coffee. Down the stairs, turn left and nothing's going to stop me making it to the cafe and some reviving bean-squeezings. I make it about five yards before I have to stop and have yet another OMG moment before another vehicular legend. Despite rocking a weird manatee-shaped blobby mascot that would later find a home on that most humble of cars the V8 Pilot, the Lincoln Zephyr was very much some kind of pinnacle when it was new. Despite costing a vast sum of money (for a Ford) at £550 in Britain, this wasn't the thing that stood out about it the most. The foundation of the new upmarket Lincoln sub-brand in 1936, it sold to the gentlemanly characters of the jazz age who recognised quality... and because it wasn't blighted by a cheapening Ford badge, could happily indulge in its pure Art Deco extravagance and smoooooooth V12 powerplant. Because anyone could have a vulgar, proletarian V8. Tom Tjaarda's superb styling, based on knowledge of aerodynamics gained from aeroplane design, was the first time streamlining had really broken through in the American marketplace. The slightly-less aerodynamic Chrysler Airflow had already failed to win hearts and minds. The effortless power from the engine meant it could waft along at 70mph all day long, but the chassis beneath compromised the pleasure somewhat; early Zephyrs are often cited as having genuinely scary vagueness of steering. In addition, the chassis still featured Ford's long-outdated transverse springs front and rear with a dead front axle and torque-tube rear. It wasn't long before the V12 would be seen as an irrelevance as the cheaper, lighter and simpler V8s caught up on power and this 1938 Zephyr was nearly the last of the line. Discontinued in 1940, they would not be seen after the War. Five minutes later, and stoically avoiding all the distraction en route, I'm sat in the cafe reviving myself with an Americano ("would you like milk with that?" Why do they always ask that? No, I'd like my black coffee black, thanks), flicking through the nicely-printed, quality feeling guidebook. And finding loads of stuff that I've missed. A Chaika! How the hell did I miss something that huge? Damn, I'm going to have to go in again. By now it's past lunchtime and there are several people hanging around who might well be RRers... they look disreputable enough. There doesn't seem to be anyone to meet and greet though, and I'm a bit first-day-at-school shy to just wander up and start talking at people as if they've been forum buddies for years. In case they're just random punters and think I'm an escaped lunatic. But there must be some retro cars in the car park by now. I figure this is the perfect time to nip out for a fag or two and see what's what. This would have worked better had I not lost my lighter somewhere in the museum and the cigarette lighter on the Rex been dodgy. Ah well, that old fall-back for meeting people; got a light, mate? Turns out in this post smoking ban world us social lepers are about as likely to find another pariah with a light as a camel is to get a pass for the London Eye. Eventually I find a helpful fella who's got a lighter in his GT-Four. He doesn't smoke though. And he's a car photographer. But he hates taking his camera when he's not working. And he's here for the Retro Rides meet. But he's not on the forum. Weird. Internet people are weird in real life... However, there are some cool, Retro, unusual and just generally groovy things to look at in the carpark amongst the more mundane one-box running shoe-styled modern fare. A GT-Four, for example Nice though the Celica is, I have to say that I'm more wowed by the panda Trueno next door. Initial D perfection This is even worse though; there are plenty of people milling about, and loads of decent cars, but it seems from my recent poll of one of one, not everyone thus described is here for the RR meet. maybe we ought to think about a dedicated parking bit for next time. There's a superb Cavalier next to my Rex now, but no sign of the owner. I remember blagging lifts to college in one of these when a mate's mum got one and I must confess back then I never thought it would seem a cool survivor car one day This blown Amazon is just superb, and I'm sure it belongs to an RRer but it shoots off before the award ceremony thing is supposed to start, so maybe not. I'm certain I saw it at a Gathering (perhaps more than one) but I suppose that doesn't mean anything. In fact, a lot of the cars I felt sure would be something to do with the meet are gone by the time I come back from mopping up the cars I missed in the museum The caged-up, immaculate racey Chamois is another. Nice to see an obviously competition-biased car finished to such a high standard. There's that natty little Fiesta I passed on the way down here. As I later find out, it belongs to no less a luminary than RMad. Or RMad's father in law. Or his father in law's dog. Or something, I might have lost the thread during the explanation a bit. Does sit well. This is the sort of car that if it were in classic car bore circles would be described as "honest unrestored condition" and all the better for it. There's also a later model Fiesta that seems to have suffered some kind of mishap... at least, I'm guessing it doesn't usually run with a rear window made from a tarpaulin! Must be a bit draughty at speed. Excellent engine work, with a load of bike carbs stuffed under the bonnet One of my pet hates in carstuff is the VAG modifying world; I've never quite got how people want to modify their cars to all look the same. More than most car subcultures it seems that the "rules" dictate a very narrow band of what's acceptable to do to your car. Y'know... shaved, stupidly low, small multi-spoke wheels, wire tuck, etc. It's all very well, and often the cars are amazing works of dedication, but surely the whole point of modding is to express your personality and desire to stand out from the crowd? With that in mind, it's nice to see something like this Jetta that has clearly gone its own way. You can tell from quite a distance based if nothing else on the copious extent of wheelage under the arches. Have to say, I'm less keen on the brush-finish paint though And this is just perfect. My ideal F*rd, favourite model mark, quad lights, vinyl roof, everything. If you wanted to be pedantic you could argue it could do with fewer doors, but the 'Tina is probably the car that disguises moredoor status better than just about any other. Much want Funny really that Haaaaahnda's ethos was so entrenched in building bikes and zany micro-engineering just for the sake of it that even when they moved into making cars, they were still... well, making bikes. The CRX is essentially a four-wheeled Honda motorcycle. With a roof. Daftly revvy, super lightweight, nimble handling... it gives the impression even at slow speed that everything it does relies on zillions of tiny micrometrically precise components all whizzing about at speeds most normal manufacturers wouldn't attempt outside of a dream. And bearing in mind that the original export model was a 1.3 litre, would return over 50mpg combined cycle and still happily do over 100mph... in 1983!... for a price that was comparable to a new fridge-freezer to most 'Muricans, it was quite an astonishing thing really. In typical Honda inscrutability, no-one seems quite sure exactly what CRX was actually meant to stand for, my favourite explanation being "Civic Renaissance Model X" simply because it's so meaningless it must be true Saabs. Apparently no longer the sole prerogative of geography teachers and eco-aware mung-bean abusing doctors. Might have mixed my metaphors there a bit. I love the Chevy-style poverty spec steelies with dog dishes. Almost as weird-yet-right a look as actual Saab Inca alloys I know this was Monza Phil's because... well, it's a Monza and it was driven by a bloke called Phil. If only all internetz names were so straightforward. Only one working light on the thing, but in its defence, it was pulled unwillingly from winter slumber just that very day And this wee beastie is pretty unmistakeable; the recently magazine-featured (and rightly so) Bognor Mobile. I've never really thought of myself as a car snob particularly, but there was certainly a point in the not-too-distant past where if you'd told me I'd be singing the praises of a Nissan Micra as a base for modifying... or even uttering grudging admiration for one... I'd have told you to lay off the blue Smarties and have a word with yourself. But I have shrugged off the concrete overcoat of prejudice and unashamedly heap praise on the little K11. I dunno whether it's just the vision and originality that Mark has brought to it but it's certainly made me take a look at myself and how I ought to be less judgemental of stuff. A well-modified car is a well-modified car, and there are many six-figure motors that are horrendous taste bypasses proving money is most emphatically not everything. On the other hand, there are budget dailies like the Micra that hang together so right that it's difficult to argue it should be any different. So there. Pretty sure this was just a random cool car and nothing to do with the RR meeting, but I snapped it anyway because it was my first spot of a new Mustang out in the wild. I was pretty wowed by it, to be fair. The front end might be a little bit more Basking than Mako shark, but it's wide-mouthed krill-feeder face still maintains enough of a demeanour of aggression and purpose to look cool. The rear end, not so much. A very disappointing and plasticky posterior that left me feeling rather let down... sort of like perving at that girl's pert rump as she sashays along the street, only to get in front of her and find to your horror she looks like she's had a tragic head-swap operation with an Egyptian mummy This little 356 was lovely. A tiny bit humpty-back from behind, but adorable from the front. Being parked nest to some anonymous bloated modern just served to emphasise the petite curvaceousness.
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 14:20:39 GMT
|
Right, so I've checked out the car park, I've had me fag (and I can't have another even if I wanted to cos the guy with the lighter and the GT-Four has sodded off) so it's probably about time to head back inside. The time has ticked by, I've only had one coffee, the RR ceremony thing is due soon... and the guide book insists that there's this Chaika lurking in there somewhere and that needs to be photographed. Oh yeah... ...how the hell did I miss that, then? Another car I knew nothing about what it actually looked like the first time I "saw" one. Just like the Armstrong Siddeley that was soooooo unlike how I'd imagined it, the Chaika first entered my foggy awareness via the medium of Martin Cruz Smith's sequel to the superb Gorky Park (also one of the best films ever, despite the plot diverging massively from the novel. And the rather preposterous sight of Ricky Fulton as a KGB honcho). Polar Star was the equally superb sequel, and one of the large, bucolic Russian ladies that shared the factory ship with an unfortunate Renko was nicknamed "the Chaika" because of her resemblance to the huge "square-shouldered" limousine beloved of high-ranking KGB officials. My mind conjured up a vehicle as linear and foreboding as the bleak Soviet architecture of a million Cold War era tenement blocks. In fact, the original GAZ (Gorkovsky Avtomobilny Zavod) M13 Chaika limousine was a plagiarisation of the mid-1950s Packard Patrician, and a sculptural be-chromed extravagance much at odds with the grimness of the times. It would appear given how frosty relationships were between America and the USSR in 1958 when the Chaika emerged from the Nizhny Novgorod factory, the Russian firm felt pretty secure from the threat of lawsuits for design theft. Chaikas (meaning "Gull" and named for the ornate fretwork shapes of the grille metal) were a rare item of luxury and even rarer piece of conspicuous status allowed in the Communist state. And "allowed" is the correct word rather than "available" because they weren't... well, only to senior Party figureheads and the aforementioned KGB top rankers. Ordinary citizens could get a glimpse of how those who were their equals... only slightly more equal in the best Orwellian idiom... got about because they were allowed to hire Chaikas from the State as wedding cars for their most special day. They fact that such rental was well beyond the means of most Soviet workers is neither here nor there. So did I get it wrong again, in that pre-Google age when I first read that mysterious Russian word naming an even more mysterious car? Not exactly. The superbly at-odds M13 was superseded by the M14 Chaika from 1977 onwards, and that resembled the worst kind of ruler-straight style-vacuum American sedan of the era.. think of something utterly wretched like a stretched Cadillac Cimarron and you're kinda there. The M14 was a car so horrible that it was probably for the best when Gorbachev symbolically had all the tooling and blueprints destroyed as part of perestroika in a gesture of tearing down the inequality of privilege that had perverted the original egalitarian ideal of communism. So I guess that Renko's accomplice was probably named after the more modern (and hateful) Chaika. Poor girl. While we're talking about cars copied shamelessly from other cars, the ultimate would have to be the Hindustan Ambassador. Based on the series III Morris Oxford of 1956, the Ambassador almost unbelievably only went out of production in 2014, a production run that even rivals the VW Beetle and makes all other cars look like ephemeral bits of fluff. Kolkata's emission standards regulation in 2011 essentially sealed the fate of the "Amby" which had remained more or less unchanged throughout its lifespan. As it was thereafter technically illegal to sell one for use as a taxi (it's most usual purpose) the car only lasted another three years before succumbing to the inevitable after a mere 58 years, the same as the production Beetle. The one in the Haynes museum is furnished in a wonderfully Bollywood style To find the Chaika, I'd wandered into the section of the museum I'd bypassed whilst doing my elaborate loop through the backroom annexes. Damn that guide book, I could have lived in ignorance! Now I've found there's a whole load of stuff that it definitely would be a shame to have missed out on. And some of it is surprisingly humble. But rare. After all, when was the last time you saw a DAF out in the wild? Dutch automakers are almost as rare as Swiss ones and mostly DAF loved trucks, so cars like the little 44 weren't exactly common even in their 1970s "heyday". Or maybe that had something to do with the tiny 750cc twin cylinder engine that even with the innovative continuously variable transmission, struggled to get out of it's own way. This '71 car is awesome for also being in that gorgeous shade of Seventies Brown. Everything was brown in the 70s In fact, this whole section has some groovy motors from around the world. Here's another Delahaye from that French France, and possibly more in keeping with the image of the firm that most would have. They were successful racers, yeah, albeit much more so with the input of the Delage expertise, but mostly what they were best at was building exotically sculpted automotive objets d'art. Like this 1939 135M with its definitive "fencer's mask" grille. The original 135 was unofficially named Coupe des Alpes after it proved efficient in rally racing, especially the Alpine. The later 135M update re-started production after the War and continued to be offered in one form or another until Delahaye's demise. The 135S we saw earlier was derived from the same source as this later tourer-bodied car, and proved that its truck-derived engine was no bar to competing with honours. Of course, even after the demise of Delahaye there were French firms to continue the job of bonkers innovation and extravagant styling. Glass bumpers? Hell, why not? The Citroën SM really deserved more recognition in its lifetime.. and a longer lifetime, come to think of it. Sad that Joni Mitchell should be proved right time and time again. You don't know what you've got ‘til it's gone It's not as though André's boys were newcomers to the concept of shaking up the established order. The world collectively scratched its head at the zany Traction Avant in 1934. With the exception of oddities like Cord's front-drive 812, few cars were front-wheel drive and the only other volume production had come from DKW (remember them?) from 1930. So people mocked and asserted the FWD phenomena would never catch on, and 780 000 TAs later Citroën could safely laugh back. Of course, most cars now are FWD and have been for decades, but very few look as stylish and louche as a TA Fred Lanchester would no doubt have been outraged by the appearance of this frisky minx mascot on the radiator cowl of this 1929 Lanchester 30hp. He might have left the firm that bore his name long before this, but as the man who lays claim to building the first true English automobile and a purist engineer, he despised frippery and unnecessary adornments. He'd designed the very company badge to be as austere, symmetrical and clean as possible so popping a wheel-riding flapper on top would certainly have had him grinding his teeth with pique If ever there was a car to not commemorate, honour or indeed celebrate in any way the British car industry, then surely it must be this little Rover 8. Or is it? Yes, there were plenty of deficiencies throughout the car's design; the original engine was a truly feeble single cylinder of a hardly stump-pulling 8hp; there was a trip up the blind alley of Daimler-Knight sleeve valves; the body was mounted to the underpinnings by only three points and would move alarmingly independent from the chassis... BUT! there's always a but. In this case, several. The case for the defence would point out several salient strengths; it was the first production Rover and therefore is worthy of honouring; it had an innovative backbone chassis structure formed from the engine, gearbox, prop shaft and rear axle (something Colin Chapman would be lauded for several decades later); it had a unique method of switching the cams to reduce valve lift and thus increase engine braking for descents. Admittedly by the time of this 1922 model the second generation Rover 8 had a conventional chassis and a twin-cylinder engine, but it still innovated, being suspended on unusual quarter-elliptic cantilever springs at all four corners and had even improved engine lubrication from the original splash method to pressure. The "radiator" was a dummy simply for aesthetics, and a popular folk tale of the day was that you could recognise a Rover 8 in the dark by the glow of its super-hot heads through the "radiator". But it was cheap as the proverbial deep-fried potato product, would perpetrate over 40mph if the pilot were brave enough, return over 40mpg and run all day and night with minimal maintenance (there wasn't much to maintain!). The car had a 19 year production lifespan, sold 18 000 units and provided Rover with a grounding to go on and become one of Britain's great marques. So try not to mock it's awkward, upright, brown Noddy car looks. This as much as any coachbuilt grand tourer or race-winning sportscar truly represents the best of British! From the wee brown Rover I return to the American annexe. There are a few cars in here that I want to make sure I've properly documented. There are some cars in here that are truly world-beating. There are some that I've never seen before and will likely never see again. But before I can get to them, I stumble across a Plymouth Prowler I'd completely missed before. I love these things. I know they attract a lot of derision, but I've never quite understood why. They represent the resurrection of the American performance car, for a start. For decades lost in the wilderness when the only performance options were Corvettes, IROC Camaros and wretched Firebirds... or even *shudder* that most hatefully beige of cars, the Fox-body Mustang... Chrysler suddenly went bonkers and thrust the Viper out, blinking hooded slit eyes into the sunlight. Hot on the heels of that now-iconic venomous reptile came the concept-car-made-flesh of the Plymouth (later Chrysler) Prowler. And honestly, what's not to like? Coming from a design by Chip Foose (his mom calls him "Douglas") for the excellent Hemisfear hotrod, the Prowler somehow managed to squeeze through regulations and make production remarkably unchanged. Albeit with a v6 engine rather than anything Hemi in origin, it was still a breath of fresh air in the awful style vacuum of the early 1990s and more importantly, opened the door to a host of funky re-boots of old muscle cars and performance identities.
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 14:22:17 GMT
|
And now we're down to it. As regular readers will know, my old Granny always told me to end on a song. But the song currently in my head is Arnold Layne and I don't really want people's overriding memory of this thread to be a ditty about a cross-dressing knicker thief. So I'll have to go to Granny's Second Law, which is to always end on a high. So here goes, 'cos we're nearly at the end... Here we have a quartet of some of the most awe-inspiring cars ever to come out of the land of the Motorcar As A Means Of Inspiring Awe. Arguably, in their own way all four are white elephants, or maybe more accurately, apex predators that were so vicious they destroyed the environment's ability to support them through their own excess. Maybe that's a lot of what makes them so amazing; as Dr Eldon Tyrell said "the light that burns twice as bright burns half as long". In the mid 1930s, some cars burned brighter than the sun, oh so briefly. To launch a car like Auburn's 851 Speedster during the bleakest economic time in modern history was never going to be anything but corporate suicide. This didn't seem to bother Errett Loban Cord, then owner of the long-standing Indiana firm. The car cost more than a house... more than several houses in fact... and that was before you took the chassis to your favourite coachbuilder to actually have a body put on it! The company lost money on every car it sold, and they didn't sell many, and coupled with Cord's failed and highly dodgy attempts at stock manipulation, killed the company. But they left a legacy of one of the most outright beautiful man-made objects in the gorgeous art deco curves and lines of the Speedster... and besides, Cord had other strings to his bow... ...such as the second section of his Unholy Triumvirate of marques, and the one that wore his own name; The Cord 810 and 812 models were made by the Cord Automobile Company... which was misleading as it was actually a part of Auburn, which Cord of course owned. Auburn couldn't cope with their own manufacturing, and couldn't sell the cars they did make, so for E.L. to divert resources to flattering his ego with the 810 seems in hindsight the height of lunacy. But Cord was a salesman before anything else and his cast-iron self-confidence reassured him that he could sell anything to anyone; even a stellar-priced car in the depths of Depression. He couldn't of course, and Cord (the company) died along with Auburn. But the legacy of the 810 is as humbling as the Speedster. Not only did Gordon Buehrig excel himself again with another stunning design, but the car brought genuine innovation in engineering that the Speedster didn't. The Lycoming (another of Cord's companies) engine was mounted behind the gearbox, which sat out front to make America's first front-wheel drive car (and the last until the oddity of Oldsmobile's Toronado finally convinced John Doe, Main Street, USA that there was another way). It had independent front suspension at a time when even most racing cars didn't! The coffin-nosed styling also boasted the world's first pop-up headlights, albeit operated by hand via a crank under the dash. The later 812 model added a supercharger, and the external boast was made plain by the adoption of Mercedes-style external flexible exhausts exiting the hood side. And then there was the third, and greatest of Cord's unholy three. Not just his greatest, but unarguably one of the best motor cars of any period, any style, any where. When Cord purchased Duesenberg in 1926 he got an already-forged reputation for engineering excellence, racing prowess and stylistic genius. E.L. Cord being who he was though wasn't content to rest on this pre-stamped image. He promptly challenged Fred Duesenberg to build the best car in the world; biggest, fastest... most expensive. The European Old Guard such as Rolls-Royce, Hispano Suiza and Mercedes must all be swept away by the new American Ultimate. And thus the Model J debuted at the New York Car Show of 1928... but with typical Cord hubris, the official launch of the car was made at the Salon de l'automobile de Paris in 1929; right in the backyard of the established order. The Model J was relatively workmanlike underneath; the chassis brought nothing new to the automotive world, but did what it did superbly, as befitted an engineer of Duesenberg's prowess. Arguably, it would have been better still have his brother August ("Augie") not been squeezed out by a personality clash with Cord. Augie continued to run the Duesenberg race enterprise (with great success) but as a totally separate enterprise from the road car firm. It was only when Fred tragically died young, in 1932, of pneumonia following complications from injuries sustained in a road accident whilst driving a Model J, that Cord had no choice but to thaw out his relationship with Augie and bring him back in-house. So the chassis might have been better, but it was good enough. The engine was the straight-eight Lycoming monster moving around 420 cubic inches of fuel and air (7 litres) and plopping out around 265 horsepower as a result. Which was a lot for the day. But then, everything about the Model J was excessive. The top speed was over 110 mph; most contemporaries would struggle to reach 100, let alone break it. The later supercharged Model "S"J would achieve 135mph. The chassis and running gear was impressive enough then, but they were also clothed by some of the most prestigious coachbuilders of the time on both sides of the Pond. In Europe such luminaries as Saoutchik, Fernandez et Darrin, Gurney Nutting and Franay and in America Derham, Holbrook, Judkins, Le Baron, Murphy, Rollston and so on would put bodies onto the J. In addition, the Beuhrig-penned "official" Duesenberg body called "La Grande" could be specified at dealers in New York City, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Florida, Denver and Chicago. Not unsurprisingly, this acme of motoring was well beyond the reach of all but the most well-heeled (and glamorous). At a time when an American medical doctor (that linch-pin of middle-class respectability) earned under $3,000 per annum, the chassis alone of a Model J cost $8,500... and rose to $9,500 after 1932! The cost of a finished, bodied car was between $13 000 and $19 000. Ouch. The cars quickly became the preserve of status symbols and the obscenely wealthy... and became a status symbol in their own right. Everyone who was anyone wanted to be associated with the reflected glory of a Model J; Greta Garbo, Mae West, Howard Hughes, Clark Gable (he had more than one!), the Wrigley and Mars families, car-mad King Alfonso XIII of Spain (who already had a Hispano-Suiza named in his honour), King Victor Emanuel III of Italy, Prince Nicholas of Romania, Queen Maria of Yugoslavia. Oh, and Al Capone of course. James Cagney couldn't afford one but procured one for a photoshoot to imply that he could They were not perfect, however. The gearboxes were a famous weak spot; unable to cope with the power and upgraded several times, they never gained synchromesh thus making town driving a potential chore. Fortunately, most of the cars could exceed 90mph in second, so the unpleasantness of stirring the cogs was kept to a minimum. By the end of production the chassis and gearbox were considered positively antediluvian; the rest of the car industry had caught up whilst the Duesey had stood still. In addition, the lightest of cars were well over two tons... and some were as heavy as three tons... so the driving experience was more of a wrestling match than many of the glamorous and good were willing to put up with. The outrageous cost was so far outside the scope of the austerity in the Depression, the firm could not even come close to building (or selling) it's break-even target of 500 cars per year, and coupled with the collapse of Cord's over-extended business empire, spelled the end for this most astounding of vehicles. Duesenberg went to the graveyard with Auburn and Cord in 1937. 481 cars were built in total and around 370 survive. At one point, at the depths of its unpopularity due to irrelevance and out-datedness in the 1950s, a decent Model J could be bought for as little as $200... Nowadays that'd be more like $5 million. They are once again recognised as the exceptional item they always were. They leave something of a mark even on everyday language. The phrase "It's a doozy" is alleged to have stemmed from the status of the Model J as the ultimate expression of taste, luxury and excellence. In all likelihood, the saying existed before the car (there are etymological traces of it back to the start of the Twentieth Century, before Duesenberg were manufacturing). It would appear that a perfectly applicable pre-existing thing was hi-jacked by Cord's empire and turned to his own uses. If ever there was a metaphor for the man himself... Of course, Cord's three marques of opulence were not the only glamorous cars being made in America between the Wars. Some of them even managed to survive their own extravagance. Admittedly, this Cadillac probably wouldn't have if it weren't for the rest of that most classy of brands other vehicles propping up this one at the top of the tree. What's so special about it? You're possibly thinking that it looks just like any other 1930s grandly built big car. You need to zoom in a bit to realise why... See that little red enamel badge in the radiator? That lets you know that the motive power for this gorgeous 1931Type 452A Madame X sedan is no normal mill Cadillac were already seen as the ultimate expression of automotive luxury in America when company president Lawrence P Fisher took it upon himself to produce "the most fabulous Cadillac of all". Rivals such as Packard and Pierce-Arrow were developing V12 engines, Cord's empire featured prodigious Lycoming eights and even "lower" marques such as Buick were rolling with straight-eight power. Something special was needed, and the Cadillac V16 was the answer. A truly breathtaking piece of engineering, essentially two straight eight engines stuck together on a common crankcase, the motor featured a counterweighted crank (not an easy thing to achieve), hydraulic tappets and overhead valves... most contemporary engines still ran an L-head sidevalve setup. Perhaps letting it down slightly were the pair of carburettors, only one for each bank, but the massive mill still squished a healthy 452 cubic inches (7.4 litres) and grunted its way to a lazy and torque-drenched 165bhp at a gentle 3200 rpm! As the utter pinnacle of the Cadillac brand it was inevitable that limited numbers would be sold, but at best the figures rose to 54 in a single year, and that was 1930, the year of release. No-one had seen such an incredible engine mated to the best of modern coachbuilding, but equally no-one could afford it and the lower models in the range offered similar performance and kudos at a much more reasonable price point. Indeed, had GM not already bought the Fisher and Fleetwood coachbuilders in-house to body Cadillacs, it's doubtful the V16 would have come in even as unaffordable as it did! But then, it was never meant to sell vast numbers. The phrase "halo model" hadn't been invented yet, but it could have been made perfectly to suit the V16. The range ran from 1930 to 1940 (redesigned in '38) and sold no more than a handful every year, but the effect it had on the Cadillac brand image was priceless. The example in the Haynes museum is the so-called Madame X sedan. The origin of the name is slightly exotic. The legend goes that Harley Earl, GM stylist, saw a play at the Fisher Theatre across the Main Street in Detroit from the GM Building. Ruth Chatterton played the lead role, "Madame X" and Earl managed to meet her, so impressed was he by her performance. He promised that the next car he designed would be named in her honour... and realising that GM brass were not likely to be authorising the "Model Ruth" any time soon, he named the car after the mysterious Madame X. It's uncertain... but likely... that the connections to the John Singer Sargent "Madame X" painting that caused so much controversy at the 1884 Paris Salon were unforeseen but welcome. The mystique surrounding the palid, esoteric lady in Sagent's career-breaking painting perfectly matched the aura of exotic mystery and romance that Earl wished to contrive for his lady friend. So I can rest easy now. I've worshipped at the altar of these four great examples of hubris and excess. It seems insane now that such ridiculously-priced vehicles could be made at the time of the worst economic quagmire of the century... or even that anyone could seriously produce luxury items that cost seven times the annual salary of a skilled professional. But then, it's a cycle that repeats even to this day. And on that note, I head towards the supercar gallery off the American annexe because the guidebook tells me that I've missed the Jaguar XJ220 and that has to be the British equivalent of the fatal Cord white elephant phenomena. I haven't missed it; it's not here, just an empty space. Dang. I love XJ220s. Still, what I do find is a face I recognise.. that of it that isn't covered in hair like some evolved Flump. Hardcore is a genuine RR legend and fellow RX-7 sufferer. I passed on a few redundant pieces of Rex sheet metal to him, so it's nice to finally see a familiar face. And in attendance, a whole load of other RRers to whom I'm introduced. Nice to put faces to humorous internet identities and see character traits exhibit in real life! So, all introductions over we head off for the room where the end-of-year awards and general waffle meeting is scheduled. As is normally the case with car enthusiasts, this proves rather like herding cats and a lot of time is spent getting distracted with the ease of five-year-olds on lucozade by cars, bits of cars, and stories about cars. I don't mind. While we wander in ever-decreasing circles it gives me a chance to chase up a few more pics. And in stark contrast to the extravagance of Auburn et al, we have the combination of two cars that at one point you couldn't give away. The Model T legendarily sold gazillions at cheaps for everyone, and by the time Ford bothered to move onto their second model twenty years later, were worth less than nothing as they were so archaic. Jaguar produced the awkward XJS to replace the coveted and beloved E-Type and no-one bought it; too expensive, too fuel-hostile, too freakily styled. They combated this criticism by wedging in the only engine less fuel economical than the six; the brutal V12. And no-one bought them, either. It wasn't long before you could buy an unloved V12 XJS for the price of a bowl of soup at a homeless centre. And should you happen to have a rusted and Biblically obsolete Model T relic rotting away in the shed, the solution was obvious. The hotrod was hardly a new concept, but the peculiarly British phenomenon of the Jag-engined T-Bucket was. Thank the lord! The last thing I've got to offer before we part ways is Steph's Moggy. It's hard to know what to say about it, but if you accept that vehicle customisation is an artform then this must be the ultimate conclusion of that. A humble ex-Post Office Morris Minor van, this Moggy was disassembled, every part restored or replaced, and then every single piece painted or pleated or rejuvenated in some way. When I say everything is airbrushed that isn't leather wrapped, I mean everything. Even the exhaust! So it's gone beyond being a vehicle and into being something else. A labour of love, yes; it must have taken months to paint it all, let alone build it. And that's weird in a world where it would take less than a day to computer draw the designs, print them and wrap the car. But such weirdness ought to be celebrated and it's more than just one monomaniacal labour of love. It's a genuine work of art, and for me made even more worthy of respect because its origins were as one of the most humble and unremarkable cars ever built. A workhorse of the Post Office that someone cared enough to make into something completely unique regardless of all common sense or practicality. And after all, isn't that to some extent how we all exhibit our personality, what makes us ...us? We're all a triumph of individuality over good sense. Hurrah for us. (By the way, there is another genuine RR legend of acerbic wit in one of these photos. Nice to see some people are exactly as you'd want them to be in real life, not just in cyberspace) So that's my day out with Retro Rides and the Haynes museum then. If you haven't been, go. Anyone with an interest in cars can't fail to have a grand day out there. End of message. All that was left was to get another coffee from the cafe (no, that's fine, no milk thanks luv. I like to have my black coffee black, thanks) and take a seat for the gentle ribbing and ridicule that made up most of the RR annual awards. I totally failed to get any photos here, but y'know... it involved some people. I always do better with non-living subjects. Almost unbelievably, I've won an award too. For just such pointless and tediously verbose threads as this! In finest plastic and home-printed actual paper! I was actually a bit bamboozled by that, and in all the best grizzling award acceptance speeches, it's mostly because it was actually voted for by the fans... or at least the people who read this drivel and don't think "Please shut up, fool". It's now in pride of place on my mantleshelf. Yes, really. So that's it. The end. At last. Thanks for reading as always and hopefully you found something to like. Until next time, go away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 27, 2016 17:06:29 GMT
|
That must have taken flippin' ages to write (took me ages to read and I just skimmed through bits of it), thanks.
I realise my thanks seem a bit flimsy after that, but I cant really think of anything else to write. so.... ...thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bloody glad I wasn't trying to read that on my phone!
Thanks for the Tiger, very thoughtful. Thanks also for the Jowett, for my late and much unlamented grandfather had one. About his only redeeming feature!
Anyway, loved the pics and enjoyed the words. Your work would seem to be done!
And rest.
Edit: And I got to see what an award looks like!!!
|
|
Last Edit: Mar 28, 2016 3:39:17 GMT by georgeb
|
|
|
|
|
Amazing. Absolutely the best post on RR for eons: excellent photos, superb write-up. Thank you for taking the time to do this.
|
|
|
|
randywanger_
Part of things
Nissan Bluebird P510 SSS Coupe
Posts: 946
|
|
|
Inside the 512, outside the 356 were my favourites. Well done
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 29, 2016 12:50:08 GMT
|
Did the Power That Be in RR Towers not post you an award, georgeb ? Or did it just get absorbed into the Philippines postal system, never to be seen again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29, 2016 13:24:17 GMT
|
Did the Power That Be in RR Towers not post you an award, georgeb ? Or did it just get absorbed into the Philippines postal system, never to be seen again? Not posted it ... I plan to, but been a bit snowed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29, 2016 14:07:10 GMT
|
excellent read, super photos.
Cheers
|
|
"...red wine, quantity not quality" D. Attenborough
|
|
mikeymk
Part of things
'85 Polo Coupe S 1.6 16v
Posts: 931
|
|
Mar 29, 2016 15:59:18 GMT
|
Great thread, i've been meaning to go there for years, now i'm gonna make it a priority. So much to comment on, so instead, i'll merely contribute by shedding some light on this.. ...A strangely see-through Cossie in a motorsport flava... It was done for a motor oil commercial, and i remember the advert being on the telly in the '80s. It drives - there's another engine in the back, and what's more, the cutaway engine is motorised. The black Texaco Sierra RS500 Cosworth was in the BTCC at the time, so for the advertisment, they showed this car driving around the circuit, showing the engine operating, to give you an idea of what the oil had to cope with. It'd be nice if i could find a video of the advert, but it's not happening for me.
|
|
|
|
luckyseven
Posted a lot
Owning sneering dismissive pedantry since 1970
Posts: 3,839
Club RR Member Number: 45
|
|
Mar 29, 2016 16:37:48 GMT
|
That'd explain a lot, mikeymk . The car is dressed up in the black Texaco livery, where it's not see-through
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29, 2016 17:54:08 GMT
|
Duckhams Hypergrade oil advert. Built by RMA Special Effects. The rear engine was a VW lump and electrically powered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29, 2016 20:12:56 GMT
|
Yep, that's what it was... I seem to remember the ad being a bit longer back in the day though. Great write up and photos luckyseven well deserving of your award of finest plastic and home-printed actual paper! while I was writing my twelve cars drivel last year I can't tell you how much I missed this car. It just sat there outside Pistonpopper towers waiting, hoping expectantly to be driven, but as I was driving the others so I could write about them I barely touched it! I've put more miles on it in the first three months this year than I did all year last year... no wait, that smileys not big enough
|
|
|
|
|